Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customise your settings, hit “Customise Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

Torrent is a word, and you can't ban words, rules French court

Google, Microsoft won't have to block searches for 'les torrents'


The High Court of Paris has decided there's a limit to France's unpopular anti-copying regime: Google and Bing can't be required to block the word “torrent” from their search results just because BitTorrent is sometimes used for piracy.

The case was brought by the Syndicat National de l'édition Phonographique, France's record industry association, on behalf of a trio of French artists – Kendji Girac, Shy’m, and Christophe Willem. SNEP wanted to use Article L336-2 of France's intellectual property law to force Google and Microsoft to delete searches that included both “torrent” and any of the artists' names.

That article is a catch-all for copyright owners, who can ask a judge to impose all appropriate measures to prevent an infringement. It seems, however, the High Court in Paris didn't think filtering “torrent” in all of France, the Wallis and Futuna islands, New Caledonia and the French Southern and Antarctic territories was appropriate.

In the Google case, the court found that SNEP was acting on behalf of only three artists, rather than for all of its members. The case would “not protect the interests of the entire profession, but ensure the protection of individual interests of members who produce these three artists”, the court found.

In the Microsoft action, the court stated the requests made by SNEP were too broad: “they do not concern an identified site, but all sites accessed by the requested terms, regardless of the identification and even determining the content of the site … The measures sought are similar to general surveillance measure and could cause the blocking of legitimate sites.”

Back in 2012, France's Supreme Court ruled that words like “torrent” had to be removed from Google Autocomplete and Instant, but refrained from having them blocked entirely.

The judgements award costs (yet to be calculated) against SNEP in both cases, along with €15,000 extra to Microsoft, and €10,000 for Google.

French speakers can find the Google judgement here (PDF) and the Microsoft judgement here (PDF). ®


Other stories you might like

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022