Did Donald Trump really just ask Russia to hack the US govt? Yes, he did

And now denies it. But hey: News cycle!


In the latest of a series of implausibly appalling statements, Republican presidential nightmare Donald Trump encouraged the Russian government to hack into the servers of US government officials in order to provide him political ammunition against his Democratic rival.

Speaking at a press conference on Wednesday, Trump said: "Russia, if you're listening, I hope you're able to find the 30,000 emails that are missing. I think you will probably be rewarded mightily by our press."

The comment caused dismay even among reporters who have grown used to Trump's outrageous off-the-cuff comments, typically designed to make him the focus of that day's news cycle.

Trump was referring to the recent scandal over the release of confidential emails from key staffers at the Democratic National Committee (DNC), which resulted in the resignation of its chair, and was trying to tie it into the controversy over Hillary Clinton's private email server that she used while secretary of state.

The DNC, and seemingly the US government's intelligence services, believe the hack was carried out by groups sponsored by the Russian government, with the stolen data then provided to controversial document archive website WikiLeaks.

Received wisdom is that the leak is a calculated effort by the Russian government to undermine Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton – who has taken a firm line with Russia internationally – and so increase the chances of Donald Trump assuming the presidency. The saga has put a spotlight on Trump's praise of Russian president Vladimir Putin and a comment he made about Putin in which he said: "I hope he likes me."

Encouraging a foreign government to act against the interests of the US government was seen as a further sign of how Donald Trump puts personal ambition ahead of national interest, however.

It also comes after dismay last week at comments he made suggesting that he would not stick to Article 5 of the NATO treaty that requires the United States (and all other signatories) to come to the aid of a NATO nation if it is attacked.

Asked specifically about the risk of Russia invading a NATO country in a similar way to which it annexed part of Ukraine in 2014, Trump said he would come to their aid only if they had "fulfilled their obligations to us" – meaning paid their financial dues to NATO.

And repeat

Faced with outrage over his encouragement of the Russian government to hack into US government official servers, Trump fell back into a well-worn path of behavior: he "doubled-down" on his statement by tweeting a slightly modified version of what he said, and then had his spokesman deny that he meant what he actually said.

As if it matters, here are both statements from Trump and his senior comms advisor Jason Miller:

Trump: If Russia or any other country or person has Hillary Clinton's 33,000 illegally deleted emails, perhaps they should share them with the FBI!
Miller: To be clear, Mr. Trump did not call on, or invite, Russia or anyone else to hack Hillary Clinton's e-mails today.

In a normal election cycle, this comment, as well as literally dozens of similar statements made by Trump in the past few months, would see an effective end to his bid for the presidency.

But in 2016, Donald Trump has beaten all the odds by managing to dominate the news cycles and have the media focus almost exclusively on his comments, creating an extraordinary level of awareness and celebrity over his candidacy that has turned into active support.

The sadder truth is that with the Democratic National Convention taking place this week, Trump has not been as much a feature of the news, with much of the coverage focused on speeches given by the wife of President Obama, Michele, and husband of Hillary Clinton and former president himself, Bill Clinton.

In order to wrest back the headlines and remain in the spotlight, Trump has provided yet one more outrageous statement, guessing – possibly correctly – that his supporters put entertainment above serious questions over suitability when considering who to support for the presidency. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Share your experience: How does your organization introduce new systems?

    The answer is rarely obvious. Take part in our short poll and we'll find out together

    Reg Reader Survey The introduction of new systems into an organization is essential. If we stay still, if we continue to rely on legacy systems, if we fail to innovate – well, we (or, in reality, the company) will die. As business guru Sir John Harvey-Jones once put it: “If you are doing things the same way as two years ago, you are almost certainly doing them wrong.”

    But who should lead innovation in our companies? Who should be introducing new systems? The answer is not obvious.

    On one hand, the introduction of new systems into the business should be led by the business. In principle, the people doing the work, dealing with the suppliers, selling to the customers, are best placed to be standing up and saying: “We need the system to do X,” whether their motivation be to reduce cost, increase revenues, make products more efficiently, or even bolster our environmental credentials.

    Continue reading
  • These Rapoo webcams won't blow your mind, but they also won't break the bank

    And they're almost certainly better than a laptop jowel-cam

    Review It has been a long 20 months since Lockdown 1.0, and despite the best efforts of Google and Zoom et al to filter out the worst effects of built-in laptop webcams, a replacement might be in order for the long haul ahead.

    With this in mind, El Reg's intrepid reviews desk looked at a pair of inexpensive Rapoo webcams in search for an alternative to the horror of our Dell XPS nose-cam.

