Top new IoT foundation (yeah, another one) to develop open standards

Now it just has to convince the other IoT foundations

A new non-profit foundation dedicated to creating open standards for the Internet of Things (IoT) has launched.

The Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF) says its main goal is to "help unify IoT standards so that companies and developers can create IoT solutions and devices that work seamlessly together." It is being fronted by big-name tech companies including Cisco, Intel, Microsoft and Samsung.

The foundation is an expansion and a rebranding of a previous non-profit foundation that sought to achieve the same goal – the Open Internet Consortium – but in its new guise covers more markets and so has a greater chance of gaining broad acceptance for whatever it develops.

The Foundation now includes Microsoft, Qualcomm and Electrolux as well as other companies that cover processors, software, platform and products – all of which need to be on board with standards to achieve what many claim is the potential of the Internet of Things.

The OCF hopes to have certified products on the market by the end of the year.

There is one significant barrier to that work, however: other IoT foundations that have been created to do the exact same thing.

There is, for example, the IoT Security Foundation (IoTSF), which boasts a similar broad range of members. Its stated goal is to be "a collaborative, vendor-neutral, international initiative which aspires to be the expert resource for sharing knowledge, best practice and advice."

In that sense, it doesn't necessarily conflict with the Open Connectivity Foundation, but it is notable that of the IoTSF's 50 and the OCF's 150 members, there are only three companies in both. And despite being a founding member of the IoTSF, Intel is now leading the OCF, and its rival ARM has joined the IoTSF.

The rest

That's not all. There is also:

  • The Thread Group, which is focused around Google's plans for IoT and smart home standards, including Weave.
  • The Industrial Internet Consortium, whose focus is on testing standards but whose members clearly intend to influence new standards.
  • The AllSeen Alliance, which is headed up by the Linux Foundation and also plans to develop an interoperable platform and certify products to work with it.
  • Apple's HomeKit self-contained eco-system.
  • The prpl Foundation, which has just released secure embedded computing guidelines.
  • The IEEE 2413 project, also working on a standard framework.
  • And the IETF, which has a number of working groups looking to develop new IoT standards.

The members of these different groups vary widely. Some are exclusively within one group whereas others – especially Samsung and Qualcomm – seem to be in almost every one.

One of those companies, Imagination – which is a member of at least three of the groups – told us: "We are members of these groups and others to help drive open, interoperable standards and APIs, since we believe that openness and flexibility are key to driving innovation in IoT. And security is an increasing challenge that the entire industry needs to come together to address."

There are also alliances between several of the groups. First example – the OCF plans to interoperate with devices that come through the AllSeen Alliance through another project: IoTivity.

In short, it's not so much VHS versus Betamax, as VHS versus Betamax versus DVD versus Laserdisc versus MPEG4 versus Blu-Ray versus DivX.

They all share the same vision: billions of connected devices communicating with one another regardless of the product, its operating system or chipset or manufacturer. It's just that no one can agree on how that communication will work or who gets to decide. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021