It's Wikipedia mythbuster time: 8 of the best on your 15th birthday

What Wales doesn't want you to know


Comment Wikipedia's 15th birthday has brought its predictable spate of news coverage, some of it thoughtful, some of it filled with the inevitable barrage of spin and half-truths issuing from Wikimedia HQ.

Here's a round-up.

1. Who founded Wikipedia?

Jimmy Wales says in the Guardian, "I created Wikipedia 15 years ago".

In 2001, he still remembered that "Larry [Sanger] had the idea to use Wiki software for a separate project" to feed Wales' struggling "Nupedia". Wales was reportedly sceptical about the idea at first. Sanger coined the name "Wikipedia" (to avoid damaging Nupedia's respectable brand name) and invited the first contributors. Sanger was Wales' employee at the time, and Wales agreed to give Wikipedia a go, but the history is more complicated than Wales's simplistic narrative.

2. Why doesn't Wikipedia have ads?

In the Telegraph, Wales says, "I don't regret not monetising Wikipedia." Perhaps so, but Wikipedia started out as a dotcom. As Torsten Kleinz notes, when the possibility of ads was raised in 2002, volunteers abandoned ship. They had no interest in working for free so Wales could get rich. The entire Spanish Wikipedia community left and set up a rival encyclopedia. As a commercial project, Kleinz says, Wikipedia would probably have tanked.

3. It's just love of free knowledge that motivates Wikipedians, right?

Not entirely. Many of Wikipedia's mostly male volunteers have definite motives besides altruism, participating for years in the "community" to live out grudges and personal vendettas, or to protect commercial or ideological interests. Even the humblest Wikipedians will concede that their attention needs and a desire for their "15 megabytes of fame" contribute to their Wikipedia "addiction". After all, even as a complete nobody, you can affect the content of a page that a potential audience of over a billion internet users will be shown as the top link for a search.

4. Still, no one makes money off Wikipedia, right?

Wikipedia has a Creative Commons licence, which means that anyone can make money off it. The information snippets Google and Bing display at the top or on the right of their search results pages draw on Wikipedia. They train your eye to ignore the actual search results and look at those parts of the page first. Lo and behold, that's also where the paying ads are, which allow Google to rake in revenue of about $200 million daily. Platforms like Google and Facebook love and promote the idea of "free knowledge", because they can and do display that content as bait for their ads. Some Wikipedia volunteers are waking up to the uncomfortable realisation that Google probably views them as "useful idiots".

5. But Wikipedia is all about providing free education to the underprivileged, isn't it?

Not exactly. Among Wikipedia's most viewed articles of 2015, movies led any other category by large margins. Most of the Wikimedia Foundation's bandwidth costs are expended so that privileged First World netizens can look up things like who played Chewbacca in Star Wars. Moreover, Wikipedia's coverage of topics that would actually be useful to those lacking access to good education is often inadequate.

6. But isn't Wikipedia all about the democratisation of knowledge, and diversity?

No, actually. Wikipedia, being a free resource, holds an inherent price advantage. It has no real competitors. As academic Heather Ford points out, "rather than this leading to an increase in the diversity of knowledge and the democratisation of expertise, the result has actually been greater consolidation in the number of knowledge sources considered authoritative. Wikipedia, particularly in terms of its alliance with Google and other search engines, now plays a central role." That's not a good thing: "What makes today's realignment different is the ways in which sources like Wikipedia are governed and controlled. Instead of the known, visible heads of academic and scientific institutions [she could have mentioned news organisations here as well, whose biases are a known quantity], sources like Wikipedia are largely controlled by nebulous, often anonymous individuals and collectives."

7. But isn't Wikipedia available in almost 300 different language versions?

Yes, but according to a 2014 presentation at Wikimedia's annual "Wikimania" conference, 159 of those Wikipedias have fewer than five contributors (65 have none). Moreover, many smaller Wikipedias have huge political problems. In 2013, the Croatian Education minister warned his country's youth not to consult the Croatian Wikipedia, because it had been usurped by fascists. The Uzbek Wikipedia's biography of Uzbekistan's dictator Islam Karimov, infamous for "boiling his opponents", is a hagiography in the best Soviet tradition. Pravda reborn!

