These snapshots are Purely Cohesity

Backup data streams and now snapshots flash between firms

After announcing an initial backup integration between Pure's all-flash array and Cohesity's converged secondary storage a year ago, the two have now gone further with snapshot-level integration.

Cohesity converges secondary data storage storage silos with its SW which runs on its own hardware or as a SW-only Virtual Edition on third-party HW. It will also run in the public cloud.

The companies say there is full end-to-end integration, with efficient tiering on Cohesity's arrays of Pure FlashArray snapshots, and pre and postscripts for app consistency. The March 2016 announcement talks of policy-based backup and replication from Pure's FlashArray to Cohesity storage. The February announcement talks of how Cohesity integrates natively with Pure Storage FlashArray//m to improve snapshot-based data protection.

Customers are better off if data protection copies are not stored on the primary array. The gen 1 Pure-Cohesity integration worked with backup software transferring data from the Pure array to a Cohesity one. Now the integration has been extended with Cohesity natively supporting the Pure array's snapshot facilities.

They say: "By using Pure Storage snapshots instead of traditional backup software, customers can provide much more frequent backups (faster RPOs) and faster recovery times (faster RTOs). [Snapshots] can be taken as frequently as every few minutes without impacting production apps."

Snapshots on the primary array don't protect against that array failing. "By tiering snapshots to Cohesity, customers benefit from a second level of protection. Even if the Pure array becomes unavailable, data can still be recovered from Cohesity secondary storage."

Their joint offering provides:

  • Tiering of snapshots between Pure Storage and Cohesity using array snapshot APIs
  • Automation across both Pure Storage and Cohesity using common policies created in Cohesity
  • Pre and postscripts to provide application-consistent data protection
  • Ability to restore snapshots from Cohesity to any Pure Storage array (primary storage or alternate Pure Storage array)

Pure's channel salespeople can say this helps Pure Storage have a stronger product offer relative to Dell, HPE and IBM by enabling it to sell its array with integrated secondary storage for data protection, test+dev, analytics and compliance. They can say the Pure-Cohesity combo gives you faster apps (Pure) and saves mucho secondary storage cost (Cohesity). On the other side of the partnership Cohesity's channel get to sell into Pure's customer base.

The Pure-Cohesity deal applies to Pure's FlashArray and not to its FlashBlade product, which stores particular kinds of secondary data for fast-access analytics.

We might envisage Cohesity talking to Kaminario about the same kind of arrangement, with K2 arrays squirting out backups and snapshots to a Cohesity array.

You can check out a solution brief PDF here. ®

Other stories you might like

  • DigitalOcean tries to take sting out of price hike with $4 VM
    Cloud biz says it is reacting to customer mix largely shifting from lone devs to SMEs

    DigitalOcean attempted to lessen the sting of higher prices this week by announcing a cut-rate instance aimed at developers and hobbyists.

    The $4-a-month droplet — what the infrastructure-as-a-service outfit calls its virtual machines — pairs a single virtual CPU with 512 MB of memory, 10 GB of SSD storage, and 500 GB a month in network bandwidth.

    The launch comes as DigitalOcean plans a sweeping price hike across much of its product portfolio, effective July 1. On the low-end, most instances will see pricing increase between $1 and $16 a month, but on the high-end, some products will see increases of as much as $120 in the case of DigitalOceans’ top-tier storage-optimized virtual machines.

    Continue reading
  • GPL legal battle: Vizio told by judge it will have to answer breach-of-contract claims
    Fine-print crucially deemed contractual agreement as well as copyright license in smartTV source-code case

    The Software Freedom Conservancy (SFC) has won a significant legal victory in its ongoing effort to force Vizio to publish the source code of its SmartCast TV software, which is said to contain GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 copyleft-licensed components.

    SFC sued Vizio, claiming it was in breach of contract by failing to obey the terms of the GPLv2 and LGPLv2.1 licenses that require source code to be made public when certain conditions are met, and sought declaratory relief on behalf of Vizio TV owners. SFC wanted its breach-of-contract arguments to be heard by the Orange County Superior Court in California, though Vizio kicked the matter up to the district court level in central California where it hoped to avoid the contract issue and defend its corner using just federal copyright law.

    On Friday, Federal District Judge Josephine Staton sided with SFC and granted its motion to send its lawsuit back to superior court. To do so, Judge Staton had to decide whether or not the federal Copyright Act preempted the SFC's breach-of-contract allegations; in the end, she decided it didn't.

    Continue reading
  • US brings first-of-its-kind criminal charges of Bitcoin-based sanctions-busting
    Citizen allegedly moved $10m-plus in BTC into banned nation

    US prosecutors have accused an American citizen of illegally funneling more than $10 million in Bitcoin into an economically sanctioned country.

    It's said the resulting criminal charges of sanctions busting through the use of cryptocurrency are the first of their kind to be brought in the US.

    Under the United States' International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEA), it is illegal for a citizen or institution within the US to transfer funds, directly or indirectly, to a sanctioned country, such as Iran, Cuba, North Korea, or Russia. If there is evidence the IEEA was willfully violated, a criminal case should follow. If an individual or financial exchange was unwittingly involved in evading sanctions, they may be subject to civil action. 

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022