Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

Arista takes a round off Cisco in long-running legal battle

Jury finds similar CLI syntax and manuals don't create Copyright claims

Arista's taken a round from Cisco, as the two companies continue their long-running legal wrestle.

This time the jurisdiction was the Northern District of California and the matter under consideration was Arista's command line interface and whether it breached a Cisco patent, or Switchzilla's copyrights on syntax or a user manual.

A jury found Arista in the clear on all counts. Arista looks to have won thanks to the “scènes à faire doctrine”, a legal argument that says in some situations it's acceptable for a product to offer what's expected under the circumstances. The doctrine is often explained in the context of genre elements in cinema: you'd expect a noir-ish detective film to include certain trappings but would not expect using those conventions to create a copyright obligation. Previous cases have extended the doctrine to some aspects of software.

Just last week, Cisco appeared optimistic this case would go its way and further paint Arist as a serial IP appropriator.

Cisco's now taken to its blog to argue that the jury “misapplied, or misunderstood” the scènes à faire doctrine. The company also takes heart from the decision's point that Arista did copy Cisco.

Cisco general counsel Mark Chandler also asks the world to look at the scoreboard for IP battles between the two, which currently reads Cisco 2: Arista 1. In Cisco's view, Arista's point scarcely counts seeing as it was won on a technicality and despite being found to have copied Cisco's work. ®

 

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like