Microsoft hoses down Windows Server hardware support change fears

Redmond looks like it's scared the horses with its PC hardware support changes


Microsoft's issued an interesting post in which it says it is making no changes to hardware support for Windows Server.

Hang on there Reg! Why are you reporting a post that says nothing is changing?

The answer, dear readers, is that back in January Microsoft announced it would not support Windows 7 and 8 on new CPUs. The effect of that change is to just-about-herd-users to Windows 10

Users haven't reacted well to that edict, rather reasonably seeing as it deprives them of choices.

El Reg suspects that a few have therefore asked if Microsoft plans to do the same with Windows server, as the post above kicks off by stating “Over the past several weeks, the Windows Server team has received a number of inquiries regarding certification and support for certain hardware platforms.”

Microsoft's answer is nothing changes. Or as the post puts it, “... Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 will transition to extended support on 1/10/2018. Per our policy we would allow new system submissions for Windows Server 2012 and 2012 R2 to continue up to this date, including the forthcoming Intel Xeon E3 (Skylake) family of processors.”

In other words, Windows Server users aren't being herded to new hardware, or to Windows Server 2016 or to Azure.

And a good job too, because asking users to mess with their PC fleets means a lot of work. Asking users to mess with their server fleets is inflicting business-halting and very expensive projects upon customers. Ergo this somewhat odd, but also re-assuring, Microsoft post.

Microsoft probably has only itself to blame for the need to emit such a post. The Windows hardware support changes are blatantly cynical. Satya Nadella's Microsoft may be embracing Linux and the cloud enthusiastically and sincerely, but Microsoft remains utterly unafraid of muscling PC-makers and, through them, users when it suits its strategy. So while nothing's changed for now, Windows Server users surely know the time will come when Microsoft makes it plain that an upgrade will be all-but-required. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022