In Azerbaijan, Wikipedia volunteers last year issued a desperate SOS, saying Wikipedians had been subjected to torture at the behest of an administrator with government connections. (Wikimedia banned the administrator.) In Kazakhstan, a smart functionary used state funds to transfer the censored, state-published Kazakh National Encyclopedia into the Kazakh Wikipedia – an effort Wales inexplicably* rewarded with an unprecedented "Wikipedian of the Year" award. It's an episode Wales now seems to find embarrassing; in best "benevolent dictator" tradition, he recently (unsuccessfully) tried to have a volunteer who raised the issue "permanently blocked" from Wikipedia.

The fact is that Wikipedia's volunteer model doesn't scale in many of the world's poorer or politically oppressed countries. It's a problem money won't solve; yet this didn't stop Wales from telling Associated Press that "One of the things that we are focused on is the idea of having an encyclopedia available for every person in the world in their own language. As you go in that direction, these (requests for money) are some of [the] things you need to do to build that long-term dream." Right.

8. But Wikipedia needs money, doesn't it?

That depends on your definition of "need". Wikipedia's article writers work for free. The Foundation's employees, however, don't. Their number has ballooned from eleven in 2007 to almost 300 today (17 in Fundraising alone). Internet hosting, once Wikipedia's main expense, cost less than $2m last year; at the same time, the Foundation reported net assets of $78m, including $35m in "cash and cash equivalents" and $29m in "short-term investments".

But the Foundation has long planned to set up an endowment; these plans are now going ahead. Secondly, with alternative knowledge delivery systems like Apple's Siri and Google's Knowledge Graph on the rise, some feel the days of the encyclopedia are numbered. Resources are being invested in Wikidata and a new "Discovery" or "Knowledge Engine" project said to have been a contributory factor in the current dust-up between the volunteer community and the Wikimedia board.

In the Washington Post, Andrew Lih asks, "Wikipedia just turned 15 years old. Will it survive 15 more?" One thing is certain: it will not be what it is today. ®

Andreas Kolbe serves on the editorial board of Wikipedia's community newsletter, The Signpost.

Bootnote

* According to Mr Wales, the awarding of the prize was unwitting. He has since said he was “not aware” the official had been working for the regime.


Other stories you might like

  • A hotline to His Billness? Or a guard having a bit of a giggle?

    Choose Your Own On Call

    On Call You can never be sure who is on the other end of the on-call phone. It might be a minion... but sometimes it might be the master. Or maybe not.

    Today's story is another from Register reader Alessandro (not his name) and takes us back to the glory days before Microsoft Exchange, when Microsoft Mail was all the rage (sort of).

    Alessandro worked for a small European company beta testing Microsoft Mail. The team was ace at finding bugs in Microsoft's code, so much so that a member of the development team passed on his direct dial number so the gang could file issues directly, "bypassing the (painful) Microsoft system," explained Alessandro.

    Continue reading
  • VMware’s just given its best allies the tool to spread its Tanzu container creed

    4000 service provider clouds are based on vSphere — now they’re all capable of running Kubernetes too

    VMware has shipped Tanzu Basic for service providers, making it possible to run Kubernetes on over 4000 clouds, and thereby given itself a better chance at having its containerised stack succeed.

    When Virtzilla talks about its cloud presence, it focuses on its deals with hyperscalers like AWS, Azure, Google, Oracle, and Alibaba.

    But the company’s cloud strategy has long had a critical second strand, in the form of the VMware Cloud Provider Program (VCPP) and its 4000-plus members that run VMware-powered clouds. Some VCPP members are whales like IBM and NTT, or significant clouds like OVH. But plenty more are the kind of smaller players that medium-sized businesses see as peers and gravitate towards. And even though they may run just a few racks, they’re trusted advisors to their clients.

