Third of Donald Trump's debate deplorables are mindless automatons

Twitter bots make a lot of noise but thankfully can't vote in elections


Hillary Clinton may have the most human supporters among those running for the US presidency, but Donald Trump has an edge among automatons.

Pro-Trump Twitter hashtags from September 26 – the date of the first US presidential debate – through September 29 outnumbered pro-Clinton hashtags by about two-to-one, according to a study conducted by researchers from Corvinus University of Budapest, Oxford University, and the University of Washington.

About a third of the pro-Trump traffic originated from bots and automated accounts, compared to about a fifth of pro-Clinton traffic.

The paper, "Bots and Automation over Twitter during the First U.S. Presidential Debate," by Bence Kollanyi, Philip N Howard, and Samuel C Woolley, was released through Political Bots, a project that aims to assess the effect of automated advocacy on public life.

The researchers say it's not clear whether bots have enough effect on public opinion to warrant oversight, but they contend such software has become a potent way to create the appearance of grassroots support.

A bot is software designed to automate a task. Such programs or scripts have long been used to interact with websites, sniping items on eBay, sending spam, or participating in distributed denial of service attacks.

But with the mainstream adoption of social media, the proliferation of social media APIs, and the growing number of frameworks for understanding audio, text, and images, it has become trivial to create an army of chatbots to convey a particular message and to interact with people in a way that may pass for interpersonal conversation.

Microsoft and Facebook have been promoting bot frameworks for marketing and entertainment. But bots turn out to be ideal for parroting political messages – they're always on-message and they're undeterred by inconvenient facts.

"Political actors and governments worldwide have begun using bots to manipulate public opinion, choke off debate, and muddy political issues," the paper explains.

In a phone interview with The Register, Samuel C Woolley, director of research for Political Bots, a fellow at the UW Tech Policy Lab, and a PhD student in the department of communication at the University of Washington, said automation in public discourse can be helpful for disseminating information and providing social scaffolding.

"But in this case, I think the difference is there's a lack of transparency," said Woolley. The bots, he said, "are mimicking citizens or voters. There's a subtle manipulation of public opinion here."

Woolley contends that many people don't realize that they may be interacting with bots. "When people find out ... they're really shocked this is going on," he said. "It seems to be a turnoff for people."

The risk for Twitter and other social media companies is that bots come to dominate online discourse and drive people away. Online harassment, driven by people as well as bots, has already affected Twitter participation among journalists and activists in Mexico and Turkey, said Woolley.

Woolley argues that the media needs to understand how bots can sway online data like polls and needs to be skeptical of Twitter data. "Twitter metrics are massively manipulated by bots," he said.

Observing that some bots can be funny or entertaining, Woolley said he doesn't want to see bots banned completely. "The burden is now on the platforms [to police bots], because the legislation isn't there," he said, noting that internet companies may have legal reasons for not wanting to police content.

But in a medium where participation generally translates into ad revenue, bots may continue to get a long leash. As Woolley put it, "Bots drive up metrics." ®

Narrower topics


Other stories you might like

  • Microsoft's do-it-all IDE Visual Studio 2022 came out late last year. How good is it really?

    Top request from devs? A Linux version

    Review Visual Studio goes back a long way. Microsoft always had its own programming languages and tools, beginning with Microsoft Basic in 1975 and Microsoft C 1.0 in 1983.

    The Visual Studio idea came from two main sources. In the early days, Windows applications were coded and compiled using MS-DOS, and there was a MS-DOS IDE called Programmer's Workbench (PWB, first released 1989). The company also came up Visual Basic (VB, first released 1991), which unlike Microsoft C++ had a Windows IDE. Perhaps inspired by VB, Microsoft delivered Visual C++ 1.0 in 1993, replacing the little-used PWB. Visual Studio itself was introduced in 1997, though it was more of a bundle of different Windows development tools initially. The first Visual Studio to integrate C++ and Visual Basic (in .NET guise) development into the same IDE was Visual Studio .NET in 2002, 20 years ago, and this perhaps is the true ancestor of today's IDE.

    A big change in VS 2022, released November, is that it is the first version where the IDE itself runs as a 64-bit process. The advantage is that it has access to more than 4GB memory in the devenv process, this being the shell of the IDE, though of course it is still possible to compile 32-bit applications. The main benefit is for large solutions comprising hundreds of projects. Although a substantial change, it is transparent to developers and from what we can tell, has been a beneficial change.

    Continue reading
  • James Webb Space Telescope has arrived at its new home – an orbit almost a million miles from Earth

    Funnily enough, that's where we want to be right now, too

    The James Webb Space Telescope, the largest and most complex space observatory built by NASA, has reached its final destination: L2, the second Sun-Earth Lagrange point, an orbit located about a million miles away.

    Mission control sent instructions to fire the telescope's thrusters at 1400 EST (1900 UTC) on Monday. The small boost increased its speed by about 3.6 miles per hour to send it to L2, where it will orbit the Sun in line with Earth for the foreseeable future. It takes about 180 days to complete an L2 orbit, Amber Straughn, deputy project scientist for Webb Science Communications at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, said during a live briefing.

    "Webb, welcome home!" blurted NASA's Administrator Bill Nelson. "Congratulations to the team for all of their hard work ensuring Webb's safe arrival at L2 today. We're one step closer to uncovering the mysteries of the universe. And I can't wait to see Webb's first new views of the universe this summer."

    Continue reading
  • LG promises to make home appliance software upgradeable to take on new tasks

    Kids: empty the dishwasher! We can’t, Dad, it’s updating its OS to handle baked on grime from winter curries

    As the right to repair movement gathers pace, Korea’s LG has decided to make sure that its whitegoods can be upgraded.

    The company today announced a scheme called “Evolving Appliances For You.”

    The plan is sketchy: LG has outlined a scenario in which a customer who moves to a locale with climate markedly different to their previous home could use LG’s ThingQ app to upgrade their clothes dryer with new software that makes the appliance better suited to prevailing conditions and to the kind of fabrics you’d wear in a hotter or colder climes. The drier could also get new hardware to handle its new location. An image distributed by LG shows off the ability to change the tune a dryer plays after it finishes a load.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022