Neuromorphic progress: And we for one welcome our new single artificial synapse overlords

August 4th, er, February 20th, 2017: Simple cyber-brain goes online

A team of engineers has built an artificial synapse with the hopes of creating a neural network system with similar processing powers as the human brain.

"The brain is capable of massively parallel information processing while consuming only 1‑100 fJ per synaptic event. Inspired by the efficiency of the brain, CMOS-based neural architectures and memristors are being developed for pattern recognition and machine learning," the researchers wrote in a paper published in Nature Materials this week.

The artificial synapse functions kinda like a capacitor combined with a MOSFET. It's made out of two thin organic films with three terminals connected by a solution of briny water. The liquid acts as an electrolyte between the two layers of film. The top film has a gate terminal, and the bottom film has source and drain terminals.

The artificial synapse ... Illustration credit: Yoeri van de Burgt et al

"It works like a real synapse but it's an organic electronic device that can be engineered," said Alberto Salleo, senior author of the paper in Nature Materials and associate professor of materials science and engineering at Stanford University.

"It's an entirely new family of devices because this type of architecture has not been shown before. For many key metrics, it also performs better than anything that's been done before with inorganics," he added.

Here's a summary of how it works: the top film layer controls the conductivity of the bottom layer. When you apply a voltage across the gate and ground, you increase or decrease the conductivity of the bottom film, depending on the gate voltage polarity. This is the synapse in write mode. You're storing information based on the electric state of the lower film: high conductivity could represent state 1 and low conductivity could be state zero.

When you remove the gate voltage, the state of the synapse is frozen in place. To put the device in read mode, you put a voltage across the source and drain terminals and measure the current flow. If the synapse has a high conductivity, a lot of current will flow because there's low electrical resistance. If the synapse has a low conductivity, not a lot of current will flow because there's high electrical resistance.

Thus, you write the synapse's memory contents using the gate voltage, and then read the memory back by measuring the resistance, or current flow, between the source and drain. The liquid electrolyte is key to altering the lower layer's conductivity. Positive ions move between the top and bottom film layers, via the fluid, depending on the polarity of the gate voltage, and the ion concentration improves or diminishes the lower layer's conductivity.

This design combines both storage and a transistor gate in one, meaning decisions can be made immediately on the memory contents, and the information can be held in place without requiring constant recharging. And rather than store a binary value, the artificial synapse can actually store 500 states, we're told. Overall, this is much more power efficient than today's computer processor cores that have to move data to and from decision-making circuits and caches and memories, it is claimed.


The way in which the synapse cell stores information by subtly changing the write-mode voltage is similar to how real neural pathways are strengthened and weakened during the learning process in the brain. Researchers have pretty much worked out the voltages needed to tune the synapse to a specific electrical state.

Neuromorphic computing – creating a system of electronic circuits that mimics neurobiological architectures in the nervous system – could enhance AI.

"Deep learning algorithms are very powerful, but they rely on processors to calculate and simulate the electrical states and store them somewhere else, which is inefficient in terms of energy and time," said Yoeri van de Burgt, lead author of the paper and assistant professor at Eindhoven University of Technology.

"Instead of simulating a neural network, our work is trying to make a neural network."

Only one artificial synapse has been built, and it's not enough to do anything particularly useful. But simulations show that the computational power from an array of synapses can recognize handwritten digits from zero to nine. Testing on three datasets shows that the simulated group of synapses could identify the numbers with an accuracy of 93 to 97 per cent.

It's a difficult task that requires pattern recognition and a lot of computational power. It's a common test for computer vision systems, using the MNIST database to benchmark algorithms and models, and something traditional computers struggle with.

The flexible organic material of the synapse offers another "tantalizing opportunity," too, the paper said. It could be used for brain implants – magic kit to plug in and improve human minds.

That's purely science fiction. The power efficiency of fake synapses lags massively behind the real thing. The artificial switch right now uses about 10,000 times more energy than the minimum energy required for a biological synapse to fire and pass signals to neurons. Powering millions or billions of these man-made synapses attached to your head is impossible from your body, and impractical from external supplies.

The goal is to attain similar efficiency levels, hopefully by massively shrinking the design.

Interest in neuromorphic computing has grown. Last year, IBM also published a paper in Nature that showed how a phase-changing material could mimic an artificial spiking neuron. The tech giant is collaborating with UK universities to create a giant "electronic brain" as part of the European Union-funded Human Brain Project, estimated to cost over €1bn. ®

Similar topics

Other stories you might like

  • Did hoodwink Americans with IRS facial-recognition tech, senators ask
    Biz tells us: Won't someone please think of the ... fraud we've stopped

    Democrat senators want the FTC to investigate "evidence of deceptive statements" made by regarding the facial-recognition technology it controversially built for Uncle Sam. made headlines this year when the IRS said US taxpayers would have to enroll in the startup's facial-recognition system to access their tax records in the future. After a public backlash, the IRS reconsidered its plans, and said taxpayers could choose non-biometric methods to verify their identity with the agency online.

    Just before the IRS controversy, said it uses one-to-one face comparisons. "Our one-to-one face match is comparable to taking a selfie to unlock a smartphone. does not use one-to-many facial recognition, which is more complex and problematic. Further, privacy is core to our mission and we do not sell the personal information of our users," it said in January.

    Continue reading
  • Meet Wizard Spider, the multimillion-dollar gang behind Conti, Ryuk malware
    Russia-linked crime-as-a-service crew is rich, professional – and investing in R&D

    Analysis Wizard Spider, the Russia-linked crew behind high-profile malware Conti, Ryuk and Trickbot, has grown over the past five years into a multimillion-dollar organization that has built a corporate-like operating model, a year-long study has found.

    In a technical report this week, the folks at Prodaft, which has been tracking the cybercrime gang since 2021, outlined its own findings on Wizard Spider, supplemented by info that leaked about the Conti operation in February after the crooks publicly sided with Russia during the illegal invasion of Ukraine.

    What Prodaft found was a gang sitting on assets worth hundreds of millions of dollars funneled from multiple sophisticated malware variants. Wizard Spider, we're told, runs as a business with a complex network of subgroups and teams that target specific types of software, and has associations with other well-known miscreants, including those behind REvil and Qbot (also known as Qakbot or Pinkslipbot).

    Continue reading
  • Supreme Court urged to halt 'unconstitutional' Texas content-no-moderation law
    Everyone's entitled to a viewpoint but what's your viewpoint on what exactly is and isn't a viewpoint?

    A coalition of advocacy groups on Tuesday asked the US Supreme Court to block Texas' social media law HB 20 after the US Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals last week lifted a preliminary injunction that had kept it from taking effect.

    The Lone Star State law, which forbids large social media platforms from moderating content that's "lawful-but-awful," as advocacy group the Center for Democracy and Technology puts it, was approved last September by Governor Greg Abbott (R). It was immediately challenged in court and the judge hearing the case imposed a preliminary injunction, preventing the legislation from being enforced, on the basis that the trade groups opposing it – NetChoice and CCIA – were likely to prevail.

    But that injunction was lifted on appeal. That case continues to be litigated, but thanks to the Fifth Circuit, HB 20 can be enforced even as its constitutionality remains in dispute, hence the coalition's application [PDF] this month to the Supreme Court.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022