Wikimedia Foundation bins community-elected trustee

Also appoints former Google exec to another seat


The Wikimedia Foundation has ousted a community-elected board trustee, whose seat now lies empty. At the same time, it has also appointed two hand-picked trustees for two other vacant spots: a former Google executive with a controversial record and a Mountain View CFO. These are just two changes that were announced quietly over the Christmas dead period.

James Heilman, a Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) trustee elected by the Wikipedia community last year, was dumped without explanation after a board of trustees vote. An accompanying statement simply stated he lacked the confidence of his fellow trustees.

According to Heilman, he had refused to walk and so was pushed:

“I was given the option of resigning over the last few weeks. As a community elected member I see my mandate as coming from the community which elected me and thus declined to do so. I saw such a move as letting down those who elected me,” he wrote on Jimmy Wales’ talk page.

The Wikistrategies newsletter notes that Heilman’s original election to the WMF was a “referendum” on the WMF’s recent actions, including its attempts to enforce the use of software created by the foundation that the community of volunteer contributors didn’t want.

Heilman hasn't been replaced yet. There will either be a community vote to recommend a new candidate to the board, or they will use the fourth-placed candidate from last year's vote, María Sefidari.

The foundation’s board has nine seats: four appointees; three community-elected; two selected by chapters and related groups; and one permanently reserved for the Líder Máximo, Jimmy Wales.

As for the two new appointees, they're former Google staffing exec Arnnon Geshuri, who's now with Tesla, and CFO at Mountain View firm Bracket Computing, Kelly Battles. They're replacing Stu West and Jan-Bart de Vreede, whose terms ran out on December 31, 2015.

Geshuri figured prominently in the Silicon Valley "staff poaching" scandal while a “senior staffing strategist” at Google.

He was the executive who promptly terminated the contract* (“within the hour”) of a colleague who attempted to hire a member of staff from Apple. This is fair labour market practice but according to court documents had incurred the wrath of Steve Jobs, who then promptly wrote directly to Google’s then-CEO Eric Schmidt.

Apple, Google, Intel and Adobe were amongst the companies who operated alleged informal reciprocal no-hire agreements, which, according to a US Department of Justice complaint launched in 2010, were anticompetitive. This led to a subsequent class action suit, which the big four eventually settled out of court, paying out over $400m.

Fundraiser? I hardly know etc

The foundation has raised a quarter of a billion dollars since the start of the decade, not counting its latest aggressive annual funding drive, which concluded in December. In June 2015, the date for which the most recent accounts are available, the WMF had $27m in surplus cash and cash equivalents. However, the operational cost of hosting the Wikipedia servers is relatively small, at around $2.5m a year. Since the workers who write and edit the pages are unpaid, the foundation has been able to create a burgeoning class of paid foundation employees, whose salaries swallow most of its estimated $55m annual expenses.

Wikipedia’s own plucky newsletter, Signpost, has an account of the foundation's terminations and appointments here. Signpost reports disquiet amongst the WMF’s 240 staff. Community manager and VP of the Wikimedia Australia chapter Liam Wyatt suggests that the paid foundation and the unpaid community are going separate ways.

“I suspect that the major strategic direction has already been privately determined. In short, it appears there will be an attempt to create the internet’s Next Big Thing™ at the expense of improving the great thing that we already have,” Wyatt writes. ®

* This emerged during a class action lawsuit, High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California 11-cv-2509


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022