Mastercard armours its contactless cards against relay attacks

Rest of industry still sitting on its hands over 9-year-old threat


Elements of the payment card industry have introduced a new contactless payment card security feature, designed to defend against relay attacks.

Relay attacks were first demonstrated nine years ago by a team of computer scientists Saar Drimer and Steven Murdoch.

The pair also suggested how the security flaw can be mitigated using a technique called distance bounding). Mastercard has taken up this defence, meaning its cards (at least) are protected.

“Finally the banks are now implementing this defence, though only for contactless cards (as they are more vulnerable than the contact Chip and PIN cards that were available in 2007), and so far only for MasterCard cards,” Murdoch told El Reg.

Murdoch says that although the relay attack is real it’s unclear whether or not fraud based on the security weakness has actually taken place.

“I’m not aware of any confirmed cases, other than academic experiments. However, unless this were a widespread fraud, I don’t think I would have heard about it even if it had happened,” Murdoch explained.

“There have been bank customers who have come to me or colleagues to say that they have been refused a refund for a Chip and PIN transaction that they said did not take place. In some of these cases it might have been a relay attack, but in almost every case it is never established what happened.”

“The banks have taken the position that a relay attack is unlikely and since the decision of whether a bank refunds the customer is based on the most likely explanation, the bank always presents another scenario as being the most likely (normally customer negligence),” he added.

Murdoch only found out that MasterCard had moved to defend against the relay attack because he regularly looks at the EMVCo specifications and noticed this change.

“While the new feature is far from a secret, I don’t think MasterCard are drawing attention to it,” he explained. “Now that the MasterCard specification is out I am sure the other card schemes have considered what they will do, but I have no indication of a decision.”

The security researcher has put together an article on Mastercard’s move and relay attacks more generally for the University College London information security group’s Bentham's Gaze blog, which can be found here.

Pass the baton: Relay attack [source: UCL blog post]


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021