    Continue reading
  • Chinese web giant Baidu unveils Level 4 robo-taxi that costs $75k to make

    Plans to roll 1,000 of 'em off the production line in three years

    Chinese tech giant Baidu and state-owned BAIC Group's ARCFOX Brand have teamed to build 1000 autonomous electric vehicles (EVs) for use as taxis over the next three years — and claim they’ve cut manufacturing costs to just $75,000 apiece.

    The announcement claims the reasonable price is due to maturation in technology and mass production capabilities and makes the vehicle, called the Apollo Moon, only one third of the cost of average L4 autonomous vehicles.

    Apollo Moon has a projected operating cycle of over five years and is built on the fully electric midsize crossover SUV, Arcfox α-T. As for the tech, it uses the ANP-Robotaxi navigation platform, which is currently in pilot. Baidu claims the architecture can “reduce the weight of autonomous vehicle kits while sharing intelligent driving vehicle data to create a closed-loop information ecosystem.”

    Continue reading
  • India’s ban on Chinese apps eases just a little as PUBG blasts back onto Google Play, maybe Korean Stock market too

    Fragfest adds green blood, Azure cloud, shirts, and detailed rules about how to kill people politely to satisfy regulators

    PUBG, one of the highest-profile China-linked apps India banned in 2020, has been allowed back into Google’s Indian Play store despite India's previous insistence its bans are permanent.

    While PUBG is owned by a South Korean company called Krafton, in India the game was previously operated by Chinese web giant Tencent. Indian authorities worried that some user data ended up behind The Great Firewall and therefore within view of the Chinese government.

    The massively popular massively multiplayer shooting game was therefore banned along with 117 other apps that India deemed “prejudicial to sovereignty and integrity of India, defence of India, security of state and public order."

    Continue reading
  • South Korea bans 1700 tech products for using forged test reports

    Huawei, Cisco, and Samsung caught out as US-based testing labs allegedly sent work to China

    South Korea’s Ministry of Science and ICT has revoked safety certification for 1696 communications products after discovering that test results attesting to their safety were misrepresented.

    A Ministry annnouncement explains that it received a tip-off that numerous test reports for telecoms and broadcast tech had not been conducted in labs covered by international reciprocity agreements.

    The tests are routine affairs to ensure that devices don’t emit harmful radiation, and several nations have signed up to a mutual recognition agreement that allows tests conducted in one nation to be widely accepted elsewhere.

    Continue reading
  • Facebook and Singapore teams looking for ways to get data centres relaxing in moist tropical climes

    Heat and humidity are horrible, and your server can’t quaff a cocktail to cool off

    Singapore’s two major universities — Nanyang Technological University (NTU) and the National University of Singapore (NUS) — have announced they are establishing a US$17.2M research program to develop data centre cooling tech that works in tropical environments.

    “The new Sustainable Tropical Data Centre Testbed (STDCT) — the first of its kind in the tropics — will serve as an innovation hub for academia and industry to work together to future-proof the region’s data centre industry,” said NUS in their canned statement.

    The program is primarily funded by National Research Foundation Singapore (NRF) and Facebook, which has made Singapore its Asian home. Singapore’s Infocomm Media Development Authority (IMDA) is supporting the university research, and additional industry partners include Ascenix Pte Ltd, CoolestDC Pte Ltd, Keppel Data Centres, New Media Express Pte Ltd, and Red Dot Analytics Pte Ltd.

    Continue reading
  • Dem, Repub senators propose tax credits for factories that churn out chips on US soil

    It'll be absolutely FABS-ulous, Wyden and Crapo promise

    US senators introduced a law bill on Thursday offering semiconductor manufacturers tax credits to encourage them to build more fabrication plants on American soil as well as specialized equipment for chips.

    The bipartisan Facilitating American-Built Semiconductors (FABS) Act [PDF] was backed by Senate Finance Committee Chair Ron Wyden (D-OR), and Ranking Member Mike Crapo (R-ID). It’s the latest piece of legislation proposed by Congress aimed at incentivizing the production of semiconductors in the United States as the world grapples with a global shortage of electronics components and materials to build everything from cars to video game consoles.

