London Internet Exchange members vote no to constitution tweak

Peering peers reject proposed rules on keeping quiet about secret govt gagging orders


Members of LINX, the London Internet Exchange – the UK's largest net peering point – have rejected proposals that would reshape the company’s constitution and could block members from being consulted about government tapping instructions.

The vote, on Tuesday, followed a Reg report revealing that members had been given less than two weeks notice of a proposed change which would allow LINX’s chairman to “override” directors’ wishes and prevent members learning about controversial actions, including, according to LINX, “secret orders from the government”

Directors of the company had urged the 740 members of LINX, mostly Internet providers from overseas, to vote for the plans without any debate or considering alternatives, during a 10-minute “Extraordinary General Meeting” (EGM) held on Tuesday.

The majority of LINX members did not cast votes, The Reg has learned. Of those that did vote, 37 per cent rejected the plan and 63 per cent supported it. To comply with British Companies Acts law, 75 per cent of voting members must agree with any “special resolution” making major changes. The votes in favour therefore fell significantly short of the level legally required.

In comments on our original report, published at the weekend, LINX public affair director Malcolm Hutty said, “LINX is a committed membership organisation, and our members will be the ones that decide whether to change our Articles."

At the time of publication, LINX’s PR team had not responded to further questions from us about their future plans, or whether they would commit to consulting members about secrecy orders.

Adrian Kennard, who runs the small ISP Andrews & Arnold, said in a blog post our initial report “highlighted …that we need some frank and open debate within LINX on the whole issue of the IP [Investigatory Powers] Act and the possibility of secret orders to snoop on LINX traffic.”

“I am concerned that the changes [which had been proposed] could inadvertently allow such orders”, he added. “We need to be sure of some transparency, at least, before approving them … We need to debate and agree in advance the way this needs to be handled with members.”

“Do any of us (LINX members) want to be part of an organisation that would secretly snoop on its members? I would not,” Kennard added.

Asked if any secret tapping notices had been served on LINX, the Home Office told us that: “The provisions of the Investigatory Powers Act are yet to come into force, but for security reasons we would not be commenting on the issuing of any future notices.”

“There are regular discussions between government and telecommunications operators regarding their obligations and we will continue to work with them on these notices as we go forward”.

In fact, the existing relations between the GCHQ spy agency and British communications companies such as British Telecom and Vodafone are highly integrated, extremely secret and decades old. Parts of these companies were originally owned by the government, and were directly employed to maintain and run GCHQ surveillance centres.

According to documents released by former United States NSA official Edward Snowden, staff are even cross deployed between the companies and the spy agency, and are “embedded” so as to increase and improve bulk surveillance methods.

Existing, typical relationships to carry out bulk surveillance and tapping arrangements inside British companies have been revealed to involve creating security cleared and vetted “sensitive relationship teams” (SRTs) both inside GCHQ and the companies concerned.

Top British telecommunications companies already joined to GCHQ at the hip, according to Snowden documents include BT (covername "REMEDY"), Vodafone (covername "GERONTIC") and O2 (covername "ZAMENSIS"). All three companies, as well as other smaller players, have been required under previous laws to feed interception links directly to the national phone and internet tapping system, PRESTON, The Reg has revealed previously.

The Snowden documents do not suggest that LINX – unlike a dozen similar Internet Exchanges in the US – had been recruited to join this network by 2013.

One LINX member told us: “The good news is LINX have been taking legal advice to understand how they would handle such orders, and if they can provide warrant canaries [warning methods].”

William Waites of the Edinburgh-based HUBS Internet Exchange and a LINX member, published guidance last week asking other members to pause and think before nodding through the “gag order” plan. The vote this week, he told The Reg, would help give LINX’s wide membership “time to think.” ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Prisons transcribe private phone calls with inmates using speech-to-text AI

    Plus: A drug designed by machine learning algorithms to treat liver disease reaches human clinical trials and more

    In brief Prisons around the US are installing AI speech-to-text models to automatically transcribe conversations with inmates during their phone calls.

    A series of contracts and emails from eight different states revealed how Verus, an AI application developed by LEO Technologies and based on a speech-to-text system offered by Amazon, was used to eavesdrop on prisoners’ phone calls.

    In a sales pitch, LEO’s CEO James Sexton told officials working for a jail in Cook County, Illinois, that one of its customers in Calhoun County, Alabama, uses the software to protect prisons from getting sued, according to an investigation by the Thomson Reuters Foundation.

    Continue reading
  • Battlefield 2042: Please don't be the death knell of the franchise, please don't be the death knell of the franchise

    Another terrible launch, but DICE is already working on improvements

    The RPG Greetings, traveller, and welcome back to The Register Plays Games, our monthly gaming column. Since the last edition on New World, we hit level cap and the "endgame". Around this time, item duping exploits became rife and every attempt Amazon Games made to fix it just broke something else. The post-level 60 "watermark" system for gear drops is also infuriating and tedious, but not something we were able to address in the column. So bear these things in mind if you were ever tempted. On that note, it's time to look at another newly released shit show – Battlefield 2042.

    I wanted to love Battlefield 2042, I really did. After the bum note of the first-person shooter (FPS) franchise's return to Second World War theatres with Battlefield V (2018), I stupidly assumed the next entry from EA-owned Swedish developer DICE would be a return to form. I was wrong.

    The multiplayer military FPS market is dominated by two forces: Activision's Call of Duty (COD) series and EA's Battlefield. Fans of each franchise are loyal to the point of zealotry with little crossover between player bases. Here's where I stand: COD jumped the shark with Modern Warfare 2 in 2009. It's flip-flopped from WW2 to present-day combat and back again, tried sci-fi, and even the Battle Royale trend with the free-to-play Call of Duty: Warzone (2020), which has been thoroughly ruined by hackers and developer inaction.

    Continue reading
  • American diplomats' iPhones reportedly compromised by NSO Group intrusion software

    Reuters claims nine State Department employees outside the US had their devices hacked

    The Apple iPhones of at least nine US State Department officials were compromised by an unidentified entity using NSO Group's Pegasus spyware, according to a report published Friday by Reuters.

    NSO Group in an email to The Register said it has blocked an unnamed customers' access to its system upon receiving an inquiry about the incident but has yet to confirm whether its software was involved.

    "Once the inquiry was received, and before any investigation under our compliance policy, we have decided to immediately terminate relevant customers’ access to the system, due to the severity of the allegations," an NSO spokesperson told The Register in an email. "To this point, we haven’t received any information nor the phone numbers, nor any indication that NSO’s tools were used in this case."

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2021