Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Transfer techies at SWIFT tell Bangladesh Bank: Don't shift blame for $81m cyberheist

Calls it out over 'basic password protection'

SWIFT has firmly rejected Bangladeshi claims that mistakes on its part are to blame after $81m was looted from Bangladesh’s central bank.

Bangladeshi officials claimed earlier this week that technicians from SWIFT had introduced vulnerabilities into the bank's network when connecting a Real-Time Gross Settlement (RTGS) system to SWIFT’s inter-bank financial transaction messaging system.

SWIFT dismissed these allegations as an attempt to shift blame for February’s massive cyber-heist.

SWIFT rejects the false, inaccurate and misleading allegations made by Bangladesh Bank and Bangladesh Police's Criminal Investigation Department (CID) officials to Reuters. The accusations have no basis in fact.

SWIFT was not responsible for any of the issues cited by the officials, or party to the related decisions. As a SWIFT user like any other, Bangladesh Bank is responsible for the security of its own systems interfacing with the SWIFT network and their related environment – starting with basic password protection practices – in much the same way as they are responsible for their other internal security considerations.

A meeting between Bangladesh Bank and New York Federal Reserve Bank officials in Basel, Switzerland is due to take place later today. The bank’s security issues as well as attempts to recover looted security funds are expected to top the agenda.

As well as network infrastructure weaknesses, the hackers behind the heist used custom malware specifically created to target SWIFT. The code even adjusted the SWIFT system’s printed reports to hide fraudulent transfers from the Bangladesh central bank account at the New York Federal Reserve Bank.

Hackers lifted the Bangladesh central bank's keys before forging messages on SWIFT instructing funds to be transferred to accounts under their control, as previously reported.

The Bangladeshi incident is not a one-off. Other thefts of “operator credentials” have happened before, SWIFT previously confirmed. In response to the Bangladeshi incident, the banking organisation pushed a mandatory security update towards customers to “help them enhance their security and to spot inconsistencies in their local database records”.

Several experts welcomed the changes but argued that they fail to go far enough, arguing that wider use of two factor-authentication, among other security controls, is needed. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like