Who killed Pebble? Easy: The vulture capitalists

DIY hero made Faustian pact. Now his company is dead

Comment We just didn’t know it at the time, but Pebble’s fate was sealed in May 2013 when it surrendered control to outsiders who saddled it with debt.

Yesterday Pebble’s new owner Fitbit lost no time in closing down the operation, not merely snuffing out any prospect of new products, but warning Pebble owners that they’re not going to get any more love or updates.

Fairly soon, even the Pebble you have will stop working. What a way to treat your customers.

Notch another one up for the geniuses of Sand Hill Road. Without “help” from Silicon Valley VCs, Pebble could still be in the game: independent, and with a future. The founder certainly appeared to think so.

“We’re going to be wearing more computers on us: I think that’s inevitable,” Eric Migicovsky told The Guardian last year.

For four years Migicovsky’s startup has been a tech darling. The Pebble was popular with Reg readers and beyond: everyone loved to love the Pebble story. It was a terrific tale of overcoming rejection, rescue by the people, then a David against Goliath struggle.

Pebble revelled in this underdog status.

“Pebble is made by Real People for Real People,” the company boasted. It greeted Apple’s entry into the market by jeering: “Overpriced Trophy Watch.”

Pebble took a different path to the mobile giants who came to the watch market reluctantly and defensively. It had chosen to be useful rather than pretty and powerful.

Google and Apple were keen to shore up their phone duopoly than explore, and both chose to stuff hugely power hungry operating systems onto the wrist. By contrast, the battery charge in Pebble’s first watches lasted for more than a week. They were waterproof and durable. They did notifications well and everything else was… up to the community. The Pebble adventure felt like a community barn-raising exercise.

Kickstarter, too, also enjoyed a halo effect. After being snubbed by VCs, Pebble collected more than $10m in its funding drive in 2012.

“Android Wear uses the same processor that’s inside an Android phone. That strikes me as a little bit like having a smartwatch on your wrist. But I don’t believe there’s too much innovation happening when you make an app that runs on the phone itself,” Migicovsky told me two years ago, and he was proven right.

Today, Android Wear is on life support, and most of Apple’s Watch features go unused. (I am an ex-Pebbler; I use no third-party apps on an Apple Watch at all). Pebble was a hit: it had 18,000 developers and there were tons of accessories.

The zenith of Pebble’s ride was at Mobile World Congress in March 2015. Here, Migicovsky showed off its first colour models and a smart new UX for the range. Both seemed completely in keeping with the Pebble philosophy: the colour e-Ink display didn’t compromise battery life, and the UX was practical. And here, Pebble showed its big idea for the future, which would prevent Pebble from becoming bloated junk, like the Android competition.

Pebble created a two-pin port, an "expansion slot for straps", so new functionality could go into third party watch bands rather than the Pebble itself.

“A strap could contain specialist sensors for monitoring heart beat or blood pressure, environmental conditions, and GPS. Or if you’re a nuclear inspector, you could have a strap with a built in Geiger counter,” the founder told us.

Smartstraps looked like a great idea. One launched on Kickstarter to provide NFC payments. Another was just a giant battery.

So what went wrong?

Next page: The Fall of Pebble

Other stories you might like

  • Lonestar plans to put datacenters in the Moon's lava tubes
    How? Founder tells The Register 'Robots… lots of robots'

    Imagine a future where racks of computer servers hum quietly in darkness below the surface of the Moon.

    Here is where some of the most important data is stored, to be left untouched for as long as can be. The idea sounds like something from science-fiction, but one startup that recently emerged from stealth is trying to turn it into a reality. Lonestar Data Holdings has a unique mission unlike any other cloud provider: to build datacenters on the Moon backing up the world's data.

    "It's inconceivable to me that we are keeping our most precious assets, our knowledge and our data, on Earth, where we're setting off bombs and burning things," Christopher Stott, founder and CEO of Lonestar, told The Register. "We need to put our assets in place off our planet, where we can keep it safe."

