For God's sake, stop trying to make Microsoft Bob a thing. It's over

New Evo techno-goggles emerge for 3D virtual reality desktops

Vid Microsoft has entered the virtual reality race, announcing a new headset called Evo in collaboration with Intel.

The headset will have the same advanced features of current high-end products including the Oculus Rift, HTC Vive and soon-to-be-launched Sulon Q, but will work with mid-range laptops, the company said.

Up to now, Microsoft has focused its VR efforts on augmented reality (AR) and its Hololens glasses that add digital elements on a screen that you look through to the real world. The Evo will go full VR, covering your eyes and then reflecting an augmented reality back to you.

Critically, the Evo will allow for "inside-out" spacial awareness, meaning that sensors will be built into the headset to allow you to walk around a physical space with the headset, rather than requiring that external sensors be set up within your room to define a space.

That inside-out technology is what Sulon Q hopes to help it get first maneuver advantage on the market when it launches early next year, while both the Rift and Vive are furiously working on their own versions.

Promotional videos for Microsoft's new Evo also show the headset as being wireless – again, something that Sulon Q is pushing as a unique advantage to its system (it has a full Windows 10 computer built into the headset), and something that both Oculus and Vive are working on.

At the moment, high-end headsets have to be physically connected by a wire to a high-spec computer. The Evo, on the other hand, will be wirelessly paired with a computer to achieve, well, this:

Youtube Video

Hm, what does this remind us of? Oh yes, that's right. Microsoft Bob. Which Redmond tried to make a success in 1995. And failed. It even has the little dog in the corner, too. Maybe 2017 will be kinder.

Youtube Video

Back to 2016: if Microsoft announced a new VR headset that wasn't wireless and didn't have inside-out tracking, it would have been laughed out of the room. The big question is when will it launch?

And on that Microsoft is being wildly vague. It says its Hololens should be available "in the first half of 2017," and it says it has already shared the specs for PCs that will power its new headset, with those PCs available "next year." It says developer kits will be made available to developers at the Game Developers Conference in San Francisco in February.

And it announced that the hardware developer 3Glasses will "bring the Windows 10 experience to their S1 device in the first half of 2017" – but that's not the same as saying Microsoft Evo headsets will be available by then.

Incidentally, the minimum specs for the new headsets are:

  • Intel Mobile Core i5 dual-core
  • Intel HD Graphics 620 (GT2) or equivalent
  • 8GB RAM
  • HMDI 1.4 or 2
  • 100GB drive (preferably solid state)
  • Bluetooth 4.0

Taking all the announcements together, it looks as though Microsoft is aiming at a Q3 or Q4 2017 launch of its VR headset – a timeline that is likely to give Oculus, Vive and Sulon a few months' head start, but probably not enough of one to steal the market.

Where Microsoft and Intel really could win, however, is if they do manage to create a good VR system that requires a less powerful machine to run. That would pull down the price tag for the whole system and place it above the current best offering on the market – the PlayStation VR – in terms of quality. ®

Similar topics

Narrower topics

Other stories you might like

  • Stolen university credentials up for sale by Russian crooks, FBI warns
    Forget dark-web souks, thousands of these are already being traded on public bazaars

    Russian crooks are selling network credentials and virtual private network access for a "multitude" of US universities and colleges on criminal marketplaces, according to the FBI.

    According to a warning issued on Thursday, these stolen credentials sell for thousands of dollars on both dark web and public internet forums, and could lead to subsequent cyberattacks against individual employees or the schools themselves.

    "The exposure of usernames and passwords can lead to brute force credential stuffing computer network attacks, whereby attackers attempt logins across various internet sites or exploit them for subsequent cyber attacks as criminal actors take advantage of users recycling the same credentials across multiple accounts, internet sites, and services," the Feds' alert [PDF] said.

    Continue reading
  • Big Tech loves talking up privacy – while trying to kill privacy legislation
    Study claims Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, Microsoft work to derail data rules

    Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft often support privacy in public statements, but behind the scenes they've been working through some common organizations to weaken or kill privacy legislation in US states.

    That's according to a report this week from news non-profit The Markup, which said the corporations hire lobbyists from the same few groups and law firms to defang or drown state privacy bills.

    The report examined 31 states when state legislatures were considering privacy legislation and identified 445 lobbyists and lobbying firms working on behalf of Amazon, Apple, Google, Meta, and Microsoft, along with industry groups like TechNet and the State Privacy and Security Coalition.

    Continue reading
  • SEC probes Musk for not properly disclosing Twitter stake
    Meanwhile, social network's board rejects resignation of one its directors

    America's financial watchdog is investigating whether Elon Musk adequately disclosed his purchase of Twitter shares last month, just as his bid to take over the social media company hangs in the balance. 

    A letter [PDF] from the SEC addressed to the tech billionaire said he "[did] not appear" to have filed the proper form detailing his 9.2 percent stake in Twitter "required 10 days from the date of acquisition," and asked him to provide more information. Musk's shares made him one of Twitter's largest shareholders. The letter is dated April 4, and was shared this week by the regulator.

    Musk quickly moved to try and buy the whole company outright in a deal initially worth over $44 billion. Musk sold a chunk of his shares in Tesla worth $8.4 billion and bagged another $7.14 billion from investors to help finance the $21 billion he promised to put forward for the deal. The remaining $25.5 billion bill was secured via debt financing by Morgan Stanley, Bank of America, Barclays, and others. But the takeover is not going smoothly.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022