Serving up IT on a silver platter, also known as ITSM

Would you like that email account and Office installation a la carte?

In the 1950s, we imagined a world where everything was automated. Robots would clean for us, and small boxes would instantly produce hot food. Now, we have the Roomba and the microwave, and shortly, cars that drive themselves. Even Zuck is preparing his electronic butler. To top it all, there’s not a dodgy-looking Jetsons costume in sight.

What about IT professionals, though? You’d assume they would be at the forefront of the automation wave, but lots are still labouring away manually at work. The closest that many get to automation is a hastily-written Python script. Isn’t it time to work smarter rather than harder, in a bid to serve your users better, and make life easier at the same time? IT service management (ITSM) could be the answer.

IT at your service

In Deloitte’s 2014 Global CIO survey, 55 per cent of IT budgets are devoted to "business as usual" operations – keeping the lights on and the engines running, and everyone’s email flowing. Moreover, 55 per cent of CIOs also list "delivering business outcomes through business services" as a priority, making it the most important by far in CIOs’ eyes. ITSM addresses both of these things by turning those everyday operations into services that can be consumed by line of business managers.

ITSM makes services more visible to users, enabling them to do everything from setting up a new workstation to provisioning storage or buying software, all via an online portal. This brings several benefits, not least of which is the ability to charge back (or at least "show back") the cost of these services to users. That can help to make business departments more accountable for what they use and stop them placing unrealistic demands on IT.

Automate, automate, automate

ITSM can also help those IT departments by cutting the money they spend on IT operations. It does this by automating a lot of the mundane tasks, from resource provisioning through to change management and incident management.

Without automation, errors can creep in, creating fires that take lots of time and effort to put out. Errors in manual change management contribute to support incidents. Completely manual incident management ties up labour, and fighting fires like this isn’t scalable or sustainable. Fires spread, sucking up the resources of not just level 1 staff, but L2 and L3 engineers, in some cases.

“The way that we traditionally ordered stuff and started to configure things such as servers can all be done automatically now,” said Barclay Rae, CEO at the IT Service Management Forum. In the old days, phoning a helpdesk and asking for Microsoft project may have triggered a series of manual processes as people checked that you were authorised to buy it, and then checked that your server could handle it, he explained.

Today, automated ITSM enables people to request such services directly on a portal. “Now, there’s no human touch from there because it'll provision it for you in a virtual machine,” he said. “Something that took days or weeks, because there were a lot of people touching it, can now take seconds.”

An uphill struggle

It all sounds a bit Utopian. If ITSM is the promised land, then the IT manager can expect to be like Moses, slogging 40 years through the desert to get there. It takes a substantial effort to get ITSM right, and that’s the biggest problem for a lot of smaller companies that want to automate their IT service management. They’re perpetually stuck in firefighting mode, and don’t allocate the time and resource to building a more strategic solution, warned Martin Waters, head of product development for service management at IT training firm QA.

“A lot of SMEs still may not have even done the basics,” he said, referring to self-service portals. “Even those that have done the self-service portal for users. Often it’s just a veneer for information capture but there’s no automation going on behind it.”

Devoting enough resource to ITSM automation is only one part of the problem. Another is a lot of the processes they’re trying to automate span multiple disciplines, warned Waters. When companies forget this, it can lead to fragmentation and misaligned efforts.

“The danger is that single teams go off, scope an area of automation and the tools required for that, and they do in isolation,” he said. “So when it comes to link that tool into other activities, it hasn’t been thought about. Many of the services that you’re trying to define will use their own tools. You’ll probably have specific software for helpdesk co-ordination and configuration management, for example, and you should consider these integrations when determining which ITSM tool to buy.

Integration with IT asset management, network discovery and endpoint management tools are particularly important here. Assessing what’s in your estate can be expensive, said Rae, but you can use automated discovery tools to help mitigate this process, and clarify just what IT resources are available and what needs managing.

Emphasising service design

The other danger is that the teams don’t take time to refine the processes that they’re going to automate. ITSM automation is like carpentry: you measure twice, and cut once. If you’re automating crummy, ill-defined and inefficient processes, then it’s garbage in, garbage out.

Refining IT processes before you automate them requires its own level of maturity, and might mean addressing some cultural issues within the company. If your IT professionals are territorial and the place is politically charged, then you may have problems.

“Things might be seen as challenging their technical knowledge or authority,” said Rae. So a charm offensive may be necessary.

Even when you’ve driven automation into your ITSM system, don’t expect a lights-off operation. Someone is often going to need to check and approve something, whether it’s a report on how many VMs a development team is using, or a system alert revealing that a particular software service is nearing licence capacity.

