Lords slam 'untrammelled' data sharing powers in Digital Economy Bill

'Deeply concerned' about possibility of sharing citizen info with companies


A House of Lords committee has slammed the "inappropriate" and "untrammelled" powers laid out in the Digital Economy Bill to share citizen data across the public sector.

The Delegated Powers Committee report recommended that the government removes broad powers to share information with a range of "specified persons", which could include private sector bodies.

It noted that the powers "would very significantly broaden the scope for the sharing of information across government departments, local authorities and other public bodies".

Under the plans, the Department for Work and Pensions would have power to disclose social security information on a bulk basis to all local authorities, police and schools.

That is intended to allow recipients to match the data against that already held to identify individuals "facing multiple disadvantages".

It is also intended to help the public sector reduce debt. For example the sharing of bulk data, such as HMRC's income tax records, about people living in particular areas to help authorities identify debtors.

However, the lords criticised the broad definition of the list of bodies citizen data could be shared with under clause 30 of the bill.

The committee said it is "deeply concerned" about the power to prescribe as a "specified person" someone "providing services to a public authority". That would mean private sector contractors could be entitled to receive and disclose citizen information.

"We consider it inappropriate for Ministers to have the almost untrammeled powers given by clause 30," said the report.

The lords recommended that the authorities intended as "specified persons" should be listed on the face of the Bill, and ministers should not have power to add any public authority.

It also said that government should remove plans to share data with any person the authority chooses "unless the government can explain to the satisfaction of the House why it is needed and what safeguards are in place to prevent its misuse".

Earlier this week, a separate Lords committee called for greater detail on how the UK government intends to introduce online porn age verification plans in the Digital Economy Bill.

Concerns have been raised that the restrictions could require the collection and retention of documents such as a copy of passports, driving licences. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Bank for International Settlements calls for reform of data governance
    Wants Big Tech to butt out, and return control to individuals

    The Bank for International Settlements (BIS) – a meta bank for the world's central banks and facilitator of cross-border payments – has advocated new governance systems that promote owner control of data and transparency over its use.

    In a report released on Thursday, the BIS argued that market failures mean that restoring de facto control of data to those who generate it has become necessary – along with requiring permission before service providers collect, share, and process it.

    Those market failures stem from consumers and businesses not understanding the benefits and costs of the sudden deluge of data they generate, as well as finding it difficult to assert any rights over it even if they do.

    Continue reading
  • Ex-Google, Uber AI heads launch ML error-detection platform
    'Soul-sucking' data problems were impetus for the founding of Galileo

    Machine learning alumni from Google, Uber, and Apple have started a new company to address errors in unstructured data.

    CEO Vikram Chatterji was previously product management lead for Google Cloud AI. CTO Atindriyo Sanyal was engineering leader for Uber AI's Michelangelo platform and was a founding engineer for SiriKit at Apple. VP of Engineering Yash Sheth led Google's speech recognition team.

    Galileo, their new venture, was founded in November 2021, operating under stealth until today's announcement.

    Continue reading
  • Don’t expect to get your data back from the Onyx ransomware group
    The cybercriminals trash files larger than 2MB, forever losing them to the void

    Ransomware groups in recent years have ramped up the threats against victims to incentivize them to pay the ransom in return for their stolen and encrypted data. But a new crew is essentially destroying files larger than 2MB, so data in those files is lost even if the ransom is paid.

    The group behind the Onyx operation is overwriting the data in those files with trash data rather than encrypting it, so the data cannot be recovered via a decryption key. Given that, victims of Onyx ransomware attacks are being urged not to pay the ransom.

    "There's a big problem: as the ransomware they are using is a trash skidware, it's destroying a part of the victims' files," analysts at the Malware Hunter Team wrote in a tweet. "Would say, no company should pay to these idiots as smaller files decryptable, big they can't decrypt, but they are stealing files too."

    Continue reading
  • Fake it until you make it: Can synthetic data help train your AI model?
    Yes and no. It's complicated.

    The saying "data is the new oil," was reportedly coined by British mathematician and marketing whiz Clive Humby in 2006. Humby's remark rings true more now than ever with the rise of deep learning.

    Data is the fuel powering modern AI models; without enough of it the performance of these systems will sputter and fail. And like oil, the resource is scarce and controlled by big businesses. What do you do if you're a small computer vision company? You can turn to fake data to train your models, and if you're lucky it might just work.

    The market for synthetic data generation grew to over $110 million in 2021 and is expected to increase to $1.15 billion by the end of 2027, according to a report published by research firm Cognilytica.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022