Startup dusts off rent-a-box on-premises corpse, adds ARM muscle, cloud brains

A sprinkling of Internet of Things ... and ... it's alive!

Startup Igneous Systems has re-discovered and re-imagined the idea of customers renting an externally managed system on their premises, giving it an Internet of Things (IoT) and public cloud make-over.

The new angles are that IoT devices can generate vast amounts of data which is difficult to send to a set of on-premises servers or the public cloud because transmission is too slow and/or the data is sensitive and needs to be retained on site.

Igneous's answer is to store it locally in a public cloud-like, scale-out, hyper-converged system that can run some compute processes on the data, and be managed through the cloud. Example compute workloads are auto-tagging, metadata extraction, image processing, and text analysis.

Igneous owns and operates the on-premises equipment and the customer has a capacity-based subscription pricing scheme. The systems are remotely managed and monitored through a cloud service, and there is automated cloud management processes for upgrades, troubleshooting, and failure management. Igneous claims that these functions can be performed on a mirror of incoming and outgoing data streams without slowing down low-level system functions.

The Igneous architecture utilises a microservices approach and incorporates stream processing, an event-driven framework, and container services.


Igneous nanoserver

The equipment is based on ARM-powered nano-servers, with each being a disk drive, ARM processor and Ethernet link. Igneous calls this a JBOND - Just a Bunch of Networked Drives. There is a SoC (System On Chip) with a Linux-running Marvell 32-bit Armada 370 processor, with two Cortex-A9 cores running at up to 1 GHz. Networking is via two 1 GbitE ports, and the nanoservers operate in a kind of mesh.

It reminds El Reg of Seagate's Ethernet-addressed Kinetic disk drives, except that Igneous has had its own nanoservers built and the JBOND is accessed as an S3 data store. Any processing capabilities to operate on the stored data need adding. Data is stored using erasure coding and failed nanoserver disks have data rebuilt using other nanoservers.

We also think 32-bit ARM CPUs look a bit light in compute power terms and 64-bit ones will need to be used if any serious compute is going to be done on the data.

Access is via Amazon's S3 API across a customer's 10Gbit Ethernet infrastructure. Other public cloud service access protocols will probably be added in the future.


The dataBox and dataRouter systems

A dataBox has 60 drives (nano-servers with 6TB disks) in a 4U enclosure and is a capacity store. A dataRouter is a stateless 1U server used for protocol endpoints and keeping track of data in the nanoserver mesh.

Customers start with a 2x1 system of two dataRouters and one dataBox at a usable capacity of 212TB. The dataRouters and dataBoxes can scale independently.


Igneous cloud management dashboard

There is some existing third-party software support. For example, Commvault Virtual Server Protection (VSP) enables users to back up to an Igneous System and Infinite IO works with Igneous.

This Igneous nanoserver kit is an interesting start in what we might ultimately call micro or nano hyper-converged systems. Getting involved with it means leading/bleeding edge work for Linux and S3 buffs.

Get a datasheet here. The Igneous Data Service is available immediately to customers in North America. Customers can purchase annual subscriptions in increments of 212TB of usable capacity, starting at under $40,000 (equivalent to 1.5 cents/GB/month). This is claimed to be lower than the cost of S3 (3 cents/GB/month). Volume discounts are available, based on installed capacity or contract duration. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • Restructure at Arm focused on 'non-engineering' roles
    Meanwhile, CEO wants to vacuum up engineering talent amid return to stock market

    Updated Arm today told The Reg its restructuring ahead of its return to the stock market is focused on cutting "non-engineering" jobs.

    This is after we queried comments made this morning by Arm chief executive Rene Haas in the Financial Times, in which he indicated he was looking to use funds generated by the expected public listing to expand the company, hire more staff, and potentially pursue acquisitions. This comes as some staff face the chop.

    This afternoon we were told by an Arm spokesperson: "Rene was referring more to the fact that Arm continues to invest significantly in its engineering talent, which makes up around 75 percent of the global headcount. For example, we currently have more than 250 engineering roles available globally."

    Continue reading
  • Arm says its Cortex-X3 CPU smokes this Intel laptop silicon
    Chip design house reveals brains of what might be your next ultralight notebook

    Arm has at least one of Intel's more capable mainstream laptop processors in mind with its Cortex-X3 CPU design.

    The British outfit said the X3, revealed Tuesday alongside other CPU and GPU blueprints, is expected to provide an estimated 34 percent higher peak performance than a performance core in Intel's upper mid-range Core i7-1260P processor from this year.

    Arm came to that conclusion, mind you, after running the SPECRate2017_int_base single-threaded benchmark in a simulation of its CPU core design clocked at an equivalent to 3.6GHz with 1MB of L2 and 16MB of L3 cache.

    Continue reading
  • Intel is running rings around AMD and Arm at the edge
    What will it take to loosen the x86 giant's edge stranglehold?

    Analysis Supermicro launched a wave of edge appliances using Intel's newly refreshed Xeon-D processors last week. The launch itself was nothing to write home about, but a thought occurred: with all the hype surrounding the outer reaches of computing that we call the edge, you'd think there would be more competition from chipmakers in this arena.

    So where are all the AMD and Arm-based edge appliances?

    A glance through the catalogs of the major OEMs – Dell, HPE, Lenovo, Inspur, Supermicro – returned plenty of results for AMD servers, but few, if any, validated for edge deployments. In fact, Supermicro was the only one of the five vendors that even offered an AMD-based edge appliance – which used an ageing Epyc processor. Hardly a great showing from AMD. Meanwhile, just one appliance from Inspur used an Arm-based chip from Nvidia.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022