Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Brandis' boffin-busting de-anonymisation crime legislation has landed

Will Australian privacy researchers still be at risk of hard time?

Privacy and data researchers will, later today, get to see what's in the Australian government's proposed bill banning re-identification of anonymised data.

The Privacy Amendment (Reidentification Offence) Bill 2016 will be presented to the Senate by attorney-general George Brandis during today's Senate session (PDF) sometime after 2:30pm.

Brandis proposed the bill late in September, pretty much without warning.

At the time, Brandis issued a press release saying: “The amendment to the Privacy Act will create a new criminal offence of re-identifying de-identified government data. It will also be an offence to counsel, procure, facilitate, or encourage anyone to do this, and to publish or communicate any re-identified dataset.”

The proposal came hard on the heels of research by Dr Chris Culnane, Dr Benjamin Rubinstein and Dr Vanessa Teague, who demonstrated flaws in a de-identified data set published at the Federal government's “open data” site, Data.gov.au.

That data was a sample of 10 per cent of the country's Medicare providers, which the group found could be identified back to individual doctors or clinics with a trivial amount of work.

Dr Teague told The Register at the time that Brandis' bill put research at risk, since it's important for groups like hers to uncover flaws in anonymised data. ®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like