Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

So. Why don't people talk to invisible robots in public?

Some questions just answer themselves

Wilson: Who's Harvey?
Miss Kelly: A white rabbit, six feet tall
Wilson: Six feet?
Elwood P. Dowd: Six feet three and a half inches. Now let's stick to the facts

A shock survey that nobody could possibly have anticipated reveals that people don’t want to talk to an invisible rabbit robot when they’re out in public.

The survey quizzed two sets of over 1,000 early technology adopters in the UK and the USA over their use of imaginary friends – aka voice-activated personal digital assistants – including Siri, Cortana and Google Now. The survey shows high awareness of the assistants and high takeup when in a car, but only six per cent use them at work, and only 1.3 per cent use them in public.

A fifth of non-users cited embarrassment as their prime reason for not quizzing a disembodied voice.

The shock is really no shock at all, of course. Academic research into the topic by psychologists has confirmed as much. And embarrassment may not even be the biggest inhibition.

Research published in 2014 and co-authored by a Samsung researcher now at Google and Microsoft's Kim-Phuong Vu, showed that users needed to feel their environment was private before using a “VAPDA” such as Siri. It gets more interesting.

Even then, privacy concerns were paramount. Yet there is no more or less privacy talking to a VAPDA than there is typing into Google. To the user, however, the voice assistant "feels" less private. By talking, the user is bringing with them the context of a social situation, where people can eavesdrop, or get annoyed.

Practical considerations also come into play: the quality of speech recognition falls dramatically in a noisy public environment. At one time any one-sided conversation was considered intrusive, but is now generally socially acceptable. However, the declarative speech required using a Siri or Google Now may never cross that threshold.

Which means that all that money being poured into AI-powered speech recognition may not get the return on investments its backers hope.

More here. ®

 

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like