FBI ends second iPhone fight after someone, um, 'remembers' the PIN

Feds backing away from effort to set legal precedent


For the second time, the FBI has dropped a legal attempt to force Apple to unlock an iPhone at the last minute.

Earlier this month, the FBI backed away from the high-profile San Bernardino case the day before it was due in court by claiming it had paid a third party (apparently $1.2m) to unlock the phone.

This time it's a case in Brooklyn, New York, and the FBI sent a single-page letter [PDF] claiming that someone had given them the code just days before the Feds were due in court to argue their case.

"Yesterday evening, an individual provided the passcode to the iPhone at issue in this case. Late last night, the government used that passcode by hand and gained access to the iPhone," says the letter. "Accordingly, the government no longer needs Apple's assistance to unlock the iPhone, and withdraws its application."

The letter does not state who the individual is, although it was almost certainly the owner of the phone – drug dealer Jun Feng. Feng had previously told the court he could not remember the code.

In an almost identical strategy to the San Bernardino case, the FBI applied to the court under the All Writs Act claiming that it gave it the authority to force Apple to find a way to unlock the phone.

1-1 or is it 2-0?

In the San Bernardino case, the application was approved, prompting Apple to refuse to comply with it, and that led to an explosive public fight between the two that has generated a nationwide discussion about encryption and access to electronic devices.

In the Brooklyn case, magistrate judge James Orenstein decided that the FBI did not have the authority to demand that Apple assist it, and wrote a damning opinion that argued: "The implications of the government's position are so far-reaching – both in terms of what it would allow today and what it implies about Congressional intent in 1789 – as to produce impermissibly absurd results." The FBI appealed the decision.

Feng has since pled guilty to drug dealing and is due to be sentenced. Why he suddenly remembered the code to his phone is unclear, but given the spotlight on the issue and the fact that the FBI is backing away from its effort to set a legal precedent, it's fair to assume that Feng's attorney saw an opportunity prior to sentencing to gain a little leverage.

By withdrawing its appeal to judge Orenstein's decision by claiming the issue is now moot, the FBI does not formally lose its All Writs Act argument, but the judgment will still stand, as the San Bernardino decision stands.

With Apple taking a fierce public stance on the issue, with public opinion split, with Washington criticizing the FBI's approach, and with Congress indicating that it is prepared to get sucked into the issue, the FBI has clearly decided the best thing to do right now is get out the spotlight and work on a different strategy. ®


Other stories you might like

  • Apple may have to cough up $1bn to Brits in latest iPhone Batterygate claim
    Lawsuit took its time, just like your older iOS handset

    Another day, another legal claim against Apple for deliberately throttling the performance of its iPhones to save battery power.

    This latest case was brought by Justin Gutmann, who has asked the UK's Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) to approve a collective action that could allow as many as 25 million Brits to claim compensation from the American technology giant. He claims the iGiant secretly degraded their smartphones' performance to make the battery power last longer.

    Apple may therefore have to cough up an eye-popping £768 million ($927 million), Gutmann's lawyers estimated, Bloomberg first reported this week.

    Continue reading
  • Workers win vote to form first-ever US Apple Store union
    Results set to be ratified by labor board by end of the week

    Workers at an Apple Store in Towson, Maryland have voted to form a union, making them the first of the iGiant's retail staff to do so in the United States.

    Out of 110 eligible voters, 65 employees voted in support of unionization versus 33 who voted against it. The organizing committee, known as the Coalition of Organized Retail Employees (CORE), has now filed to certify the results with America's National Labor Relations Board. Members joining this first-ever US Apple Store union will be represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM).

    "I applaud the courage displayed by CORE members at the Apple store in Towson for achieving this historic victory," IAM's international president Robert Martinez Jr said in a statement on Saturday. "They made a huge sacrifice for thousands of Apple employees across the nation who had all eyes on this election."

    Continue reading
  • Apple’s M2 chip isn’t a slam dunk, but it does point to the future
    The chip’s GPU and neural engine could overshadow Apple’s concession on CPU performance

    Analysis For all the pomp and circumstance surrounding Apple's move to homegrown silicon for Macs, the tech giant has admitted that the new M2 chip isn't quite the slam dunk that its predecessor was when compared to the latest from Apple's former CPU supplier, Intel.

    During its WWDC 2022 keynote Monday, Apple focused its high-level sales pitch for the M2 on claims that the chip is much more power efficient than Intel's latest laptop CPUs. But while doing so, the iPhone maker admitted that Intel has it beat, at least for now, when it comes to CPU performance.

    Apple laid this out clearly during the presentation when Johny Srouji, Apple's senior vice president of hardware technologies, said the M2's eight-core CPU will provide 87 percent of the peak performance of Intel's 12-core Core i7-1260P while using just a quarter of the rival chip's power.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022