SoftLayer reveals per-CPU VMware pricing

Hybrid hyper-convergence, anyone?


SoftLayer's pricing for VMware-as-a-service has emerged and the IBM outfit has scored a deal for per-CPU licences.

VMware and SoftLayer teamed up earlier this year in a deal that looked good for Virtzilla which, having more-or-less abandoned ambitions to build its own globe-spanning cloud, recognised that SoftLayer could get it to scale as well as anyone. SoftLayer, for its part, quite liked Virtzilla's original cloud plan of giving dedicated VMware users an end-to-end vSphere experience.

There's two items of note in SoftLayer's VMware offering.

The first is that it now goes beyond vSphere Enterprise Plus 6.0. Some time in 2016's second quarter you'll also be able to rent vRealize Operations in most variants, vRealize Log Insight, VMware Integrated OpenStack, Site Recovery Manager and vRealize Automation.

Intriguingly, SoftLayer will also offer VSAN-as-service, in three tiers (0-20TB, 21-64TB and 65-124TB). El Reg's virtualisation desk finds that offer intriguing because the idea of a virtual SAN in a cloud seems like one navel-gaze too many. Let's also remember that of late VMware has been pushing VSAN as its principal hyperconverged offering. Yet SoftLayer's emphasising storage capability. Even with that little nugget of dissonance, ponder the idea of hyperconverged systems now stretching into hybrid hyperconverged across on-premises bit barns and the cloud.

The second item of note in SoftLayer's announcement is a move to per-CPU licensing and claims it's th only cloud able to do so and thinks it is a decent idea as it “allows customers to more accurately budget how much they spend”. The company currently offers vSphere at US$85 per CPU per month.

VMware has more than 4,000 cloud and/or hosting partners, so forgive us if we don't verify SoftLayer's claims. If correct, SoftLayer will if nothing else get VMware users to crack open spreadsheets galore to test the lower-cost claim.

More interesting that Excel syntax, by far, is whether other VMware cloud collaborators decide to match SoftLayer's plans. Or if VMware lets them. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Millions of people's info stolen from MGM Resorts dumped on Telegram for free
    Meanwhile, Twitter coughs up $150m after using account security contact details for advertising

    Miscreants have dumped on Telegram more than 142 million customer records stolen from MGM Resorts, exposing names, postal and email addresses, phone numbers, and dates of birth for any would-be identity thief.

    The vpnMentor research team stumbled upon the files, which totaled 8.7 GB of data, on the messaging platform earlier this week, and noted that they "assume at least 30 million people had some of their data leaked." MGM Resorts, a hotel and casino chain, did not respond to The Register's request for comment.

    The researchers reckon this information is linked to the theft of millions of guest records, which included the details of Twitter's Jack Dorsey and pop star Justin Bieber, from MGM Resorts in 2019 that was subsequently distributed via underground forums.

    Continue reading
  • DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers
    Meanwhile, Tails 5.0 users told to stop what they're doing over Firefox flaw

    DuckDuckGo promises privacy to users of its Android, iOS browsers, and macOS browsers – yet it allows certain data to flow from third-party websites to Microsoft-owned services.

    Security researcher Zach Edwards recently conducted an audit of DuckDuckGo's mobile browsers and found that, contrary to expectations, they do not block Meta's Workplace domain, for example, from sending information to Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains.

    Specifically, DuckDuckGo's software didn't stop Microsoft's trackers on the Workplace page from blabbing information about the user to Bing and LinkedIn for tailored advertising purposes. Other trackers, such as Google's, are blocked.

    Continue reading
  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022