Did you buy anything from Microsoft's glum Apple Store knockoff? You may be owed $100

Redmond tosses $1.2m to settle suit over leaky receipts


Microsoft will cough up $1.2m to settle a class-action lawsuit after its retail stores leaked a little too much information about shoppers' payment cards.

On Friday, the Redmond giant agreed to give up roughly seven minutes of its quarterly revenue to a gaggle of Microsoft Store customers who claimed that their receipts displayed more of their payment card numbers than legally allowed.

The lawsuit [PDF], filed in the Southern Florida US District Court in 2015, was headed up by Carlos Guarisma, who made a purchase that year at the Microsoft Store in Aventura, Florida.

The receipt had, among other details on it, Guarisma's name, the name of the salesperson – and most importantly, the first six and last four digits of his payment card number. That's more than half the number of card number digits.

According to the 2003 US Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act (FACTA), retailers may only print the last five numbers of a payment card on the receipt. The law, designed to curb identity theft and fraud, has required compliance since 2006.

The lawsuit claims that, despite have known of the regulations for years and having an extensive staff dedicated to privacy and compliance, Microsoft looked the other way as its POS (point of service) terminals violated the law.

"Despite the clear language of the statute, Defendant willfully or knowingly chose not to comply," the claim reads. Guarisma filed suit against Microsoft on behalf of everyone who used a card to make a purchase at the Microsoft store between November 2013 and February 24 of this year.

According to the proposed terms of the settlement [PDF], Microsoft will kick over $1,194,696 to pay out to the affected shoppers in the US, who will individually be able to claim up to $100 if they come forward to complain. The payout will also cover attorneys' fees not to exceed one-third of the total package (roughly $400,000). Guarisma, as lead complainant, stands to get roughly $10,000.

The settlement is now awaiting approval and certification by Judge Cecilia Altonaga. ®

A Microsoft spokesperson contacted The Register to say: "This was a technical bug that we fixed immediately when it was brought to our attention. We're pleased this matter is resolved and are committed to protecting our customers."


Other stories you might like

  • Brave roasts DuckDuckGo over Bing privacy exception
    Search biz hits back at 'misleading' claims, saga lifts lid on Microsoft's web tracking advice

    Brave CEO Brendan Eich took aim at rival DuckDuckGo on Wednesday by challenging the web search engine's efforts to brush off revelations that its Android, iOS, and macOS browsers gave, to a degree, Microsoft Bing and LinkedIn trackers a pass versus other trackers.

    Eich drew attention to one of DuckDuckGo's defenses for exempting Microsoft's Bing and LinkedIn domains, a condition of its search contract with Microsoft: that its browsers blocked third-party cookies anyway.

    "For non-search tracker blocking (e.g. in our browser), we block most third-party trackers," explained DuckDuckGo CEO Gabriel Weinberg last month. "Unfortunately our Microsoft search syndication agreement prevents us from doing more to Microsoft-owned properties. However, we have been continually pushing and expect to be doing more soon."

    Continue reading
  • Workers win vote to form first-ever US Apple Store union
    Results set to be ratified by labor board by end of the week

    Workers at an Apple Store in Towson, Maryland have voted to form a union, making them the first of the iGiant's retail staff to do so in the United States.

    Out of 110 eligible voters, 65 employees voted in support of unionization versus 33 who voted against it. The organizing committee, known as the Coalition of Organized Retail Employees (CORE), has now filed to certify the results with America's National Labor Relations Board. Members joining this first-ever US Apple Store union will be represented by the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM).

    "I applaud the courage displayed by CORE members at the Apple store in Towson for achieving this historic victory," IAM's international president Robert Martinez Jr said in a statement on Saturday. "They made a huge sacrifice for thousands of Apple employees across the nation who had all eyes on this election."

    Continue reading
  • Apple’s M2 chip isn’t a slam dunk, but it does point to the future
    The chip’s GPU and neural engine could overshadow Apple’s concession on CPU performance

    Analysis For all the pomp and circumstance surrounding Apple's move to homegrown silicon for Macs, the tech giant has admitted that the new M2 chip isn't quite the slam dunk that its predecessor was when compared to the latest from Apple's former CPU supplier, Intel.

    During its WWDC 2022 keynote Monday, Apple focused its high-level sales pitch for the M2 on claims that the chip is much more power efficient than Intel's latest laptop CPUs. But while doing so, the iPhone maker admitted that Intel has it beat, at least for now, when it comes to CPU performance.

    Apple laid this out clearly during the presentation when Johny Srouji, Apple's senior vice president of hardware technologies, said the M2's eight-core CPU will provide 87 percent of the peak performance of Intel's 12-core Core i7-1260P while using just a quarter of the rival chip's power.

    Continue reading
  • Apple may have to cough up $1bn to Brits in latest iPhone Batterygate claim
    Lawsuit took its time, just like your older iOS handset

    Another day, another legal claim against Apple for deliberately throttling the performance of its iPhones to save battery power.

    This latest case was brought by Justin Gutmann, who has asked the UK's Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) to approve a collective action that could allow as many as 25 million Brits to claim compensation from the American technology giant. He claims the iGiant secretly degraded their smartphones' performance to make the battery power last longer.

    Apple may therefore have to cough up an eye-popping £768 million ($927 million), Gutmann's lawyers estimated, Bloomberg first reported this week.

    Continue reading

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022