    Rapoo sent us its higher-end XW2K, a 2K 30fps device and, at the other end of the scale, the 720p XW170. Neither will break the bank, coming in at around £40 and £25 respectively from online retailers, but do include some handy features, such as autofocus and a noise cancelling microphone.

    Continue reading
  • It's one thing to have the world in your hands – what are you going to do with it?

    Google won the patent battle against ART+COM, but we were left with little more than a toy

    Column I used to think technology could change the world. Google's vision is different: it just wants you to sort of play with the world. That's fun, but it's not as powerful as it could be.

    Despite the fact that it often gives me a stomach-churning sense of motion sickness, I've been spending quite a bit of time lately fully immersed in Google Earth VR. Pop down inside a major city centre – Sydney, San Francisco or London – and the intense data-gathering work performed by Google's global fleet of scanning vehicles shows up in eye-popping detail.

    Buildings are rendered photorealistically, using the mathematics of photogrammetry to extrude three-dimensional solids from multiple two-dimensional images. Trees resolve across successive passes from childlike lollipops into complex textured forms. Yet what should feel absolutely real seems exactly the opposite – leaving me cold, as though I've stumbled onto a global-scale miniature train set, built by someone with too much time on their hands. What good is it, really?

    Continue reading
  • Why Cloud First should not have to mean Cloud Everywhere

    HPE urges 'consciously hybrid' strategy for UK public sector

    Sponsored In 2013, the UK government heralded Cloud First, a ground-breaking strategy to drive cloud adoption across the public sector. Eight years on, and much of UK public sector IT still runs on-premises - and all too often - on obsolete technologies.

    Today the government‘s message boils down to “cloud first, if you can” - perhaps in recognition that modernising complex legacy systems is hard. But in the private sector today, enterprises are typically mixing and matching cloud and on-premises infrastructure, according to the best business fit for their needs.

    The UK government should also adopt a “consciously hybrid” approach, according to HPE, The global technology company is calling for the entire IT industry to step up so that the public sector can modernise where needed and keep up with innovation: “We’re calling for a collective IT industry response to the problem,” says Russell MacDonald, HPE strategic advisor to the public sector.

    Continue reading
  • A Raspberry Pi HAT for the Lego Technic fan

    Sneaking in programming under the guise of plastic bricks

    There is good news for the intersection of Lego and Raspberry Pi fans today, as a new HAT (the delightfully named Hardware Attached on Top) will be unveiled for the diminutive computer to control Technic motors and sensors.

    Continue reading
  • Reg scribe spends week being watched by government Bluetooth wristband, emerges to more surveillance

    Home quarantine week was the price for an overseas trip, ongoing observation is the price of COVID-19

    Feature My family and I recently returned to Singapore after an overseas trip that, for the first time in over a year, did not require the ordeal of two weeks of quarantine in a hotel room.

    Instead, returning travelers are required to stay at home, wear a government-issued tracking device, and stay within range of a government-issued Bluetooth beacon at all times for a week … or else. No visitors are allowed and only a medical emergency is a ticket out. But that sounded easy compared to the hotel quarantine we endured in 2020.

    Continue reading
  • Intel teases 'software-defined silicon' with Linux kernel contribution – and won't say why

    It might enable activation of entirely new features on existing Xeon CPUs … or, you know, not

    Intel has teased a new tech it calls "Software Defined Silicon" (SDSi) but is saying almost nothing about it – and has told The Register it could amount to nothing.

    SDSi popped up around three weeks ago in a post to the Linux Kernel mailing list, in which an Intel Linux software engineer named David Box described it as "a post-manufacturing mechanism for activating additional silicon features".

    "Features are enabled through a license activation process," he wrote. "The SDSi driver provides a per-socket, ioctl interface for applications to perform three main provisioning functions." Those provisioning functions are:

    Continue reading
  • Chip manufacturers are going back to the future for automotive silicon

    Where we're going, we don't need 5nm

    Analysis Cars are gaining momentum as computers on wheels, though chip manufacturers' auto focus isn't on making components using the latest and greatest fabrication nodes.

    Instead, companies that include Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co and Globalfoundries are turning back the clock and investing billions in factories that use older manufacturing techniques to make chips for vehicles.

    The rapid digitization and electrification of cars has created a giant demand for smaller, more power-efficient auto chips, said Jim McGregor, principal analyst at Tirias Research. He added that cars don't necessarily need the latest manufacturing processes, though, and many are still using analog-based components for various functions.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021