Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Samsung trolls Google, adds adblockers to phones

What are you going to do about it, Alphabet?

Samsung has added built-in ad-blocking capabilities to its Android browser in its latest OTA (over-the-air) update to its Lollipop 5.0 devices, which include the Galaxy S6.

Samsung’s internet browser now supports third-party ad-blockers such as Adblock Fast. Firefox’s browser supports ad-blocking plug-ins, while to firewall unwanted traffic across the system, Android users need to root their devices, or install NoRoot Firewall.

Apple heralded the much vaunted "adpocalypse" by adding support for ad-blockers in Safari in its iOS9 update last year. Advertising spending on mobile campaigns is increasing more rapidly than other digital formats, in part because it has been harder to block advertising on mobile devices. Publishers have begun to fight back passive-aggressively, refusing to serve content to browsers with an active ad-blocker. The least passive, and most aggressive, was Alphabet (Google) itself: it took technical countermeasures against YouTube ad-blockers, and forced those attempting to block video ads to watch even longer video ads.

Alphabet develops and controls Android, and is almost entirely dependent on advertising for its revenue, which gained it $18.7bn in income in the most recent quarter, clearing $4.6bn in profit. Even with its significant research spending on toy robots (eg, balloons, drones and driverless cars), Google still has a hard time spending the proceeds; Alphabet is on course to hold the best part of $100bn in cash and assets by the end of the calendar year.

Earlier this month Oracle disclosed Google’s estimate that it had earned a profit of $22bn on Android, on revenue of $32bn. Google successfully applied to have the figures deleted from the record.

So will Samsung’s move accelerate the "adpocalypse"? Perhaps not as much as you might initially think. Samsung remains the No.1 Android vendor, and has only just slipped behind Apple in total smartphone shipments. But Chrome still dominates mobile browsing, with 41.57 per cent share so far in January 2016, and Chrome’s rise has been consistently steady.

Much depends on the agencies themselves. If mobile ads are generally viewed as degrading the user experience significantly, and if every mobile browser except Google’s Chrome allows ad-blockers, then Google has a real problem.

In a poll of their tech and media industry readers, newsletter Monday Note found that most would use an ad-blocker, but half would pay for content. ®

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like