Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Gartner to FBI: Stop bullying Apple and the tech industry

Big Data applied to metadata is a lesser evil than back doors, analyst argues

Gartner veep and distinguished analyst Avivah Litan has told the FBI to “stop bullying Apple and the technology industry around” with regard to that iPhone.

Litan writes that San Bernardino killer Syed Farook is known to have destroyed two private phones, so is unlikely to have sloppily left evidence on his work iPhone.

She also says a former intelligence officer has suggested to her that using carriers' metadata would likely be a better source of evidence than anything on that iPhone, which she theorises would have been on Farook's person at the same time as he carried his private phones. Carrier records, she writes, would therefore record which cell towers all three of the killer's phones touched, making it possible to track his movements without cracking the iPhone. Metadata listing the numbers Farook called from his private phones would yield information about any associates. Times when the private phones disappeared from the network – presumably to stop making metadata – would also give investigators hints.

“Intelligence has become a data science job,” she writes. “Here’s how my colleague summed it up: 'the daily challenge of the modern intelligence officer is to link data coming from human intelligence, signal intelligence, visual intelligence, financial intelligence, cyber intelligence… in part to make up for gaps that encrypted data communications and lack of associated metadata creates'.”

Litan doesn't offer proof that the FBI isn't using such techniques, but nonetheless concludes that “There’s plenty of data out there for the FBI to work with.”

“I wish they would stop bullying Apple and the technology industry around and spend their time and energy instead on figuring out how to rise to the challenge.”

Around the world, metadata retention regimes are advanced with arguments that metadata is an essential investigation tool. Litan clearly agrees with that, suggesting it preferable to backdoor-able devices. What do you think? ®

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like