HMRC to create new compliance team focused on 'gig economy' workers

UK.gov raises eyebrow at firms hiring 'self-employed' staffers


A new compliance team which will address the "risks" associated with the changing nature of employment is to be established within HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

Financial secretary to the Treasury Jane Ellison confirmed the measure in a letter to Frank Field, the Labour MP who chairs the House of Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee. Field had written to HMRC requesting an investigation into employment practices at Hermes, the delivery company, following reports of "chronically low pay and poor working conditions at the company", according to a post on the MP's website.

In her letter to Field, Ellison said that the government was "committed to taking strong action where companies, to reduce their costs, force their staff down routes which deny them the employment rights and benefits they are entitled to".

"Employment status in the UK is determined by the reality of the working relationship and not simply by the terms of any contract," she said. "Individuals cannot be opted out of employment rights and protections simply by an engager calling them 'self employed'."

"Where companies are believed to have misclassified individuals as self-employed, HMRC establishes the facts of the case and will take steps to ensure that all the appropriate tax, [National Insurance contributions], interest and penalties are paid. These include, where necessary, taking individuals and companies to court to force payment," she said.

The new HMRC team will be called the 'Employment Status and Intermediaries Team', and will have as its focus "status and employment intermediary risks", according to Ellison. Having a dedicated team will enable the department "to better focus [its] resources and expertise to ensure these issues are effectively tackled", she said.

Self-employment is not currently defined by UK law. Different employment status tests are used for the purposes of tax, employment law and pensions auto-enrolment.

Earlier this month, the prime minister appointed Matthew Taylor of the RSA think tank to lead an independent review into modern employment practices. Taylor has been asked to consider the effectiveness of the regulatory framework surrounding employment in relation to new, more flexible ways of working; and whether the growth of the "gig economy" and other non-traditional forms of employment undermine policies such as the National Living Wage, automatic enrolment, parental leave, sickness and holiday pay.

Tax expert Heather Self of Pinsent Masons, the law firm behind Out-Law.com, said that although the question of whether an individual is employed or self-employed is not new, "it is clear that HMRC will be challenging the position more frequently".

"This is relevant not only to low-paid individuals in the so-called 'gig economy', but also to those who work in other areas such as IT consultants or media professionals," she said.

"The government announced in March that it would be changing the rules for 'off payroll' workers in the public sector, and it is looking increasingly likely that this will be extended more widely. This could impose significant extra compliance burdens on those companies that regularly engage consultants, where the question of whether someone is truly self-employed is not always easy to answer," she said.

From April 2017, public sector employers will become responsible for ensuring that any 'off-payroll' workers including those engaged through personal services companies (PSCs) pay the correct tax. Recruiters will be under the same obligation where the individual is engaged through an agency. Non-compliance with the rules requiring off-payroll workers in disguised remuneration to pay tax as employees, known as IR35, is currently costing the taxpayer around £440m a year, according to the 2016 Budget report.

Copyright © 2016, Out-Law.com

Out-Law.com is part of international law firm Pinsent Masons.

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • India reveals home-grown server that won't worry the leading edge

    And a National Blockchain Strategy that calls for gov to host BaaS

    India's government has revealed a home-grown server design that is unlikely to threaten the pacesetters of high tech, but (it hopes) will attract domestic buyers and manufacturers and help to kickstart the nation's hardware industry.

    The "Rudra" design is a two-socket server that can run Intel's Cascade Lake Xeons. The machines are offered in 1U or 2U form factors, each at half-width. A pair of GPUs can be equipped, as can DDR4 RAM.

    Cascade Lake emerged in 2019 and has since been superseded by the Ice Lake architecture launched in April 2021. Indian authorities know Rudra is off the pace, and said a new design capable of supporting four GPUs is already in the works with a reveal planned for June 2022.

    Continue reading
  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021