Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Apple beats off banks' bid for access to iPhones' NFC chips

For now, anyway, as Australian regulator says it needs time to ponder a complex matter

Apple has had a partial win in its attempt to prevent banks using iPhones' NFC chips for payment services other than Apple Pay.

Four Australian banks applied to local regulators to bargain with Apple as a cartel. Apple argued against their application by claiming iThings' security would be badly compromised by allowing third-party access to their NFC chips. Apple also took a swipe at the four banks, arguing they're not really interested in opening the iPhone to competition but are instead trying to defend lucrative credit card businesses and pointing out that one of the four hadn't even signed the confidentiality agreement that would allow it to view Apple Pay's terms and conditions.

Australia's Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has now ruled on the banks' application and decided it needs more time to ponder the matter.

ACCC chairman Rod Sims said “the complexity of the issues and the limited time available” make it inadvisable to make a rapid decision.

The four banks - Bendigo and Adelaide Bank, Commonwealth Bank, NAB and Westpac - have issued a statement in which they offer no comment on the ACCC's decision but say they "will continue to be in consultation" with the regulator.

The four also point out that their application to negotiate as one has found favour from another bank and a pair of third-party payment companies.

The ACCC's Sims said the Commission will deliver a draft decision by October 2016, before embarking on public consultation. The ACCC usually reaches a final decision five to six months after receiving an application. The four banks' bid arrived in late July and Australia basically goes to the beach for a month in late December, so Vulture South imagines we'll get a decision either a week or two before Christmas or a month later.

Australia's regulators and courts are well-regarded worldwide, so the reasoning expressed in the ACCC's eventual decision will be noted by other regulators around the world. ®

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like