EU lawmaker committees call for single EU telco regulator

And we need a 'harmonised framework' for spectrum allocation as well


The EU's telecoms market should be regulated by a single authority, two committees at the European Parliament have said.

The Committee on Industry, Research and Energy, and Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection, made the recommendation in a motion tabled for a new European Parliament resolution on the subject of the EU's work towards a digital single market.

Resolutions that are voted through by the European Parliament are not binding, but they often express the law-making body's support for policies and willingness to adopt new legislation that the European Commission could put forward.

In their 'Towards a Digital Market Act' report the two committees said the Commission should put forward plans for a "single telecom regulator" in an effort to ensure telecoms regulations are applied uniformly across the EU, and also rejected the idea that competition rules need to be watered down to encourage investment in new telecoms infrastructure.

The Commission is currently reviewing EU telecoms rules. It held a consultation exercise in the autumn last year and has said it intends to use the views it gathers to inform new "regulatory proposals" that it expects to publish this year.

The report said: "The European Commission should ensure that the regulatory framework drives competition and thereby private investments in networks. It does not require the weakening of competition rules as there is little evidence of a link between consolidation of companies and an increase in investments."

"The revision of the telecoms framework should aim at ensuring the rules are fit for the digital age and drive competition and innovation for over-the-top services and telecom operators, to the benefit of consumers," it added.

"Incentivising private investments in networks also requires for the European Union to have a harmonised framework for spectrum allocation, to give legal certainty to investors. The European Commission should urgently build momentum with member states to move forward with such proposal. Last but not least, the European Commission should propose a single telecom regulator to ensure a uniform application of rules," it said.

The committees said the "role, capacity and decisions" of the existing Body of European Regulators of Electronic Communications (BEREC) should be strengthened "to achieve consistent application of the regulatory framework, ensure oversight in the development of the single market, and resolve cross-border disputes" in the area of telecoms.

In a speech in October 2015, EU commissioner for the digital single market Andrus Ansip said that telecoms networks that can deliver "top-class connections" across the whole of the EU "needs to be built, quickly, and with the appropriate infrastructure".

He said the telecoms regulations review would look to support the funding of those projects by companies. "Tackling the huge investment gap to fund the next-generation networks that Europe needs is a major long-term challenge," Ansip said. "The public purse can't be expected to meet this shortfall. This is why the ongoing review of EU telecoms legislation will look closely at how to incentivise and leverage more private investment."

The idea of a single regulator for the EU's telecoms market has been mooted before. In 2013, the European Commission published plans to reform a raft of telecoms rules which were aimed at establishing a single EU telecoms market. Those plans were eventually watered down with the eventual reforms being focused on curbing roaming charges and setting new net neutrality laws.

Prior to the Commission's 2013 proposals being published the Commission's Directorate General for Competition (DG Comp) had expressed support for a "true pan-EU regulator" of telecoms. That suggestion did not, however, make it into the Commission's official proposals at the time.

DG Comp had said that establishing such a regulator "would be the most effective solution to remove national divergences" in the way telecoms rules are applied. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise adds Wi-Fi 6E to 'premium' access points
    Company claims standard will improve performance in dense environments

    Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise is the latest networking outfit to add Wi-Fi 6E capability to its hardware, opening up access to the less congested 6GHz spectrum for business users.

    The France-based company just revealed the OmniAccess Stellar 14xx series of wireless access points, which are set for availability from this September. Alcatel-Lucent Enterprise said its first Wi-Fi 6E device will be a high-end "premium" Access Point and will be followed by a mid-range product by the end of the year.

    Wi-Fi 6E is compatible with the Wi-Fi 6 standard, but adds the ability to use channels in the 6GHz portion of the spectrum, a feature that will be built into the upcoming Wi-Fi 7 standard from the start. This enables users to reduce network contention, or so the argument goes, as the 6GHz portion of the spectrum is less congested with other traffic than the existing 2.4GHz and 5GHz frequencies used for Wi-Fi access.

    Continue reading
  • Will Lenovo ever think beyond hardware?
    Then again, why develop your own software à la HPE GreenLake when you can use someone else's?

    Analysis Lenovo fancies its TruScale anything-as-a-service (XaaS) platform as a more flexible competitor to HPE GreenLake or Dell Apex. Unlike its rivals, Lenovo doesn't believe it needs to mimic all aspects of the cloud to be successful.

    While subscription services are nothing new for Lenovo, the company only recently consolidated its offerings into a unified XaaS service called TruScale.

    On the surface TruScale ticks most of the XaaS boxes — cloud-like consumption model, subscription pricing — and it works just like you'd expect. Sign up for a certain amount of compute capacity and a short time later a rack full of pre-plumbed compute, storage, and network boxes are delivered to your place of choosing, whether that's a private datacenter, colo, or edge location.

    Continue reading
  • Intel is running rings around AMD and Arm at the edge
    What will it take to loosen the x86 giant's edge stranglehold?

    Analysis Supermicro launched a wave of edge appliances using Intel's newly refreshed Xeon-D processors last week. The launch itself was nothing to write home about, but a thought occurred: with all the hype surrounding the outer reaches of computing that we call the edge, you'd think there would be more competition from chipmakers in this arena.

    So where are all the AMD and Arm-based edge appliances?

    A glance through the catalogs of the major OEMs – Dell, HPE, Lenovo, Inspur, Supermicro – returned plenty of results for AMD servers, but few, if any, validated for edge deployments. In fact, Supermicro was the only one of the five vendors that even offered an AMD-based edge appliance – which used an ageing Epyc processor. Hardly a great showing from AMD. Meanwhile, just one appliance from Inspur used an Arm-based chip from Nvidia.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022