Bleeping Computer sued by Enigma Software over moderator's forum post

Developer hunts down critics, flings sueball


Comment Enigma Software is suing Bleeping Computer for false advertising, defamation, and related claims because of what the latter characterises as a bad review posted about its software, SpyHunter.

Bleeping Computer bills itself as "a technical support site and a self-education tool for the novice user to learn basic concepts about computer technology". Most IT people know it as the website you go to when you've got a Windows PC infected with malware.

Calling the post in question a "review" is being charitable. It is a collection of hyperlinks and statements that describe some users' problems with SpyHunter. Enigma Software disputes what is posted, and has released this statement.

The legal embroilment with Bleeping Computer is not a surprise. Enigma Software has previously lobbed legal threats at people who have badmouthed SpyHunter.

Bleeping Computer

If you work with Windows desktops, especially personal PCs, you have probably run across ComboFix. Bleeping Computer is the home of ComboFix.

Combofix is a very powerful tool for removing malware from Windows-based PCs. If not used properly, it absolutely can break your system. If you know what you're doing, it can save systems other anti-malware solutions can't touch.

In addition to Combofix, the Bleeping Computer forums are the place on the internet to figure out how to remove any piece of malware, adware, spyware or potentially unwanted programs. They are populated with experts in the careful and considered use of a wide range of anti-*ware applications, and there is always someone available who actually understands a HiJackThis log.

It would not be an exaggeration to say that Bleeping Computer is a vital part of the Internet's immune system.

Comment: Why not just cave?

Why doesn't Bleeping Computer just cave in to Enigma Software's demands? The answer is credibility. Bleeping Computer is what it is because it has established and maintained a particular reputation that is critical when dealing with malware, especially when ransomware such as CryptoLocker can bring an entire network to its knees in short order.

If Bleeping Computer kowtows to Enigma Software's demands, then reviews, recommendation and advice from Bleeping Computer instantly become suspect. How can a reader know if information was added or subtracted through legal coercion?

Should Enigma Software's tactics prove successful, another issue must be considered. If independent sites can be bullied into submission because they can't afford the legal fees to defend themselves, any developer willing to flex some legal muscle can legitimise their applications, no matter what their applications actually do.

The sword cuts both ways. If Enigma Software is in the right and Bleeping Computer has mischaracterised it, then Bleeping Computer's carefully built platform and reputation can have a disproportionately negative effect on Enigma Software's products.

According to Bleeping Computer, Spyhunter is said to employ aggressive advertising, coupled with some dubious auto-subscription-renewal policies and an uninstaller that supposedly does not work correctly under all circumstances. Bleeping Computer considers these all to be concerning application behaviour items.

The Register will keep an eye out for new developments. In the meantime, Bleeping Computer has launched a fundraising drive here. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Zuckerberg sued for alleged role in Cambridge Analytica data-slurp scandal
    I can prove CEO was 'personally involved in Facebook’s failure to protect privacy', DC AG insists

    Cambridge Analytica is back to haunt Mark Zuckerberg: Washington DC's Attorney General filed a lawsuit today directly accusing the Meta CEO of personal involvement in the abuses that led to the data-slurping scandal. 

    DC AG Karl Racine filed [PDF] the civil suit on Monday morning, saying his office's investigations found ample evidence Zuck could be held responsible for that 2018 cluster-fsck. For those who've put it out of mind, UK-based Cambridge Analytica harvested tens of millions of people's info via a third-party Facebook app, revealing a – at best – somewhat slipshod handling of netizens' privacy by the US tech giant.

    That year, Racine sued Facebook, claiming the social network was well aware of the analytics firm's antics yet failed to do anything meaningful until the data harvesting was covered by mainstream media. Facebook repeatedly stymied document production attempts, Racine claimed, and the paperwork it eventually handed over painted a trail he said led directly to Zuck. 

    Continue reading
  • Florida's content-moderation law kept on ice, likely unconstitutional, court says
    So cool you're into free speech because that includes taking down misinformation

    While the US Supreme Court considers an emergency petition to reinstate a preliminary injunction against Texas' social media law HB 20, the US Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals on Monday partially upheld a similar injunction against Florida's social media law, SB 7072.

    Both Florida and Texas last year passed laws that impose content moderation restrictions, editorial disclosure obligations, and user-data access requirements on large online social networks. The Republican governors of both states justified the laws by claiming that social media sites have been trying to censor conservative voices, an allegation that has not been supported by evidence.

    Multiple studies addressing this issue say right-wing folk aren't being censored. They have found that social media sites try to take down or block misinformation, which researchers say is more common from right-leaning sources.

    Continue reading
  • US-APAC trade deal leaves out Taiwan, military defense not ruled out
    All fun and games until the chip factories are in the crosshairs

    US President Joe Biden has heralded an Indo-Pacific trade deal signed by several nations that do not include Taiwan. At the same time, Biden warned China that America would help defend Taiwan from attack; it is home to a critical slice of the global chip industry, after all. 

    The agreement, known as the Indo-Pacific Economic Framework (IPEF), is still in its infancy, with today's announcement enabling the United States and the other 12 participating countries to begin negotiating "rules of the road that ensure [US businesses] can compete in the Indo-Pacific," the White House said. 

    Along with America, other IPEF signatories are Australia, Brunei, India, Indonesia, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, New Zealand, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam. Combined, the White House said, the 13 countries participating in the IPEF make up 40 percent of the global economy. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022