Docker may be the dumbest thing you do today

Welcome to the enterprise minefield

It’s clear that Docker is on a tear as it ushers in a brave new world of DevOps. What’s less clear is whether this is a good idea. At least, today.

After all, for most enterprises, most of the time, Docker and its container peers are simply not ready for primetime, assuming “primetime” means “standard enterprise apps.” While it seems certain Docker will come to displace stodgier alternatives like VMware in the future, we’re nowhere near that future today.

The Docker numbers don’t add up

It’s not hard to find startup vendors like Datadog that claim “real Docker adoption is up 5X in one year.” While true of Datadog’s customer base, which jumped from 1.8 per cent adoption in September 2014 to 8.3 per cent adoption by September 2015, Datadog’s cloud monitoring-as-a-service isn’t focused on large enterprises.

In other words, Datadog’s “eight surprising facts about real Docker adoption”, though widely recycled, don’t really reflect “real Docker adoption” among the Global 2000.

Ditto StackEngine’s State Of Containers Survey 2015, given the company’s focus on DevOps and Docker definitionally pigeon-holes it as a still-nascent IT operations vendor. (By the way, that survey found that more than 70 per cent of respondents are either using Docker or evaluating it in their organization. Gonzo!)

Perhaps a closer read on the enterprise comes from RightScale’s State of the Cloud report, which found that Docker has notched 29 per cent within enterprises, with another 38 per cent making plans to embrace Docker. Yet even here adoption can (and probably does) mean “someone, somewhere in the organisation has spun up a few Docker containers.”

Finally, a much better read on Docker momentum comes from 451 Research analyst Donnie Berkholz, who finds that 22.5 per cent of cloud-using organisations have Docker running in production. That’s a pretty hefty number for a relatively new technology, but those italics reflect an important qualifier:

“Much of enterprise IT today is stuck 10 years behind the state-of-the-art in cloud technology,” as former AppFog chief executive Lucas Carlson declares.

Enterprise inertia blocks Docker nirvana

Oh, sure, there’s no question that cloud-hugging developers love Docker, a point that Berkholz makes clear in his report.

These same developers work for companies large and small, and are quick to jump on the Docker train. They’re the very same people that escape IT inertia by throwing apps onto Amazon Web Services or Microsoft Azure, desperate to get stuff done without having to undergo IT procurement water torture.

Yet developer love doesn’t mean mainstream adoption. Though developers are a leading indicator of enterprise adoption, they don’t necessarily reflect current adoption by stodgy enterprises that break out in hives at the mere mention of DevOps-friendly technologies like Docker.

In fact, Carlson continues, “for non-tech-native companies, 2016 is a horrible time to start adopting containers.” Why?

First, he suggests: “[T]he benefits of containers can only be achieved when the applications run within containers have been built-for-cloud.” Despite Amazon’s gargantuan cloud business, most of enterprise IT is stuck on terra firma.

Next: “[E]nterprise container technology is still half-baked,” with fledgling startups promoting them, with but precious few that will survive.

And finally: “[T]he people within many large IT organizations right now are still struggling just with the migration to virtual machines alone.” Moving immediately to containers when they’re still stuck on legacy apps is bound to result in more pain than progress.

Unfortunately, this isn’t getting any easier. As Krishnan Subramanian, senior vice president of products and strategy at CloudMunch, told me, enterprises are confused as to how to use Docker in real production scenarios. They’re also flummoxed on the subject of what is the right tooling to use, a problem that has been exacerbated by conflicting approaches introduced by Docker (the company) and Kubernetes, among others. Navigating the rapidly shifting Docker landscape is in some ways getting harder for enterprises, not easier.

And yet...

Developers as a leading indicator

“Developers love the ability to pick and choose the tools and frameworks they want to use, and tend to quickly adapt a technology they find useful. Docker is a great example of this. The same can be said of many technologies before that make their way into the corporate IT landscape," said Redmonk analyst Stephen O’Grady.

Lars Herrmann, general manager of Integrated Solutions & Container Strategy at Red Hat, concurs, informing me that much of Docker’s adoption that Red Hat sees is confined to proofs of concept or initial use of containers, and usually developer teams working on greenfield projects.

For now.

As O’Grady notes: “[T]he path through test and development is one we frequently see,” as developer darlings one day become enterprise requirements the next (e.g., virtual machines). And while containers aren’t appropriate for legacy applications, O’Grady insists:

Where we are seeing a massive difference with the use of containers is around greenfield projects. These greenfield projects generally have as close to a blank slate as you are going to find in the enterprise, and with them containers are going into production incredibly quickly – much faster than before.

So is Docker ready for your enterprise app today? Probably not. But if the developers are to be believed, they have a big role to play in defining the future of enterprise virtualization and application development. ®

Matt Asay is VP of Mobile at Adobe.

Other stories you might like

  • Mega's unbreakable encryption proves to be anything but
    Boffins devise five attacks to expose private files

    Mega, the New Zealand-based file-sharing biz co-founded a decade ago by Kim Dotcom, promotes its "privacy by design" and user-controlled encryption keys to claim that data stored on Mega's servers can only be accessed by customers, even if its main system is taken over by law enforcement or others.

    The design of the service, however, falls short of that promise thanks to poorly implemented encryption. Cryptography experts at ETH Zurich in Switzerland on Tuesday published a paper describing five possible attacks that can compromise the confidentiality of users' files.

    The paper [PDF], titled "Mega: Malleable Encryption Goes Awry," by ETH cryptography researchers Matilda Backendal and Miro Haller, and computer science professor Kenneth Paterson, identifies "significant shortcomings in Mega’s cryptographic architecture" that allow Mega, or those able to mount a TLS MITM attack on Mega's client software, to access user files.

    Continue reading
  • HashiCorp tool sniffs out configuration drift
    OK, which of those engineers tweaked the settings? When infrastructure shifts away from state defined by original code

    HashiConf HashiCorp has kicked off its Amsterdam conference with a raft of product announcements, including a worthwhile look into infrastructure drift and a private beta for HCP Waypoint.

    The first, currently in public beta, is called Drift Detection for Terraform Cloud, and is designed to keep an eye on the state of an organization's infrastructure and notify when changes occur.

    Drift Detection is a useful thing, although an organization would be forgiven for thinking that buying into the infrastructure-as-code world of Terraform should mean everything should remain in the state it was when defined.

    Continue reading
  • End of the road for biz living off free G Suite legacy edition
    Firms accustomed to freebies miffed that web giant's largess doesn't last

    After offering free G Suite apps for more than a decade, Google next week plans to discontinue its legacy service – which hasn't been offered to new customers since 2012 – and force business users to transition to a paid subscription for the service's successor, Google Workspace.

    "For businesses, the G Suite legacy free edition will no longer be available after June 27, 2022," Google explains in its support document. "Your account will be automatically transitioned to a paid Google Workspace subscription where we continue to deliver new capabilities to help businesses transform the way they work."

    Small business owners who have relied on the G Suite legacy free edition aren't thrilled that they will have to pay for Workspace or migrate to a rival like Microsoft, which happens to be actively encouraging defectors. As noted by The New York Times on Monday, the approaching deadline has elicited complaints from small firms that bet on Google's cloud productivity apps in the 2006-2012 period and have enjoyed the lack of billing since then.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022