The key is that a lot of the gruntwork to get to that point can be done in advance, leaving the staff responsible with a far easier job. They can then take that time and use it to concentrate on other things, like planning enhanced services that will wow business users, for example. Before that can happen, though, there’s a lot of work to be done, involving some joined-up thinking. Better get yourself some coffee, a pen, and a large napkin. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • Cheers ransomware hits VMware ESXi systems
    Now we can say extortionware has jumped the shark

    Another ransomware strain is targeting VMware ESXi servers, which have been the focus of extortionists and other miscreants in recent months.

    ESXi, a bare-metal hypervisor used by a broad range of organizations throughout the world, has become the target of such ransomware families as LockBit, Hive, and RansomEXX. The ubiquitous use of the technology, and the size of some companies that use it has made it an efficient way for crooks to infect large numbers of virtualized systems and connected devices and equipment, according to researchers with Trend Micro.

    "ESXi is widely used in enterprise settings for server virtualization," Trend Micro noted in a write-up this week. "It is therefore a popular target for ransomware attacks … Compromising ESXi servers has been a scheme used by some notorious cybercriminal groups because it is a means to swiftly spread the ransomware to many devices."

    Continue reading
  • Twitter founder Dorsey beats hasty retweet from the board
    As shareholders sue the social network amid Elon Musk's takeover scramble

    Twitter has officially entered the post-Dorsey age: its founder and two-time CEO's board term expired Wednesday, marking the first time the social media company hasn't had him around in some capacity.

    Jack Dorsey announced his resignation as Twitter chief exec in November 2021, and passed the baton to Parag Agrawal while remaining on the board. Now that board term has ended, and Dorsey has stepped down as expected. Agrawal has taken Dorsey's board seat; Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor has assumed the role of Twitter's board chair. 

    In his resignation announcement, Dorsey – who co-founded and is CEO of Block (formerly Square) – said having founders leading the companies they created can be severely limiting for an organization and can serve as a single point of failure. "I believe it's critical a company can stand on its own, free of its founder's influence or direction," Dorsey said. He didn't respond to a request for further comment today. 

    Continue reading
  • Snowflake stock drops as some top customers cut usage
    You might say its valuation is melting away

    IPO darling Snowflake's share price took a beating in an already bearish market for tech stocks after filing weaker than expected financial guidance amid a slowdown in orders from some of its largest customers.

    For its first quarter of fiscal 2023, ended April 30, Snowflake's revenue grew 85 percent year-on-year to $422.4 million. The company made an operating loss of $188.8 million, albeit down from $205.6 million a year ago.

    Although surpassing revenue expectations, the cloud-based data warehousing business saw its valuation tumble 16 percent in extended trading on Wednesday. Its stock price dived from $133 apiece to $117 in after-hours trading, and today is cruising back at $127. That stumble arrived amid a general tech stock sell-off some observers said was overdue.

    Continue reading
  • Amazon investors nuke proposed ethics overhaul and say yes to $212m CEO pay
    Workplace safety, labor organizing, sustainability and, um, wage 'fairness' all struck down in vote

    Amazon CEO Andy Jassy's first shareholder meeting was a rousing success for Amazon leadership and Jassy's bank account. But for activist investors intent on making Amazon more open and transparent, it was nothing short of a disaster.

    While actual voting results haven't been released yet, Amazon general counsel David Zapolsky told Reuters that stock owners voted down fifteen shareholder resolutions addressing topics including workplace safety, labor organizing, sustainability, and pay fairness. Amazon's board recommended voting no on all of the proposals.

    Jassy and the board scored additional victories in the form of shareholder approval for board appointments, executive compensation and a 20-for-1 stock split. Jassy's executive compensation package, which is tied to Amazon stock price and mostly delivered as stock awards over a multi-year period, was $212 million in 2021. 

    Continue reading
  • Confirmed: Broadcom, VMware agree to $61b merger
    Unless anyone out there can make a better offer. Oh, Elon?

    Broadcom has confirmed it intends to acquire VMware in a deal that looks set to be worth $61 billion, if it goes ahead: the agreement provides for a “go-shop” provision under which the virtualization giant may solicit alternative offers.

    Rumors of the proposed merger emerged earlier this week, amid much speculation, but neither of the companies was prepared to comment on the deal before today, when it was disclosed that the boards of directors of both organizations have unanimously approved the agreement.

    Michael Dell and Silver Lake investors, which own just over half of the outstanding shares in VMware between both, have apparently signed support agreements to vote in favor of the transaction, so long as the VMware board continues to recommend the proposed transaction with chip designer Broadcom.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022