BlackBerry's final QWERTY floats past the rumour mill

What took you so long?

Hindsight is a wonderful thing, but what if BlackBerry had produced a smart, secure Android QWERTY in 2011, rather than waiting until 2017? A photo purporting to be BlackBerry’s final phone – which happens to be a smart, secure Android QWERTY expected in Q1 next year, popped up at the weekend, inviting counterfactual histories.

A BlackBerry patent application for a QWERTY touch keyboard that unlocks the device emerged in October.

The phone, codenamed "Mercury", appears to be an Android with a 3:2 aspect ratio display, and a 4-row capacitive keyboard. The Mercury is also expected to incorporate a fingerprint scanner into the space key – a trick BlackBerry has filed for patent protection.

BlackBerry has said the device will be the final phone that it has a hand in designing, as the company transitions to a smartphone licensing business. Future BlackBerry-branded devices will be made by third parties, with the company continuing to develop its “hardened” Android and software suite for OEMs.

After so many mis-steps and diversions, long-suffering fans may be wondering why it took BlackBerry so long to produce a mainstream QWERTY. BlackBerry launched its own platform four years ago, giving itself a gargantuan task to break the iPhone/Android duopoly. It then devoted itself to its BB10 platform for three years before offering its first Android phone a year ago. BlackBerry’s first three Android phones were two full-touch models and a very expensive slider, the Priv.

The latter was dogged by thermal and performance issues, so the much more efficient Snapdragon 625 that’s expected to power the Mercury looks a smart choice. The octocore chip is built on a 14nm process, and is much more frugal than its predecessor, the Snapdragon 617 which powers BlackBerry’s DTEK50. Motorola’s Moto Z Play uses the same Qualcomm part, and allied to a 3510 mAh battery, offers around two days of use. (Moto claims 50 hours of "mixed use".)

It’s tempting to imagine what might have been, if BlackBerry had adopted the Android platform earlier. Perhaps it may have been able to carve out a niche by migrating its still-substantial BBOS6/7 user base to a modern platform. Android’s astronomical growth in 2010 and 2011 had left BlackBerry with low value customers in emerging markets and prepay by the time it launched BB10 in January 2013, and with BB10 still incomplete, and guzzling more memory than planned, BlackBerry was unable to make the low cost phones it needed to retain those customers.

In reality, few industry insiders anticipated Android’s runaway success in 2010. The Java platform was still immature, and it would be years before it could boast enterprise features like remote wipe. An engineering-led company like BlackBerry was naturally keen to develop its own technology, rather than attempt to modify an off-the-shelf Java platform from Google. ®

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • North Korea pulled in $400m in cryptocurrency heists last year – report

    Plus: FIFA 22 players lose their identity and Texas gets phony QR codes

    In brief Thieves operating for the North Korean government made off with almost $400m in digicash last year in a concerted attack to steal and launder as much currency as they could.

    A report from blockchain biz Chainalysis found that attackers were going after investment houses and currency exchanges in a bid to purloin funds and send them back to the Glorious Leader's coffers. They then use mixing software to make masses of micropayments to new wallets, before consolidating them all again into a new account and moving the funds.

    Bitcoin used to be a top target but Ether is now the most stolen currency, say the researchers, accounting for 58 per cent of the funds filched. Bitcoin accounted for just 20 per cent, a fall of more than 50 per cent since 2019 - although part of the reason might be that they are now so valuable people are taking more care with them.

    Continue reading
  • Tesla Full Self-Driving videos prompt California's DMV to rethink policy on accidents

    Plus: AI systems can identify different chess players by their moves and more

    In brief California’s Department of Motor Vehicles said it’s “revisiting” its opinion of whether Tesla’s so-called Full Self-Driving feature needs more oversight after a series of videos demonstrate how the technology can be dangerous.

    “Recent software updates, videos showing dangerous use of that technology, open investigations by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, and the opinions of other experts in this space,” have made the DMV think twice about Tesla, according to a letter sent to California’s Senator Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), chair of the Senate’s transportation committee, and first reported by the LA Times.

    Tesla isn’t required to report the number of crashes to California’s DMV unlike other self-driving car companies like Waymo or Cruise because it operates at lower levels of autonomy and requires human supervision. But that may change after videos like drivers having to take over to avoid accidentally swerving into pedestrians crossing the road or failing to detect a truck in the middle of the road continue circulating.

    Continue reading
  • Alien life on Super-Earth can survive longer than us due to long-lasting protection from cosmic rays

    Laser experiments show their magnetic fields shielding their surfaces from radiation last longer

    Life on Super-Earths may have more time to develop and evolve, thanks to their long-lasting magnetic fields protecting them against harmful cosmic rays, according to new research published in Science.

    Space is a hazardous environment. Streams of charged particles traveling at very close to the speed of light, ejected from stars and distant galaxies, bombard planets. The intense radiation can strip atmospheres and cause oceans on planetary surfaces to dry up over time, leaving them arid and incapable of supporting habitable life. Cosmic rays, however, are deflected away from Earth, however, since it’s shielded by its magnetic field.

    Now, a team of researchers led by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (LLNL) believe that Super-Earths - planets that are more massive than Earth but less than Neptune - may have magnetic fields too. Their defensive bubbles, in fact, are estimated to stay intact for longer than the one around Earth, meaning life on their surfaces will have more time to develop and survive.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022