Notting Hill Carnival spycams: Met Police rolls out real-time live face-spotting tech

Cops are using machines to spy on us – again


London’s Metropolitan Police will trial an automated facial recognition system to identify people at this weekend's Notting Hill Carnival as the government continues to drag its feet on the use of the technology.

This is is only the second time that British cops have openly trialled live automated facial recognition (AFR) systems in the UK.

Last year, Leicestershire Police also trialled AFR at Download Festival – though this was found to not have been part of the policing plan for the event and police didn't bother assessing how effective it was after the event.

According to the Met, the AFR system at the Notting Hill Carnival “involves the use of overt cameras which scan the faces of those passing by and flag up potential matches against a database of custody images. The database has been populated with images of individuals who are forbidden from attending Carnival, as well as individuals wanted by police who it is believed may attend Carnival to commit offences.”

Speaking to The Register, the government's Surveillance Camera Commissioner, Tony Porter, said that "the Surveillance Camera Code of Practice requires relevant authorities such as Local Authorities and Police Forces to ensure they use surveillance cameras effectively, efficiently and proportionately."

"This is so communities can be sure that they are being protected by this technology rather than spied on. I would expect any organisation that is using tools like automatic facial recognition to do so transparently so members of the public know it is being used and what its use is for," explained Porter.

Even if the use of AFR complies with the code, the Met’s collection of custody images has been a greater source of controversy. In his annual report earlier this year, the Biometrics Commissioner warned that the Home Office was cruising for a lawsuit in this area, particularly after a High Court ruling in 2012, R (RMC and FJ) v MPS, in which Lord Justice Richards found:

[T]he just and appropriate order is to declare that the [Metropolitan Police's] existing policy concerning the retention of custody photographs … is unlawful. It should be clear in the circumstances that a 'reasonable further period' for revising the policy is to be measured in months, not years.

According to a Freedom of Information request made by pressure group Liberty last year, however, in the three years since the ruling the Met confessed it had only deleted 560 persons’ images because “the current I.T. system which holds MPS custody images was not designed or built to accommodate a complex retention policy.”

In response to a Parliamentary question reported in the Birmingham Mail, Baroness Williams of Trafford reported that by 15 July this year, there were “over 19 million custody images, which may include images other than of faces, uploaded by forces onto the PND (Police National Database).”

“Of these, 16,644,143 had been enrolled in the facial image recognition gallery and are searchable using automated facial recognition software,” Williams revealed – a figure representing roughly a quarter of the UK’s entire population.

This area is expected to receive enhanced attention when the Home Office publishes its long-awaited Biometrics Review, as well as its Custody Images Review. Though both of these have been completed, the Home Office has not published them, which The Register’s sources have claimed is a result of redrafting the “rubbish” reports.

The upping in the use of AFR in London follows another story last year in which The Register revealed the Met had begun buying up to 30,000 body cameras as part of its ambition to become “the most transparent police force in the world”.

In response to a request made under the Freedom of Information Act by campaigner Pippa King, the MPS claimed that its mugshot-matching facial recognition system could not be used with live footage, saying that the facial images would have to be transferred to the police’s facial recognition system after the event.

“If a match is made by the system” being used at Notting Hill Carnival, however, the Met’s officers “will be alerted and will seek to speak with the individual to verify their identity, making an arrest if necessary.” This strongly suggests that the system actually is capable of being used with live images.

The Met has promised to supply The Register with a comment. ®

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022