The sharks of AI will attack expensive and scarce workers faster than they eat drivers

Your career is now a game of musical chairs: you need to be ready when the song stops

Although sixty years old, artificial intelligence remained mostly a curiosity until half a decade ago, when IBM’s Watson trounced the world’s best Jeopardy! players in a televised match. At the time, you might have thought nothing of that - what does a game show matter in the scheme of things?

It didn’t stop there. IBM sent Watson to train with oncologists and lawyers and financial advisers. Quite suddenly, three very established professions, just the sort of thing you'd tell your kids to pursue as a ticket to prosperity, seemed a lot less certain of their futures in a world where intelligence, like computing before it, becomes pervasive, then commoditised.

These top-of-their-profession projects show that the driver to bring artificial intelligence into any field isn’t the amount of labor, but rather the cost of that labor. A lawyer costs fifty times more per hour than a retail worker and so is that many times more likely to find themselves with an AI competitor.

Automation's erosion of work will proceed from the top-down; although we will certainly see long-haul truck drivers replaced by autonomous vehicles within the next few years, it’s actually the doctors and lawyers and bankers who really need to be afraid.

Just today I read an article about MogIA, software that analyzes millions of inputs from social media and search engines to predict the future. Since MogIA called the result of the recent US Presidential election, it’s being taken quite seriously. It’s reasonable to expect that within a few years I could be competing against an always-on Futurist-as-a-service in my own professional life.

The same will be true for editors and marketers and auditors and … at this point we run out of pavement, because while there are likely to be some professional roles that artificial intelligence will not compete with in the short term, those roles are fewer than we had believed, and we can’t all crowd into those fields.

The middle years of the 21st century will feel a bit like musical chairs to anyone who tries to build a career. Everyone so often the music will stop, and another profession will have been eaten by increasingly-capable AIs.

When that problem was ‘over there’ - with people who had less training, whose lives were more precarious - we gave it less thought than we probably should have. Now we have to wonder if we have enough time to think our way through to a solution.

Our ‘gig economy’ demonstrates both problem and solution: we have no security, but we do have flexibility. Sharks, tracing an endless path toward our next meal, we have to keep moving. But the fish are getting wise to our ways, so we can’t be the same dumb eating machines we were a decade, or even a year ago. We have to get smarter faster than our dinner, or we’ll never find enough to eat.

Education needs to become a constant part of our diet: real education, not not just the firehose of truthy factoids that clutter social media. For a generation, educators have been pointing to an era of ‘lifelong learning’, a cradle-to-grave process of capacity-building. For all that talk, we haven’t seen enough of it; those of us who we graduate from university mostly get to work and seldom make the time for or are offered further professional development.

The massive infrastructure we’ve built out over the last decade - one that brought three billion smartphones to as many hands - offers us a chance to lean into lifelong learning. Case in point: earlier this year I watched a video of a 15 year old, teaching me how to program in virtual reality. For almost any topic in technology, you can use a search engine to find an answer.

That’s not to say Google is the new classroom - because we’ve already outgrown the classroom. We have to reorder our priorities, using our “20% time" to master a new and valuable skill, and we have to do this constantly. There’s no end to this treadmill, because at no point will any of this artificial intelligence stop to take a breath.

We value IT automation as a time- and money-saver, allowing us to do ever more with less. That drive to automation doesn’t stop just because it engulfs our own skills. Our efforts in machine learning, cloud computing, and connectivity have enabled this revolution, and it’s coming for us now, this Rise of the Machines.

The same skills that enabled that rise can help us rise to meet the challenge. We know how to build systems that allow us to share knowledge at scale, learn from one another, and put those new capacities to work. In smartphones we have a global platform to bring these systems to nearly every adult on the planet - just in the nick of time.

This is the future IT owes to everyone else; we took the jobs away, now we have to create the scaffolding to allow everyone keep pace in a world where robots are nipping at our heels. Unless we learn how to learn a lot faster than we do today, we’ll be eaten whole. ®

Other stories you might like

  • DuckDuckGo tries to explain why its browsers won't block some Microsoft web trackers
    Meanwhile, Tails 5.0 users told to stop what they're doing over Firefox flaw

    DuckDuckGo promises privacy to users of its Android, iOS browsers, and macOS browsers – yet it allows certain data to flow from third-party websites to Microsoft-owned services.

    Security researcher Zach Edwards recently conducted an audit of DuckDuckGo's mobile browsers and found that, contrary to expectations, they do not block Meta's Workplace domain, for example, from sending information to Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains.

    Specifically, DuckDuckGo's software didn't stop Microsoft's trackers on the Workplace page from blabbing information about the user to Bing and LinkedIn for tailored advertising purposes. Other trackers, such as Google's, are blocked.

    Continue reading
  • Despite 'key' partnership with AWS, Meta taps up Microsoft Azure for AI work
    Someone got Zuck'd

    Meta’s AI business unit set up shop in Microsoft Azure this week and announced a strategic partnership it says will advance PyTorch development on the public cloud.

    The deal [PDF] will see Mark Zuckerberg’s umbrella company deploy machine-learning workloads on thousands of Nvidia GPUs running in Azure. While a win for Microsoft, the partnership calls in to question just how strong Meta’s commitment to Amazon Web Services (AWS) really is.

    Back in those long-gone days of December, Meta named AWS as its “key long-term strategic cloud provider." As part of that, Meta promised that if it bought any companies that used AWS, it would continue to support their use of Amazon's cloud, rather than force them off into its own private datacenters. The pact also included a vow to expand Meta’s consumption of Amazon’s cloud-based compute, storage, database, and security services.

    Continue reading
  • Atos pushes out HPC cloud services based on Nimbix tech
    Moore's Law got you down? Throw everything at the problem! Quantum, AI, cloud...

    IT services biz Atos has introduced a suite of cloud-based high-performance computing (HPC) services, based around technology gained from its purchase of cloud provider Nimbix last year.

    The Nimbix Supercomputing Suite is described by Atos as a set of flexible and secure HPC solutions available as a service. It includes access to HPC, AI, and quantum computing resources, according to the services company.

    In addition to the existing Nimbix HPC products, the updated portfolio includes a new federated supercomputing-as-a-service platform and a dedicated bare-metal service based on Atos BullSequana supercomputer hardware.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022