iPhone 7's Qualcomm, Intel soap opera dumps a carrier lock-out on us

Teardown reveals chips in new iThings, confirms love struggle in Cupertino


Analysis Love rat Apple two-times its long-suffering squeeze Qualcomm with dishy Intel – and it's going to keep the baby but only let some of us see it.

Over a cheap bottle of chardonnay one dark night in Cupertino, Intel wooed Apple with flimsy promises. The pair felt a connection (around the 1.9GHz mark) after the iPhone maker opened up about its long-distance relationship with San Diego's Qualcomm.

"I don't want to get too tied down," Apple sighed. "I'm not ready for the commitment."

"Baby, I'm here for you," said Intel.

"But you don't know anything about mobile."

"I've changed, baby, I've changed."

Apple's heart melted like a Galaxy Note 7 in a child's hand. Now, thought Intel, if only it could scheme its way further into the MacBook maker's life to wreck any plans to move from x86 to ARM.

I just can't understand why my screenwriting career hasn't taken off.

A peek inside the iPhone 7 has confirmed that Apple is using a mix of Intel and Qualcomm radio modems in the new handsets. Typically, Qualcomm provides these communications chips, which are used to connect the device wirelessly to the cellular network for calls, texts and mobile internet. Apple hates being tied down to a single component source, so it decided to give Intel a shot.

There's also the interesting dynamic of Qualcomm providing Snapdragon system-on-chips and modems to Apple's arch-rival Samsung. Couple that with Intel's desire to get its radio modem business a slice of the massive mobile world – while Intel's traditional PC world diminishes – and that Apple relies on Intel x86 processors for its desktop and laptop products, you can see why Apple let Intel in through the backdoor to its iPhone production.

We all knew it was coming. In a conference call with investment analysts in April, Qualcomm CEO Steven Mollenkopf said he was "assuming" that a major customer – cough, cough, Apple – would use a second supplier. And in July, Intel CEO Brian Krzanich said he was "concerned about getting the leading-edge momentum going for us with the 7360" – that's the XMM 7360 modem that launched in 2015.

And true enough, the XMM 7360 has turned up in some iPhone 7 and 7 Plus handsets. There's a catch: this chip doesn't support CDMA networks. So if you buy an Intel-modem phone, and you want to switch to a CDMA network, such as Sprint or Verizon in the US, you'll be out of luck. Qualcomm's X12 radio modems support CDMA so iPhones using those chips will work universally.

Luckily, there's a handy guide on Apple's website listing the two variants of the iPhone 7/7 Plus. The A1660/A1661 works with GSM and CDMA networks, sports a Qualcomm MDM9645M X12 modem chipset, and works with Verizon and Sprint in the US. The A1778/A1784 supports GSM, sports an Intel modem chipset, and works with AT&T and T-Mobile US in America.

What the Apple website doesn't mention is that if you carrier unlock an A1660/A1661, you'll be able to use it on AT&T and T-Mobile US because the Qualcomm modem inside will support those networks. But if you carrier unlock an A1778/A1784, you won't be able to use it on CDMA networks.

Basically, if you want a phone that works everywhere, get the A1660/A1661. If in doubt, check the model number against the aforementioned webpage for carrier compatibility. For what it's worth, in the UK, Apple will sell you an A1778/A1784 that supports 3, EE, O2 and Vodafone.

Intel isn't insane for leaving out CDMA support, by the way: the standard is dying, and Qualcomm owns a load of CDMA patents, so Chipzilla decided to skip it.

To further complicate things, potentially, Apple can switch out Intel's XMM 7360 in its GSM-only A1778/A1784 for the tried-and-tested Qualcomm X12 but use firmware to limit the phone to non-CDMA networks. This could happen if something goes wrong with the Intel supply – such as if the XMM 7360 isn't up to the X12's performance.

One final thought: the new iPhone 7 and 7 Plus won't support the expensive AWS-3 radio bands, aka LTE band 66, which were cleared to make way for greater mobile broadband coverage in the US.

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Tesla driver charged with vehicular manslaughter after deadly Autopilot crash

    Prosecution seems to be first of its kind in America

    A Tesla driver has seemingly become the first person in the US to be charged with vehicular manslaughter for a deadly crash in which the vehicle's Autopilot mode was engaged.

    According to the cops, the driver exited a highway in his Tesla Model S, ran a red light, and smashed into a Honda Civic at an intersection in Gardena, Los Angeles County, in late 2019. A man and woman in the second car were killed. The Tesla driver and a passenger survived and were taken to hospital.

    Prosecutors in California charged Kevin George Aziz Riad, 27, in October last year though details of the case are only just emerging, according to AP on Tuesday. Riad, a limousine service driver, is facing two counts of vehicular manslaughter, and is free on bail after pleading not guilty.

    Continue reading
  • AMD returns to smartphone graphics with new Samsung chip for your pocket computer

    We're back in black

    AMD's GPU technology is returning to mobile handsets with Samsung's Exynos 2200 system-on-chip, which was announced on Tuesday.

    The Exynos 2200 processor, fabricated using a 4nm process, has Armv9 CPU cores and the oddly named Xclipse GPU, which is an adaptation of AMD's RDNA 2 mainstream GPU architecture.

    AMD was in the handheld GPU market until 2009, when it sold the Imageon GPU and handheld business for $65m to Qualcomm, which turned the tech into the Adreno GPU for its Snapdragon family. AMD's Imageon processors were used in devices from Motorola, Panasonic, Palm and others making Windows Mobile handsets.

    Continue reading
  • Big shock: Guy who fled political violence and became rich in tech now struggles to care about political violence

    'I recognize that I come across as lacking empathy,' billionaire VC admits

    Billionaire tech investor and ex-Facebook senior executive Chamath Palihapitiya was publicly blasted after he said nobody really cares about the reported human rights abuse of Uyghur Muslims in China.

    The blunt comments were made during the latest episode of All-In, a podcast in which Palihapitiya chats to investors and entrepreneurs Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg about technology.

    The group were debating the Biden administration’s response to what's said to be China's crackdown of Uyghur Muslims when Palihapitiya interrupted and said: “Nobody cares about what’s happening to the Uyghurs, okay? ... I’m telling you a very hard ugly truth, okay? Of all the things that I care about … yes, it is below my line.”

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022