    Continue reading
  • Conti: Russian-backed rulers of Costa Rican hacktocracy?
    Also, Chinese IT admin jailed for deleting database, and the NSA promises no more backdoors

    In brief The notorious Russian-aligned Conti ransomware gang has upped the ante in its attack against Costa Rica, threatening to overthrow the government if it doesn't pay a $20 million ransom. 

    Costa Rican president Rodrigo Chaves said that the country is effectively at war with the gang, who in April infiltrated the government's computer systems, gaining a foothold in 27 agencies at various government levels. The US State Department has offered a $15 million reward leading to the capture of Conti's leaders, who it said have made more than $150 million from 1,000+ victims.

    Conti claimed this week that it has insiders in the Costa Rican government, the AP reported, warning that "We are determined to overthrow the government by means of a cyber attack, we have already shown you all the strength and power, you have introduced an emergency." 

    Continue reading
  • China-linked Twisted Panda caught spying on Russian defense R&D
    Because Beijing isn't above covert ops to accomplish its five-year goals

    Chinese cyberspies targeted two Russian defense institutes and possibly another research facility in Belarus, according to Check Point Research.

    The new campaign, dubbed Twisted Panda, is part of a larger, state-sponsored espionage operation that has been ongoing for several months, if not nearly a year, according to the security shop.

    In a technical analysis, the researchers detail the various malicious stages and payloads of the campaign that used sanctions-related phishing emails to attack Russian entities, which are part of the state-owned defense conglomerate Rostec Corporation.

    Continue reading
  • FTC signals crackdown on ed-tech harvesting kid's data
    Trade watchdog, and President, reminds that COPPA can ban ya

    The US Federal Trade Commission on Thursday said it intends to take action against educational technology companies that unlawfully collect data from children using online educational services.

    In a policy statement, the agency said, "Children should not have to needlessly hand over their data and forfeit their privacy in order to do their schoolwork or participate in remote learning, especially given the wide and increasing adoption of ed tech tools."

    The agency says it will scrutinize educational service providers to ensure that they are meeting their legal obligations under COPPA, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.

    Continue reading
  • Mysterious firm seeks to buy majority stake in Arm China
    Chinese joint venture's ousted CEO tries to hang on - who will get control?

    The saga surrounding Arm's joint venture in China just took another intriguing turn: a mysterious firm named Lotcap Group claims it has signed a letter of intent to buy a 51 percent stake in Arm China from existing investors in the country.

    In a Chinese-language press release posted Wednesday, Lotcap said it has formed a subsidiary, Lotcap Fund, to buy a majority stake in the joint venture. However, reporting by one newspaper suggested that the investment firm still needs the approval of one significant investor to gain 51 percent control of Arm China.

    The development comes a couple of weeks after Arm China said that its former CEO, Allen Wu, was refusing once again to step down from his position, despite the company's board voting in late April to replace Wu with two co-chief executives. SoftBank Group, which owns 49 percent of the Chinese venture, has been trying to unentangle Arm China from Wu as the Japanese tech investment giant plans for an initial public offering of the British parent company.

    Continue reading
  • SmartNICs power the cloud, are enterprise datacenters next?
    High pricing, lack of software make smartNICs a tough sell, despite offload potential

    SmartNICs have the potential to accelerate enterprise workloads, but don't expect to see them bring hyperscale-class efficiency to most datacenters anytime soon, ZK Research's Zeus Kerravala told The Register.

    SmartNICs are widely deployed in cloud and hyperscale datacenters as a means to offload input/output (I/O) intensive network, security, and storage operations from the CPU, freeing it up to run revenue generating tenant workloads. Some more advanced chips even offload the hypervisor to further separate the infrastructure management layer from the rest of the server.

    Despite relative success in the cloud and a flurry of innovation from the still-limited vendor SmartNIC ecosystem, including Mellanox (Nvidia), Intel, Marvell, and Xilinx (AMD), Kerravala argues that the use cases for enterprise datacenters are unlikely to resemble those of the major hyperscalers, at least in the near term.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022