Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Apple gets judge to hit ctrl-alt-delete on $625m FaceTime patent troll

VirnetX will have to go back to court with infringement claim

A US District Court judge has thrown out an earlier $625m verdict against Apple in a long-running patent trial over FaceTime – and ordered a new trial.

Judge Robert Schroeder of the Eastern Texas US District Court issued an order [PDF] granting Apple's motion for a retrial on the grounds that the jury was not properly instructed in the case and was prejudiced against the Cupertino consumer electronics giant.

In the notoriously plaintiff-friendly Eastern Texas district, patent-holding company VirnetX had sued Apple, alleging infringement on a pair of patents related to both FaceTime and VPNs. In 2015, a jury awarded VirnetX $625m in infringement damages after the two cases were joined together.

Shortly after the verdict, Apple filed an appeal arguing that the decision to consolidate the two patent claims into a single hearing, and to reference an earlier infringement verdict in the first case, left the jury inclined to decide against Apple and award damages unfairly.

Judge Schroeder agreed, ruling that the decision to consolidate the cases resulted in the jury going into its deliberations having already been told (based on the prior verdict) that Apple was guilty of infringement.

Because of this, he vacated the $625m award to VirnetX and ordered the trial to start all over again.

"The Court does not reach this decision lightly or without considering fully the briefing, argument of counsel and the interests of the parties in bringing this matter to a final conclusion," Schroeder wrote.

"Despite these important considerations, the Court's paramount obligation – to ensure that both sides receive a fair and impartial trial – compels this result."

The order calls for the two cases to be re-tried separately, with the first case to begin anew on September 26 of this year. ®

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like