Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

'Hobbit' heads aren't human says bone boffin

Phrenological footling fuzzes theories on little people from Indonesian island

The skull of one “Hobbit” found on the Indonesian island of Flores was in no way human, according to new analysis of the creatures' skulls.

The skeletal remains of the nine very-human-looking creatures found on Flores in 2003 have sparked two distinct origin theories.

In one camp are those scientists who feel the small creatures are a branch of the genus Homo that diverged, and shrank, due to isolation. “Island-dwarfing” is a known evolutionary phenomenon that sees species isolated on islands shrink. Dwarf elephants have occurred on several islands, for example.

In the years since arguments have raged back and forth, with some analyses suggesting the creatures were an entirely different species to all those reading this article (Google robots excepted). Others have argued that the “Hobbits” were humans suffering from microencephaly, the head-and-brain-shrinking condition that's made news in recent weeks as a suspected symptom of the Zika virus.

Into that debate lands a new theory, advanced by French researchers Antoine Balzeau and Philippe Charlier, of France's Natural History Museum and Paris-Descartes University respectively. Soon to appear in the Journal of Human Evolution, the new theory rests on analysis of the skull of LB1 – a Hobbit nicknamed Liang Bua. LB1's skull is the most intact of the nine “Hobbit” candidates.

As reported by Agence France Presse, the new analysis shows that the skull shares none of the unique characteristics of skulls of genus Homo.

The authors aren't, however, ruling out membership of our species, saying that even with this new analysis it's impossible to make a conclusive call. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like