Oracle blurts Google's Android secrets in court: You made $22bn using Java, punk

And Google paid Apple $1bn to put its search into iPhones

An Oracle lawyer has blurted out in court how much money Google has made from Android – figures that the web giant has fiercely fought to keep secret.

And those numbers are: US$31bn in revenue, and US$22bn in profit, since 2008, when Android was launched. This money comes from Google's cut from sales made via the Google Play store and adverts shown in apps.

Oracle is in the middle of suing Google in the US for copyright infringement, accusing the search kingpin of ripping off the Java language APIs in Android. Oracle acquired Java when it bought Sun Microsystems in 2010, and promptly sued Google for using its class library API on Android without paying a dime for it.

In effect, Oracle is arguing that it can copyright software interfaces – not the software itself, just the way it interfaces with other code.

Android initially used a Java class library derived from Apache's open-source Harmony project, and is in the process of switching to code from the open-source OpenJDK project, which is developed by Oracle.

Regardless of that switch, Oracle wants a hefty chunk of money – as much as $1bn – that Google made from Android between 2008 and last year. Over the past few weeks, the pair have been squabbling over exactly how much Google has been coining it from the mobile operating system. Oracle, which spent US$5.6bn acquiring Sun and its Java platforms, wants stats and figures on Android's use.

On January 14, Oracle lawyer Annette Hurst revealed during a San Francisco court hearing details of Android's financial performance, using figures derived from Google's own internal numbers that were supposed to be under a protection order during the copyright battle.

"Look at the extraordinary magnitude of commerciality here,” Hurst told the court while spelling out the revenue and profit.

It also emerged during the proceedings that Apple was paid $1bn by Google in 2014 to keep its search engine as the default on iPhones.

Google pleaded with the court to remove the financial information from the hearing's transcripts, and place the numbers under seal. After that request was shot down on January 19, the next day Google begged the court [PDF] to reconsider. In a filing, Google lawyer Edward Bayley wrote:

During the January 14, 2016 discovery hearing on Oracle's Motion to Compel, counsel for Oracle disclosed information regarding Google's sensitive, non-public revenues and profits associated with Android.

This information was derived from internal Google financial documents that Google has designated as "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEY'S EYES ONLY" under the Protective Order that governs this case.

Google does not publicly allocate revenues or profits to Android separate and apart from Google's general business. Google considers that non-public financial data to be highly sensitive, and public disclosure of the information described herein could have significant negative effects on Google's business.

Magistrate Judge Donna Ryu is considering [PDF] Google's latest plea.

You can follow the drama along at home using case ID number 3:10-cv-03561 in the northern district of California. The transcripts from last week's hearing are not due to be published until April, though. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021