We want Waymo money from you! Uber sued for 'stealing self-driving car' blueprints from Alphabet

How could app maker's week get any worse? Glad you asked


Alphabet's self-driving car outfit and Google stablemate Waymo is suing Uber, alleging theft of trade secrets and patent infringement.

Waymo claims one of its former executives who now works at Uber stole more than 14,000 confidential documents related to LiDAR mapping and navigation systems for use in autonomous vehicles – like the ones Uber is trying to develop.

According to the complaint [PDF], filed Thursday in the US District Court for San Francisco, Anthony Levandowski, founder of Ottomotto, the self-driving truck startup Uber acquired for $680m last year, built his company on blueprints lifted in the final days of his job at Waymo.

"Fair competition spurs new technical innovation, but what has happened here is not fair competition. Instead, Otto and Uber have taken Waymo's intellectual property so that they could avoid incurring the risk, time, and expense of independently developing their own technology," the complaint reads.

"Ultimately, this calculated theft reportedly netted Otto employees over half a billion dollars and allowed Uber to revive a stalled program, all at Waymo's expense."

Interestingly, it's claimed Levandowski, while at Uber, raised suspicions at Waymo after emailing schematics to an electronics supplier and accidentally CC'ing Waymo staff. The attached designs for a LiDAR system resembled Waymo's blueprints, it is claimed. It's also alleged Levandowski, while at Waymo, used his Alphabet-issued laptop to exfiltrate highly confidential documents.

An Uber spokesperson told The Register that "we take the allegations made against Otto and Uber employees seriously and we will review this matter carefully."

The complaint alleges that after falling behind Google/Waymo in the self-driving car space, Uber conspired with Levandowski to steal the technology for its LiDAR navigation and then defect. Allegedly, Levandowski acted at the direction of Uber when, in late 2015, he accessed Waymo's design server and downloaded 9.7GB worth of documents and data related to the LiDAR system.

"After downloading all of this confidential information regarding Waymo's LiDAR systems and other technology and while still a Waymo employee, Waymo is informed and believes that Mr Levandowski attended meetings with high-level executives at Uber's headquarters in San Francisco on January 14, 2016," the complaint reads.

Less than two weeks later, Waymo claims, Levandowski resigned from his position and opened shop at Otto in stealth mode. He began working to lure away Waymo staff and vendors, along with lifting more internal documents. Otto announced itself to the public in May, and by August it had been snapped up by Uber for a reported $680m.

"Instead of developing their own technology in this new space, Defendants stole Waymo's long-term investments and property," the lawsuit alleges. "While Waymo developed its custom LiDAR systems with sustained effort over many years, Defendants leveraged stolen information to shortcut the process and purportedly build a comparable LiDAR system in only nine months."

Waymo claims Uber, with the allegedly stolen technology in its hands, is now infringing three Alphabet-owned US patents:

  • 8,836,922: Devices and methods for a rotating LIDAR platform with a shared transmit/receive path
  • 9,368,936: Laser diode firing system
  • 9,086,273: Microrod compression of laser beam in combination with transmit lens

In addition to those patent infringement claims, Waymo is seeking damages for violations of the US Defend Trade Secret Act, the California Uniform Trade Secret Act, and California Business and Professions Code. It wants a jury trial, and an injunction banning Uber from using the technology.

The allegations will be piled onto what has been a nightmare week for Uber. Already under fire for allegations of sexual harassment by former employees, the dial-a-ride software developer has taken heat for its perceived lack of ethics and toxic workplace culture – a perception that only stands to grow now that it has been accused of stealing a rival's technology to pass off as its own. ®

Similar topics


Other stories you might like

  • Tesla driver charged with vehicular manslaughter after deadly Autopilot crash

    Prosecution seems to be first of its kind in America

    A Tesla driver has seemingly become the first person in the US to be charged with vehicular manslaughter for a deadly crash in which the vehicle's Autopilot mode was engaged.

    According to the cops, the driver exited a highway in his Tesla Model S, ran a red light, and smashed into a Honda Civic at an intersection in Gardena, Los Angeles County, in late 2019. A man and woman in the second car were killed. The Tesla driver and a passenger survived and were taken to hospital.

    Prosecutors in California charged Kevin George Aziz Riad, 27, in October last year though details of the case are only just emerging, according to AP on Tuesday. Riad, a limousine service driver, is facing two counts of vehicular manslaughter, and is free on bail after pleading not guilty.

    Continue reading
  • AMD returns to smartphone graphics with new Samsung chip for your pocket computer

    We're back in black

    AMD's GPU technology is returning to mobile handsets with Samsung's Exynos 2200 system-on-chip, which was announced on Tuesday.

    The Exynos 2200 processor, fabricated using a 4nm process, has Armv9 CPU cores and the oddly named Xclipse GPU, which is an adaptation of AMD's RDNA 2 mainstream GPU architecture.

    AMD was in the handheld GPU market until 2009, when it sold the Imageon GPU and handheld business for $65m to Qualcomm, which turned the tech into the Adreno GPU for its Snapdragon family. AMD's Imageon processors were used in devices from Motorola, Panasonic, Palm and others making Windows Mobile handsets.

    Continue reading
  • Big shock: Guy who fled political violence and became rich in tech now struggles to care about political violence

    'I recognize that I come across as lacking empathy,' billionaire VC admits

    Billionaire tech investor and ex-Facebook senior executive Chamath Palihapitiya was publicly blasted after he said nobody really cares about the reported human rights abuse of Uyghur Muslims in China.

    The blunt comments were made during the latest episode of All-In, a podcast in which Palihapitiya chats to investors and entrepreneurs Jason Calacanis, David Sacks, and David Friedberg about technology.

    The group were debating the Biden administration’s response to what's said to be China's crackdown of Uyghur Muslims when Palihapitiya interrupted and said: “Nobody cares about what’s happening to the Uyghurs, okay? ... I’m telling you a very hard ugly truth, okay? Of all the things that I care about … yes, it is below my line.”

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022