Deloitte coughs up $11m to end claims it ripped off US govt with IT work

Consultancy giant opens wallet, pulls out some notes, tells Feds to go away

Deloitte will pay $11m to settle allegations it overcharged the US government for IT services.

The US Department of Justice (DoJ) said on Tuesday it has struck a deal with Deloitte, which was accused of – and we're paraphrasing, here – treating Uncle Sam's General Services Administration (GSA) as a bottomless pit of cash.

The GSA is in charge of dishing out contracts to the private sector for the installation and support of hardware and services for federal agencies. The DoJ claimed that between 2006 and 2012, Deloitte failed to give the GSA a fair price for the IT services it had promised in a 2000 contract.

Part of that services contract, the DoJ said, was an assurance that Deloitte would charge the government the same rates it gives private companies, and lower the amount it bills the GSA to reflect discounts given in the private sector.

In other words, Deloitte was not allowed to treat taxpayers as an endless well of money – whatever it charged private biz, it had to invoice the US government the same. In charging the government agencies more than their private-sector counterparts, the DoJ said, Deloitte had violated the False Claims Act.

"Contractors are expected to deal fairly with federal agencies when receiving taxpayer funds," said Benjamin Mizer, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General and head of the Justice Department's civil division. "As this settlement demonstrates, we will take action against those who knowingly fail to live up to the terms of their government contracts."

Under the terms of the settlement, Deloitte will agree to pay the DoJ $11.38m. In exchange, the DoJ will drop its allegations and Deloitte will not have to admit to any liability in the case. Deloitte's revenue for 2015 was $35.2bn.

Deloitte is far from the first company to be accused of gouging the government on services contracts. In the past, industry heavyweights including NetApp, Oracle and the late Sun Microsystems have been accused of overcharging Uncle Sam for services rendered. ®

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • International operation takes down Russian RSOCKS botnet
    $200 a day buys you 90,000 victims

    A Russian operated botnet known as RSOCKS has been shut down by the US Department of Justice acting with law enforcement partners in Germany, the Netherlands and the UK. It is believed to have compromised millions of computers and other devices around the globe.

    The RSOCKS botnet functioned as an IP proxy service, but instead of offering legitimate IP addresses leased from internet service providers, it was providing criminals with access to the IP addresses of devices that had been compromised by malware, according to a statement from the US Attorney’s Office in the Southern District of California.

    It seems that RSOCKS initially targeted a variety of Internet of Things (IoT) devices, such as industrial control systems, routers, audio/video streaming devices and various internet connected appliances, before expanding into other endpoints such as Android devices and computer systems.

    Continue reading
  • Feds raid dark web market selling data on 24 million Americans
    SSNDOB sold email addresses, passwords, credit card numbers, SSNs and more

    US law enforcement has shut down another dark web market, seizing and dismantling SSNDOB, a site dealing in stolen personal information.

    Led by the IRS' criminal investigation division, the DOJ, and the FBI, the investigation gained control of four of SSNDOB's domains, hobbling its ability to generate cash. The agents said it raked in more than $19 million since coming online in 2015.

    Continue reading
  • US won’t prosecute ‘good faith’ security researchers under CFAA
    Well, that clears things up? Maybe not

    The US Justice Department has directed prosecutors not to charge "good-faith security researchers" with violating the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) if their reasons for hacking are ethical — things like bug hunting, responsible vulnerability disclosure, or above-board penetration testing.

    Good-faith, according to the policy [PDF], means using a computer "solely for purposes of good-faith testing, investigation, and/or correction of a security flaw or vulnerability."

    Additionally, this activity must be "carried out in a manner designed to avoid any harm to individuals or the public, and where the information derived from the activity is used primarily to promote the security or safety of the class of devices, machines, or online services to which the accessed computer belongs, or those who use such devices, machines, or online services."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022