    The FABS Act could help bolster US supply chains, meaning businesses would have to rely less on foreign manufacturers, particularly those across East Asia, and be able to more easily secure the kit they need. Chip production in America has fallen from 37 per cent of global output to 12 per cent over the past two decades as companies manufacture parts abroad because it's cheaper, according to the pair of senators.

    Continue reading
  • Google dishes out homemade SLSA, a recipe to thwart software supply-chain attacks

    Try it with phish'n'chips

    Google has proposed a framework called SLSA for dealing with supply chain attacks, a security risk exemplified by the recent compromise of the SolarWinds Orion IT monitoring platform.

    SLSA – short for Supply chain Levels for Software Artifacts and pronounced "salsa" for those inclined to add convenience vowels – aspires to provide security guidance and programmatic assurance to help defend the software build and deployment process.

    "The goal of SLSA is to improve the state of the industry, particularly open source, to defend against the most pressing integrity threats," said Kim Lewandowski, Google product manager, and Mark Lodato, Google software engineer, in a blog post on Wednesday. "With SLSA, consumers can make informed choices about the security posture of the software they consume."

    Continue reading
  • FYI: There's a human-less, AI robot Mayflower ship sailing from the UK to US right now

    Follow this Plymouth to Plymouth trip online

    A 15-metre-long autonomous human-free ship has begun a 3,000-odd-mile trip from the UK to the US to recreate the historic Mayflower voyage of 1620.

    The Mayflower Autonomous Ship (MAS), named after the 17th century vessel that took more than 100 passengers from England to the present day's Massachusetts in America, set sail this week. It was launched from the seaside town Plymouth on Tuesday at 0400 UTC, and if all goes to plan, it’ll reach its American counterpart, the coastal city of Plymouth, MA, in a few weeks.

    Built by Promare, a maritime non-profit, with technical support from IBM, the Mayflower has been testing its sailing and navigation skills since September last year to prepare for this trip. It uses radar to detect objects within 2.5 nautical miles, and a suite of cameras connected to an object-recognition system. This machine-learning software has been trained to identify cargo ships, fishing vessels, and floating shipping containers.

    Continue reading
  • TITAN crypto-token does the opposite of zero to $60: Value plummets in hours

    And did a code bug throw a spanner in the works for IRON investors?

    A cryptocurrency token called TITAN collapsed on Wednesday, going from about $60 apiece to near zero in a matter of hours. The sales frenzy, attributed to a sell-off driven by whales – people who hold large amounts of a cryptocurrency in this context – also destabilized a so-called stablecoin known as IRON.

    A stablecoin is pegged to a reserve asset like the dollar, the idea being there's less volatility when investors know they can redeem their fanciful crypto credits for paper depicting dead presidents or some other thing likely to retain value.

    IRON, however, proved to be anything but stable because it is only partially collateralized (about 75 per cent) by the US dollar. The remainder of its value came from TITAN tokens, and when the TITAN price collapsed, IRON took a hit too. Among those caught up in the crypto run was tech moneybags Mark Cuban.

    Continue reading
  • Ex-Brave staffer launches GDPR sueball in Germany over tech giants' real-time bidding for ad inventory

    Privacy browser's former chief policy officer calls web advertising ecosystem 'the Biggest. Data. Breach. Ever'

    Former Brave chief policy officer Johnny Ryan is continuing his crusade against the online advertising industry by filing a lawsuit against Google, Facebook, Amazon, Twitter, and US telco AT&T in Germany.

    Ryan's latest campaign organisation, the Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL), said in a statement that online advertising amounts to "the Biggest. Data. Breach. Ever" and accusing internet adland of compiling "secret dossiers" on every single netizen.

    "These secret dossiers about you – based on what you think is private – could prompt an algorithm to remove you from the shortlist for your dream job," said Ryan. "A retailer might use the data to single you out for a higher price online. A political group might micro target you with personalised disinformation."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021