VPN on Android means 'Voyeuristic Peeper Network' in many cases

Researchers spot bad behavior abounding in mobe apps


A worrying number of VPN apps for Android mobile devices are rife with malware, spying, and code injection, say researchers.

A study [PDF] from CSIRO Data61 in Australia, the University of New South Wales in Australia and the University of California at Berkeley found that Android apps advertising themselves as VPN clients often contain poor security protections, and in some cases engage in outright malicious activities.

"Many apps may legitimately use the VPN permission to offer (some form of) online anonymity or to enable access to censored content," the researchers write. "However, malicious app developers may abuse it to harvest users' personal information."

That sort of malicious activity is shockingly common, the researchers found. They studied the activity of 283 VPN apps on the Google Play store and catalogued the various risky and malicious activities they found:

  • 82 per cent of the VPN apps requested permission to access sensitive data on the device, such as SMS history.
  • 38 per cent of the apps contained some form of malware.
  • 16 per cent routed traffic through other devices, rather than a host server.
  • 16 per cent use in-path proxies to modify HTML traffic in transit.
  • Three of the 283 analysed apps specifically intercept bank, messaging, and social network traffic.

"Our results show that – in spite of the promises for privacy, security and anonymity given by the majority of VPN apps – millions of users may be unawarely subject to poor security guarantees and abusive practices inflicted by VPN apps," the researchers noted.

The study concluded that, in addition to users being wary in their choice of VPN apps and keeping a close eye on permissions, Google should look to help remedy the situation by setting stricter limits on what VPN apps are able to do in Android.

"The ability of the BIND_VPN_SERVICE permission to break Android's sandboxing and the naive perception that most users have about third-party VPN apps suggest that it is urging [sic] to re-consider Android's VPN permission model to increase the control over VPN clients," they said.

"Our analysis of the user reviews and the ratings for VPN apps suggested that the vast majority of users remain unaware of such practices even when considering relatively popular apps."

So, if you're shopping for a VPN client, what should you do? Well, a little research goes a long way: check reviews and recommendations, and steer clear of overreaching applications.

"Always pay attention to the permissions requested by apps that you download," said Professor Dali Kaafar, a senior researcher at CSIRO, the Australian government's boffinry nerve center. "This study shows that VPN app users, in particular, should take the time to learn about how serious the issues with these apps are and the significant risks they are taking using these services.”

The researchers' paper doesn't list all the apps it tried, which is a little frustrating. However, it does call out EasyOvpn, VPN Free, Tigervpns, DNSet, CM Data Manager, Rocket VPN, Globus VPN, Spotflux VPN and CyberGhost, as "malicious or intrusive." OkVpn, EasyVpn, SuperVPN, Betternet, CrossVpn, Archie VPN, HatVPN, sFly Network Booster, One Click VPN, and Fast Secure Payment, are also flagged up as containing malware in the VirusTotal database.

Open Gate, VPN Gate, and VyprVPN get a slap for using home broadband connections as egress points, and Tigervpns, StrongVPN, and HideMyAss raised suspicions after exogenous traffic was spotted from them.

Finally, we've heard nice things about Algo, if you're looking to set up your own VPN. ®


Other stories you might like

  • FTC signals crackdown on ed-tech harvesting kid's data
    Trade watchdog, and President, reminds that COPPA can ban ya

    The US Federal Trade Commission on Thursday said it intends to take action against educational technology companies that unlawfully collect data from children using online educational services.

    In a policy statement, the agency said, "Children should not have to needlessly hand over their data and forfeit their privacy in order to do their schoolwork or participate in remote learning, especially given the wide and increasing adoption of ed tech tools."

    The agency says it will scrutinize educational service providers to ensure that they are meeting their legal obligations under COPPA, the Children's Online Privacy Protection Act.

    Continue reading
  • Mysterious firm seeks to buy majority stake in Arm China
    Chinese joint venture's ousted CEO tries to hang on - who will get control?

    The saga surrounding Arm's joint venture in China just took another intriguing turn: a mysterious firm named Lotcap Group claims it has signed a letter of intent to buy a 51 percent stake in Arm China from existing investors in the country.

    In a Chinese-language press release posted Wednesday, Lotcap said it has formed a subsidiary, Lotcap Fund, to buy a majority stake in the joint venture. However, reporting by one newspaper suggested that the investment firm still needs the approval of one significant investor to gain 51 percent control of Arm China.

    The development comes a couple of weeks after Arm China said that its former CEO, Allen Wu, was refusing once again to step down from his position, despite the company's board voting in late April to replace Wu with two co-chief executives. SoftBank Group, which owns 49 percent of the Chinese venture, has been trying to unentangle Arm China from Wu as the Japanese tech investment giant plans for an initial public offering of the British parent company.

    Continue reading
  • SmartNICs power the cloud, are enterprise datacenters next?
    High pricing, lack of software make smartNICs a tough sell, despite offload potential

    SmartNICs have the potential to accelerate enterprise workloads, but don't expect to see them bring hyperscale-class efficiency to most datacenters anytime soon, ZK Research's Zeus Kerravala told The Register.

    SmartNICs are widely deployed in cloud and hyperscale datacenters as a means to offload input/output (I/O) intensive network, security, and storage operations from the CPU, freeing it up to run revenue generating tenant workloads. Some more advanced chips even offload the hypervisor to further separate the infrastructure management layer from the rest of the server.

    Despite relative success in the cloud and a flurry of innovation from the still-limited vendor SmartNIC ecosystem, including Mellanox (Nvidia), Intel, Marvell, and Xilinx (AMD), Kerravala argues that the use cases for enterprise datacenters are unlikely to resemble those of the major hyperscalers, at least in the near term.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022