Buying gov.UK kit via price-comparison digital portal could 'save £10bn'

G-Cloud should be model for all gov spending – report


The government could save up to £10bn per year if it were to create an "Amazon-like" procurement portal for all its purchases, similar to the underused G-Cloud, according to a think tank report.

Amazon box tipped over, propped against doorframe.Photo by Jeramey Lende via Shutterstock

Er, ID Smith? Your server arrived! Upside, you saved £34,500 on the framework price. But the cat did wee on it...
Photo by Jeramey Lende via Shutterstock

According to its Cloud 9: the future of public procurement (PDF) report by rightwing think-tank Reform, the government should "explore whether it is able to compare framework-agreed prices against prices on private marketplaces, such as Amazon Business, which allows organisations to openly buy hundreds of millions of products online.

"This could enable it to save money in the short term and negotiate better prices in the future," it said.

The report said that in South Korea 60 per cent of all procurement is currently done via online channels.

The Crown Commercial Service has said that the G-Cloud has saved 20 per cent compared with legacy contracts. However, other reports have claimed it has cut costs on average by 50 per cent.

Reform noted that in 2015, the Department for Work and Pensions cut its web-hosting costs by 90 per cent by using the G-Cloud, although this is very much at the top range of savings estimates.

However, it noted the absence of robust data on government procurement constrains accountability. The annual figure for procurement varies from £40bn-£60bn depending on the estimate.

For example, the National Audit Office recently estimated central government procurement spend was £40bn in 2012-13. However, that figure was challenged by the Spend Network and the Institute for Government, which quotes £51bn for 2012-13.

William Mosseri-Marlio, author of the report, said: "What continues to surprise people is the lack of grasp about how much it [government] spends."

He said the report did not seek out to specifically look at IT but that it had become the focus as "G-Cloud was the most novel approach". He said that was the most exciting aspect of the government's procurement agenda.

The report singled out the digitisation of procurement via the Digital Marketplace as a "success story" in government. The framework currently comprises three procurement frameworks: G-Cloud, digital services and Crown Hosting Data Centres.

Yet barriers for uptake remain. The framework, which has been running for four years, recently topped more than £1bn. In contrast, total annual procurement spend on IT in the public sector is thought to be £16bn.

Of the G-Cloud sales to date, three-quarters have gone on "specialist cloud services" rather than off-the-shelf cloudy IT services, suggesting government is still a long way from procurement reform.

The report noted that one senior government official interviewed for the paper explained that departments were anxious about using the Digital Marketplace because civil servants were unsure of its legality – exemplifying a chronic “risk aversion” and lack of understanding. These are barriers the Government must address if it is to build a successful digital procurement operation. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021