Make America, wait, what again? US Army may need foreign weapons to keep up

Putting the US of A first could require arms from Europe

Making America great again may require foreign-made weapon systems, a possibility that would contravene the Trump administration's stated goal to "buy American and hire American."

A Congressional Research Service (CRS) report published last week, "Selected Foreign Counterparts of U.S. Army Ground Combat Systems and Implications for Combat Operations and Modernization," finds that the US Army has failed to modernize its ground combat systems and now faces the possibility of operating under the limitations of Cold War-era equipment for years to come.

The report cites Army leaders fretting that for the first time since World War I, the US does not have a new ground combat vehicle under development. And it highlights concerns voiced in defense-oriented publications [paywalled; free 30-day subscription] that our enemies and even allies have modernized to the extent that the they have "outpaced us in some areas."

The US military has in the past purchased foreign-made weapon systems, like German-made 60 Fuchs NBC reconnaissance vehicles, which it rebranded XM-93 Fox. The CRS report suggests policymakers may want to do so again.

"The rise of increasingly capable foreign ground combat systems, the length of time it takes to develop and field a major combat system under current DoD acquisition regulations, and ongoing and anticipated defense budgetary constraints might present policymakers with an opportunity to revisit the viability of acquiring existing state-of-the art foreign ground combat systems and modifying them to meet Army requirements, as has been done in the past," the report says.

The report also cites a senior Army official who contends that Russian rocket, missile, and cannon artillery systems have greater range and are more lethal than US Army artillery and munitions.

Playing down the possibility that the US might engage in direct conflict with Russia or China, the report says US defense officials believe "we will surely fight their systems."

Steven Aftergood, who heads the Federation of American Scientists' Project on Government Secrecy, noted in a blog post on Monday that the CRS report does not describe the military in the dire terms Trump used in his inauguration speech.

In an email to The Register, Aftergood said that while shopping for weapon systems abroad conflicts with the new administration's stated policies, it might still be worthwhile.

"The possible acquisition of foreign weapon systems would be at odds with several declared positions of the Trump Administration," said Aftergood. "First, it is contrary to the 'buy American' stance. And it would cede technological leadership in military systems to a foreign producer. Depending on circumstances, however, it might still be the right move." ®

Broader topics

Other stories you might like

  • UK government opens consultation on medic-style register for Brit infosec pros

    Are you competent? Ethical? Welcome to UKCSC's new list

    Frustrated at lack of activity from the "standard setting" UK Cyber Security Council, the government wants to pass new laws making it into the statutory regulator of the UK infosec trade.

    Government plans, quietly announced in a consultation document issued last week, include a formal register of infosec practitioners – meaning security specialists could be struck off or barred from working if they don't meet "competence and ethical requirements."

    The proposed setup sounds very similar to the General Medical Council and its register of doctors allowed to practice medicine in the UK.

    Continue reading
  • Microsoft's do-it-all IDE Visual Studio 2022 came out late last year. How good is it really?

    Top request from devs? A Linux version

    Review Visual Studio goes back a long way. Microsoft always had its own programming languages and tools, beginning with Microsoft Basic in 1975 and Microsoft C 1.0 in 1983.

    The Visual Studio idea came from two main sources. In the early days, Windows applications were coded and compiled using MS-DOS, and there was a MS-DOS IDE called Programmer's Workbench (PWB, first released 1989). The company also came up Visual Basic (VB, first released 1991), which unlike Microsoft C++ had a Windows IDE. Perhaps inspired by VB, Microsoft delivered Visual C++ 1.0 in 1993, replacing the little-used PWB. Visual Studio itself was introduced in 1997, though it was more of a bundle of different Windows development tools initially. The first Visual Studio to integrate C++ and Visual Basic (in .NET guise) development into the same IDE was Visual Studio .NET in 2002, 20 years ago, and this perhaps is the true ancestor of today's IDE.

    A big change in VS 2022, released November, is that it is the first version where the IDE itself runs as a 64-bit process. The advantage is that it has access to more than 4GB memory in the devenv process, this being the shell of the IDE, though of course it is still possible to compile 32-bit applications. The main benefit is for large solutions comprising hundreds of projects. Although a substantial change, it is transparent to developers and from what we can tell, has been a beneficial change.

    Continue reading
  • James Webb Space Telescope has arrived at its new home – an orbit almost a million miles from Earth

    Funnily enough, that's where we want to be right now, too

    The James Webb Space Telescope, the largest and most complex space observatory built by NASA, has reached its final destination: L2, the second Sun-Earth Lagrange point, an orbit located about a million miles away.

    Mission control sent instructions to fire the telescope's thrusters at 1400 EST (1900 UTC) on Monday. The small boost increased its speed by about 3.6 miles per hour to send it to L2, where it will orbit the Sun in line with Earth for the foreseeable future. It takes about 180 days to complete an L2 orbit, Amber Straughn, deputy project scientist for Webb Science Communications at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center, said during a live briefing.

    "Webb, welcome home!" blurted NASA's Administrator Bill Nelson. "Congratulations to the team for all of their hard work ensuring Webb's safe arrival at L2 today. We're one step closer to uncovering the mysteries of the universe. And I can't wait to see Webb's first new views of the universe this summer."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022