Infosec bods pop mobile money crypto by 'sniffing' e-mag radiation

Low-cost attack just needs a $2 magnetic probe and a USB sound card

Researchers have broken the encryption schemes used in mobile money transfers by “sniffing” electromagnetic radiation from smartphones.

The work, by researchers from the Check Point Institute for Information Security at Tel Aviv University and the University of Adelaide, offers further evidence that TEMPEST-style side channel attacks are no longer just the preserve of Mission: Impossible and three-letter spy agencies.

Crypto software used to protect sensitive data on mobile phones uses a digital signature algorithm called ECDSA (Elliptic Curve Digital Signature Algorithm). Boffins found that this algorithm unintentionally exposes the cryptographic keys, when used on a mobile device, because of changes in electromagnetic radiation, as well as in power consumption, depending on the data being encrypted.

In a paper, titled ECDSA Key Extraction from Mobile Devices via Nonintrusive Physical Side Channels, the researchers (Daniel Genkin, Lev Pachmanov, Itamar Pipman, Eran Tromer, and Yuval Yarom) explain how secret decryption keys in might be harvested through a passive attack using low-cost hardware followed by automated number crunching.

We show that modern cryptographic software on mobile phones, implementing the ECDSA digital signature algorithm, may inadvertently expose its secret keys through physical side channels: electromagnetic radiation and power consumption which fluctuate in a way that depends on secret information during the cryptographic computation. An attacker can non-invasively measure these physical effects using a $2 magnetic probe held in proximity to the device, or an improvised USB adapter connected to the phone's USB cable, and a USB sound card.

Using such measurements, we were able to fully extract secret signing keys from OpenSSL and CoreBitcoin running on iOS devices. We also showed partial key leakage from OpenSSL running on Android and from iOS's CommonCrypto.

The research shows that hackers might be able to circumvent cryptographic security for mobile devices using a cheap and straightforward attack. Miscreants could steal sensitive information by using a simple probe that measures electromagnetic radiation. Alternatively, hackers could harvest info after tricking prospective marks into hooking up an improvised adapter to a phone’s USB cable.

Neither technique necessitates any coding skill s as such.

The electromagnetic signal is measured using a magnetic probe, and digitised by a sound card, a software-defined radio, or a lab-grade sampling card. Extracted signals are then run through a digital signalling processing rig in order to recover keys.

“Our methodology includes physical signal acquisition from mobile devices (phones and tablet), signal processing for signal extraction and enhancement using Singular Spectrum Analysis, and a lattice-based algorithm for recovering the secret signing key by aggregating partial information learned from many randomised signing operations,” the researchers explain.

Mounting a crypto attack on an iPhone 4 using an improvised EM probe.

ECDSA is used in many applications such as Bitcoin wallets and Apple Pay. That means these applications, especially those that rely on vulnerable versions of OpenSSL, CoreBitcoin or iOS, might expose their users to low-cost physical attacks, leading to theft of signing credentials and subsequent unauthorised transactions or false authentication. Smartphone users of Bitcoin wallets – or even Apple Pay accounts – are, therefore, at risk of potential attack.

The same team of researchers previously demonstrated how stray electromagnetic leaks could be used to harvest crypto keys from Pcs, as well as an earlier technique for lifting RSA keys simply by listening to the noises a computer makes. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Venezuelan cardiologist charged with designing and selling ransomware
    If his surgery was as bad as his opsec, this chap has caused a lot of trouble

    The US Attorney’s Office has charged a 55-year-old cardiologist with creating and selling ransomware and profiting from revenue-share agreements with criminals who deployed his product.

    A complaint [PDF] filed on May 16th in the US District Court, Eastern District of New York, alleges that Moises Luis Zagala Gonzalez – aka “Nosophoros,” “Aesculapius” and “Nebuchadnezzar” – created a ransomware builder known as “Thanos”, and ransomware named “Jigsaw v. 2”.

    The self-taught coder and qualified cardiologist advertised the ransomware in dark corners of the web, then licensed it ransomware to crooks for either $500 or $800 a month. He also ran an affiliate network that offered the chance to run Thanos to build custom ransomware, in return for a share of profits.

    Continue reading
  • China reveals its top five sources of online fraud
    'Brushing' tops the list, as quantity of forbidden content continue to rise

    China’s Ministry of Public Security has revealed the five most prevalent types of fraud perpetrated online or by phone.

    The e-commerce scam known as “brushing” topped the list and accounted for around a third of all internet fraud activity in China. Brushing sees victims lured into making payment for goods that may not be delivered, or are only delivered after buyers are asked to perform several other online tasks that may include downloading dodgy apps and/or establishing e-commerce profiles. Victims can find themselves being asked to pay more than the original price for goods, or denied promised rebates.

    Brushing has also seen e-commerce providers send victims small items they never ordered, using profiles victims did not create or control. Dodgy vendors use that tactic to then write themselves glowing product reviews that increase their visibility on marketplace platforms.

    Continue reading
  • Oracle really does owe HPE $3b after Supreme Court snub
    Appeal petition as doomed as the Itanic chips at the heart of decade-long drama

    The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear Oracle's appeal to overturn a ruling ordering the IT giant to pay $3 billion in damages for violating a decades-old contract agreement.

    In June 2011, back when HPE had not yet split from HP, the biz sued Oracle for refusing to add Itanium support to its database software. HP alleged Big Red had violated a contract agreement by not doing so, though Oracle claimed it explicitly refused requests to support Intel's Itanium processors at the time.

    A lengthy legal battle ensued. Oracle was ordered to cough up $3 billion in damages in a jury trial, and appealed the decision all the way to the highest judges in America. Now, the Supreme Court has declined its petition.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022