Uncle Sam emits DNS email security guide – now speak your brains

NIST wants to nip message hacks in the bud. We're betting President Clinton agrees

The US National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) has published a guide on how to improve email security – and it wants your feedback on it.

The center is part of NIST – America's National Institute of Standards and Technology – which itself part of the US Department of Commerce. The NCCoE has put out its "draft practice guide" in an effort to educate and inform people about how to introduce proper email security.

The hope of the 241-page publication [PDF] is to increase defenses as broadly as possible against phishing, man-in-the-middle, malware and various other types of email-based attacks. Given the recent high-profile hack of the Democratic National Committee's email system and Hillary Clinton campaign manager John Podesta, the guide can't come soon enough for some.

The NCCoE points out that email attacks have increased in recent years, in part because of the ever-growing importance of email and in part because people fail to protect email in the same way they do other important methods of communication.

"Organizations need to protect their server-based email security mechanisms against intrusion and man-in-the-middle attacks during the automated cryptographic service negotiation process," the organization argues.

"In the absence of appropriate combination protections, any of these attacks can result in reading or modification of information by unauthorized third parties."

The guide walks through commercially available technologies that can greatly increase email security. It also takes a pragmatic approach: most people – even sysadmins – are not able to put serious protections in place, particularly when it comes to verifying the legitimacy of an incoming email, since such approaches are complex and time-consuming.

At the same time, server-based security systems are open to attack, especially if using outdated technology – giving people a false sense of security. The draft guide is designed to go through the best currently available technology and assist people in introducing it.

The guide includes encryption tools at the exchange level, as well as individual encryption and signing tools. It hopes to be user-friendly, although it's aimed at infosec pros rather than your average consumer.

It lists four main end-goals for companies:

  • Encrypt email traffic between servers.
  • Allow individual email users to digitally sign and/or encrypt email messages to other end users.
  • Allow individual email users to obtain other users' certificates in order to validate signed email or send encrypted email.
  • Generate information that can be queried by email recipients to identify valid email senders for a domain, and that a given message originated from one of the valid senders.

The guide is "initially focused" on SMTP over TLS and S/MIME and it is a fan of DANE and DNSSEC.

The NCCoE suspects – as do we – that sysadmins are going to have some views on this, and so it has put NIST Special Publication 1800-6 out for public comment until December 19. You can find out more online. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021