Tech Trump: Silicon Valley steps into the valley of unhappiness

It's a long litany of problematic positions

The biggest question facing millions of Americans this Wednesday is: just how much of what Donald Trump said on the campaign does he intend to actually try to make happen.

And in that respect, few are more fearful than Silicon Valley.

As we've already noted, Trump has backed a number of positions that go directly against the Valley's interests: from a clampdown on H-1B visas, to proposing tariffs on goods manufactured outside the US, to opposing trade deals.

But concerns go far deeper than that. Trump directly and repeatedly attacked both Apple and Amazon. With Apple, he proposed a boycott of Apple products until the iPhone maker agreed to allow a backdoor into its handsets so the FBI could retrieve information, and he singled out the California giant for his proposed trade tariffs, railing against the company's huge manufacturing bases in China.

As for Amazon, Trump focused in on CEO Jeff Bezos, seemingly slighted by critical Washington Post coverage of him (Bezos bought the Post in 2013), and argued that Bezos has a "huge antitrust problem because he's controlling so much, Amazon is controlling so much of what they are doing."


Trump has repeatedly demonstrated his willingness to go after people and companies that he feels have wronged him, and publicly stated a number of times – including in his victory speech – that he will target those he have been critics of his bid.

On Bezos and the Post, Trump said: "He's using the Washington Post, which is peanuts, he's using that for political purposes to save Amazon in terms of taxes and in terms of antitrust."

And while Trump has found fame as a successful businessman, he has never touched the tech industry or startup culture, instead working in the traditional field of real estate, as well as a huge branding effort of his own name across industries.

As such, Silicon Valley feels that Trump has little or no insight in their business approach. On top of which Trump has held a long persistent belief in a mercantilist economy when nation states protect their own companies from outside forces. That isolationist approach is anathema to tech giants who very success is built on global trade and availability.

Perhaps highlighting the feelings of many in the Valley, one notable outburst came on stage at the WebSummit taking place today in Lisbon, Portugal. On the main stage, entrepreneur and angel investor Dave McClure had a full meltdown over the election results.

"If you’re not fucking pissed right now, what is wrong with you?" he yelled at attendees - most of whom don't live in the US. "I'm pissed off, I'm sad, I'm ashamed, I'm angry," he ranted.

There may be an upside however: Trump has proposed allowing US companies to repatriate the billions of dollars they have stashed overseas by paying just 10 per cent in tax. That would bring a lot of money into the country and undoubtably see big tech share prices jump as a result. Longer term, however, Silicon Valley has much to be wary off from a President Trump. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • The future: Windows streaming through notched Apple screens

    Choice is the word for Jamf's Dean Hager

    Interview As Apple's devices continue to find favour with enterprise users, the fortress that is Windows appears to be under attack in the corporate world.

    Speaking to The Register as the Jamf Nation User Conference wound down, the software firm's CEO, Dean Hager, is - unsurprisingly - ebullient when it comes to the prospects for Apple gear in the world of suits.

    Jamf specialises in device management and authentication, and has long been associated with managing Apple hardware in business and education environments. In recent years it has begun connecting its products with services such as Microsoft's Azure Active Directory as administrators face up to a hybrid working future.

    Continue reading
  • There’s a wave of ransomware coming down the pipeline. What can you do about it?

    AI can help. Here’s how…

    Sponsored The Colonial Pipeline attack earlier this year showed just how devastating a ransomware attack is when it is targeted at critical infrastructure.

    It also illustrated how traditional security techniques are increasingly struggling to keep pace with determined cyber attackers, whether their aim is exfiltrating data, extorting organisations, or simply causing chaos. Or, indeed an unpleasant combination of all three.

    So, what are your options? More people looking for more flaws isn’t going to be enough – there simply aren’t enough skilled people, there are too many bugs, and there are way too many attackers. So, it’s clear that smart cyber defenders need to be supplemented by even smarter technology incorporating AI. You can learn what this looks like by checking out this upcoming Regcast, “Securing Critical Infrastructure from Cyber-attack” on October 28 at 5pm.

    Continue reading
  • Ransomware criminals have feelings too: BlackMatter abuse caused crims to shut down negotiation portal

    Or so says infsec outfit Emsisoft

    Hurling online abuse at ransomware gangs may have contributed to a hardline policy of dumping victims' data online, according to counter-ransomware company Emsisoft.

    Earlier this month, the Conti ransomware gang declared it would publish victims' data and break off ransom negotiations if anyone other than "respected journalist and researcher personalities" [sic] dared publish snippets of ransomware negotiations, amid a general hardening of attitudes among ransomware gangs.

    Typically these conversation snippets make it into the public domain because curious people log into ransomware negotiation portals hosted by the criminals. The BlackMatter (aka DarkSide) gang's portal credentials (detailed in a ransom note) became exposed to the wider world, however, and the resulting wave of furious abuse hurled at the crims prompted them to pull up the virtual drawbridge.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021