Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Canada confiscates snoops' data nets after illegal trawling dragged up too much metadata

Canadian Security Intelligence Service mangled mandate to feed its big data appetite

Canada's Federal Court has rapped the Canadian Security Intelligence Service's (CSIS) knuckles for retaining too much citizen metadata.

Its judgement (in a secret case, with relevant names redacted) was handed down in October and published last Thursday.

Justice Simon Noel was more than peeved that the CSIS gathered data under warrants, but didn't inform the court of the data collection program – and did so for as long as 10 years.

The judgement outlines that the CSIS interpreted its mandate as giving it the right to suck everything it collected into its “Operational Data Analysis Center” (ODAC). When it created the ODAC (in April 2006), it told its minister, then Conservative MP Stockwell Day – but it failed to tell the courts.

Essentially, the spooks used warrants to collect legitimate information – and to go on fishing expeditions, gathering “associated data” the court didn't know about.

The judgement says the CSIS “had an obligation, beginning in 2006, to fully inform the Court of the existence of its collection and retention of associated data program”.

It did not do so until 2016, even though it frequently appeared in in-camera hearings on an ex parte basis.

Its status in court meant “the CSIS had an elevated obligation to inform the Court of the use it was making of non-threat-related information collected through the operation of warrants”, but “it failed to do so.”

The judgement also criticises the CSIS for collecting and retaining “associated data” that had no relevance to security investigations.

“I conclude that the retention of associated data falls outside the CSIS’s legislatively defined jurisdiction and does not respect the CSIS’s limited primary mandate and functions,” the judgement states.

Justice Noel adds that “the rule of law must prevail”, and that limits imposed by legislation “must be respected”.

CBC carries an apology by CSIS director Michel Coulombe, along with an assertion that the data collection was mostly legal.

Coulombe said: “All associated data collected under warrants was done legally. The court's key concerns relates to our retention of non-threat-related associated data linked with third-party communication after it was collected.”

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like