5G? Pff, don't bother, says one-time Ofcom man's new book

Sort out existing mobile networks first, argues Prof William Webb


Book review All the hype around 5G is hiding the simple fact that we don’t actually need a new mobile specification. That is the central thrust of Professor William Webb’s new book, The 5G Myth: And why consistent connectivity is a better future.

Prof Webb’s readable and engaging volume sets out in 140 pages what the 5G myth is and why we’d be far better off putting our energies into extending 4G coverage instead of deploying yet another mobile standard, with all the extra costs and faff factor that brings.

“If previous trends were followed, 5G would become widely deployed in 2022 [and] deliver realistic end-user data rates of 200Mbits/s and an increase in capacity of around 2x compared to current networks,” writes Prof Webb, who points out that current trends show data rate requirements flattening out by the year 2027.

“Hence ... the advances in speed and capacity that 5G might bring are not needed.”

Taking the reader through a lucid and jargon-free overview of mobile technology and standards development – complete with a quick look at each of 2G, 3G and 4G – Prof Webb makes a very compelling argument for the case that the UK and the wider mobile industry simply don’t need the speed boosts that 5G advocates argue for.

Dipping into technical language only where absolutely necessary to make the point – and combining this with the solid insights that only a former head of the IET and a one-time director of Ofcom can bring – the visiting professor from the Universities of Surrey and Southampton puts his central point across in an engaging and concise manner. You don’t get bogged down in a literary rabbit warren of what-ifs and whataboutery, which tends to characterise similar tomes in other fields.

Provocatively, Prof Webb doesn’t pull his punches when answering the question “if it’s so unnecessary, why is everyone so hellbent in favour of it?” To quote him on why mobile networks are outwardly keen, but not too keen, on 5G:

If [mobile networks] were to all critique 5G, pointing out that the costs would lower their profitability and that the services offered were not appealing to subscribers, then this might steer the industry in a more appropriate direction (such as those discussed in Chapter 7). But if one of them were critical when their competitors were supportive it might be exploited by their competitors, who could show how they were more forward-looking.

Instead of 5G, Prof Webb says we ought to concentrate on consistency of our existing mobile infrastructure – that is, things like ensuring “satisfactory data rates [are] available everywhere” rather than “blinding fast rates in some places and a lack of any connectivity in others”, something which will instantly endear this book to anyone who lives outside of a major town or city.

The 5G Myth: And why consistent connectivity is a better future is priced at £20.71 in paperback or £7.88 in Kindle format from Amazon, at the time of writing. ®

Similar topics

Broader topics


Other stories you might like

  • 5G C-band rollout at US airports slowed over radio altimeter safety fears
    Well, they did say from July, now they really mean from July 2023

    America's aviation watchdog has said the rollout of 5G C-band coverage near US airports won't fully start until next year, delaying some travelers' access to better cellular broadband at crowded terminals.

    Acting FAA Administrator Billy Nolen said in a statement this month that its discussions with wireless carriers "have identified a path that will continue to enable aviation and 5G C-band wireless to safely co-exist."

    5G C-band operates between 3.7-3.98GHz, near the 4.2-4.4GHz band used by radio altimeters that are jolly useful for landing planes in limited visibility. There is or was a fear that these cellular signals, such as from cell towers close to airports, could bleed into the frequencies used by aircraft and cause radio altimeters to display an incorrect reading. C-band technology, which promises faster mobile broadband, was supposed to roll out nationwide on Verizon, AT&T and T-Mobile US's networks, but some deployments have been paused near airports due to these concerns. 

    Continue reading
  • SpaceX: 5G expansion could kill US Starlink broadband
    It would be easier to take this complaint seriously if Elon wasn't so Elon

    If the proposed addition of the 12GHz spectrum to 5G goes forward, Starlink broadband terminals across America could be crippled, or so SpaceX has complained. 

    The Elon Musk biz made the claim [PDF] this week in a filing to the FCC, which is considering allowing Dish to operate a 5G service in the 12GHz band (12.2-12.7GHz). This frequency range is also used by Starlink and others to provide over-the-air satellite internet connectivity.

    SpaceX said its own in-house study, conducted in Las Vegas, showed "harmful interference from terrestrial mobile service to SpaceX's Starlink terminals … more than 77 percent of the time, resulting in full outages 74 percent of the time." It also claimed the interference will extend to a minimum of 13 miles from base stations. In other words, if Dish gets to use these frequencies in the US, it'll render nearby Starlink terminals useless through wireless interference, it was claimed.

    Continue reading
  • FCC: Applications for funds to replace Chinese comms kit lack evidence
    Well you told us to rip and ... hang on, we're not getting any money?

    The saga of the US government's plan to rip and replace China-made communications kit from the country's networks has a new twist: following reports that applications for funding far outstripped the cash set aside, it appears two-thirds of such applications lack adequate cost estimates or sufficient supporting evidence.

    The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) informed Congress that it had found deficiencies in 122 of the 181 of the applications filed with it by US carriers for funding to reimburse them for replacing telecoms equipment sourced from Chinese companies.

    The FCC voted nearly a year ago to reimburse medium and small carriers in the US for removing and replacing all network equipment provided by companies such as Huawei and ZTE. The telecoms operators were required to do this in the interests of national security under the terms of the Secure and Trusted Communications Networks Act.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022