Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Australia again ponders making attorney-general netadmin-in-chief

Ministerial oversight of telecoms networks and the kit they buy is back on the agenda

Australia's attempt to make its attorney-general Netadmin-in-chief is back on the legislative agenda.

An exposure draft for the proposed law, available here, would give the A-G sweeping powers over the operation of telecommunications networks.

The provisions in the year-old exposure draft include the Attorney General's Department getting a veto over “significant” changes to carrier networks without prior notice (which would make software-defined networking [SDN] difficult to implement), and a ministerial veto over which vendors are allowed to build carrier networks.

Earlier this year, The Register reported strong industry opposition to the laws.

As well as making network admin harder, the carriers are worried that excluding vendors from bids will cut competition and make network kit more expensive.

Huawei has long been blocked from supplying kit to Australia's National Broadband Network, even though the NBN's principal supplier, Nokia (the former Alcatel-Lucent) builds kit in a Chinese joint venture (the Sydney Morning Herald suffered the vapours about the discovery earlier this week, even though it was told about the joint venture's Chinese “links” in 2012).

According to Crikey political correspondent Josh Taylor, the Coalition party room yesterday agreed that the laws will be brought back to parliament, so telcos are presumably briefing their lobbists.

®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like