7,800 people's biometric data held on police anti-terrorism database

It's a lot, right? Loads deleted before cops investigate. Feel better?


The British plod is not only holding onto the biometrics data of 7,800 subjects of counter-terrorism investigations – most of whom have never been charged with an offence – it is also losing information on some suspects before they've been assessed as a national security risk, the Biometrics Commissioner revealed today.

In his 119-page annual report, Alastair MacGregor QC noted (PDF) that "it seems likely that a significant number of biometric records have been, or will have to be, deleted even though there may well have been good reasons for keeping them on national security grounds."

This was due to the Home Office's delays in producing a biometrics strategy, he wrote. This has led to the inconsistent uptake of guidance introduced in 2012, which meant that time allowed to retain the data belonging to subjects of national security inquiries by the police had expired before national security determinations (NSDs) could be made. Once an application for an NSD is made, the police are given an extension to the time they are allowed to keep it.

Under existing guidance, once the police have made the decision to take “no further action” against an arrested individual with no previous convictions, the biometric material taken from them should be destroyed/deleted within a matter of days. About 55 per cent of the 7,800 people whose data was being held as of October 2015 have never been charged with or convicted of any "recordable offence", according to the report.

Such protections for unconvicted individuals were introduced with the Protections of Freedoms Act 2012 (PoFA). However, a chief constable is still able to extend the time that their material is held using an NSD, which it the commissioner's statutory duty is to examine and approve.

The commissioner announced that 217 applications were made for NSDs by 31 October 2015, with 117 being approved and sent to the Commissioner. MacGregor reported that he in turn only approved 73 of these requests as several were made outside of the time limits for the application, others had been approved by insufficiently senior officers.

Ahead of PoFA coming into effect, the police deleted more than three million DNA and fingerprint records from the national databases. Despite this, there has been a whopping 20 per cent net increase in the number of biometrics details being held on the national counter-terror databases since the commencement of PoFA.

According to the commissioner, the UK's counter-terror databases “have evolved without there being in place the sort of comprehensive and clearly documented governance arrangements, policies and protocols that one might reasonably expect.”

In his previous report, the Commissioner noted that legacy material held on those databases was being removed, and a deadline had been set for 31 October 2015. This deadline was not met, and has now been extended through to 31 October 2016.

144. The full scale and continuing nature of the problems caused by delays in the NSD process have only recently become apparent and I have been assured that further work is being done as a matter of urgency to prevent such problems occurring again and to mitigate their consequences. I am keeping that work – and the issue of delays in the NSD process more generally – under close and active review.

This is not the only ongoing delay, as not only is the Home Office's promised biometrics strategy three years late, but it has failed to lay the Commissioner's report before Parliament for three months.

As the Commissioner wrote: "Since I submitted my Report to the Home Secretary on 18 December 2015 I have had numerous meetings about these problems with representatives of the Metropolitan Police. As I indicated in my Report I will continue to keep these problems – and the urgent work that is being done by the Metropolitan Police in relation to them – under close and active review." ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021