Oh no, you're thinking, yet another cookie pop-up. Well, sorry, it's the law. We measure how many people read us, and ensure you see relevant ads, by storing cookies on your device. If you're cool with that, hit “Accept all Cookies”. For more info and to customize your settings, hit “Customize Settings”.

Review and manage your consent

Here's an overview of our use of cookies, similar technologies and how to manage them. You can also change your choices at any time, by hitting the “Your Consent Options” link on the site's footer.

Manage Cookie Preferences
  • These cookies are strictly necessary so that you can navigate the site as normal and use all features. Without these cookies we cannot provide you with the service that you expect.

  • These cookies are used to make advertising messages more relevant to you. They perform functions like preventing the same ad from continuously reappearing, ensuring that ads are properly displayed for advertisers, and in some cases selecting advertisements that are based on your interests.

  • These cookies collect information in aggregate form to help us understand how our websites are being used. They allow us to count visits and traffic sources so that we can measure and improve the performance of our sites. If people say no to these cookies, we do not know how many people have visited and we cannot monitor performance.

See also our Cookie policy and Privacy policy.

This article is more than 1 year old

IBM wipes away tiers to join cloud storage price wars

Also ties up with NetApp, Veritas, Red Hat, gets hot about hybrid everything

IBM's decided to play the “our cloud storage is even cheaper than your cloud storage” game, but by a different set of rules.

Big Blue's decided that tiered cloud storage assumes users make decisions based on unusually-potent-and-accurate insights into their long-term data use patterns, and therefore commit themselves to a tier of storage in the hope it's the cheapest place to store that data. But IBM reckons modern analytics and cognitive tools mean you'll probably start to consider archival or near-archival data more often, which it thinks will make you look pretty foolish if you have to pay to haul a heap of it out of AWS Glacier or Google Nearline to do some work.

IBM's therefore cooked up what it calls “Flex” storage. As the draft pricing table below shows, the product offers a flat price for cloud storage regardless of how much you access it. Big Blue's betting that over time you'll end up ahead, even if the per-gigabyte-per-month price is higher than that offered by rivals. The company also thinks you'll appreciate just tossing data into the cloud, rather than having to ponder just what tier and just what region to choose.

IBM Flex Storage draft pricing

Draft pricing for IBM Flex cloud storage. Big Blue may change these numbers before launching in early Q2 2017

Big Blue's been busy on the storage front with two other deals. One will see NetApp's AltaVault product gain the ability to send backups to IBM Cloud Object Storage. That data could lodge in the new Cold Vault IBM's added to its cloudy Object Storage service. Cold Vault is akin to AWS Glacier.

IBM's third storage move is a deal with Veritas that will see NetBackup 8.0 join the Bluemix Catalog of cloudy software. Veritas' flagship will also be able to use IBM's cloudy object storage as a backup target, an addition touted as helping to migrate data from on-premises storage to the cloud.

Also announced at IBM's aptly named “InterConnect” conference is a new deal with Red Hat, which has signed up IBM as a Certified Cloud and Service Provider. The practical effect of that relationship is that you'll be able to run Red Hat's OpenStack Platform on IBM's forthcoming Private Cloud. Red Hat's cut of Ceph will also run just fine on Big Blue's boxen. The deal also means that Red Hat customers can use their licences in IBM's cloud to build hybrid clouds.

IBM's also decided that because many organisations are already using multiple cloud or SaaS services, it might as well try to pipe data out of them all and into the maw of its analytics services. The idea here is that individual clouds probably produce decent insights, but that combining data from multiple sources will probably do better. IBM's therefore offering both plumbing and automation to get this stuff happening, some of it helped along by Watson to make sure the right data flows to the right places and that infrastructure can understand when these flows might send some stress its way. ®

Similar topics

Similar topics

Similar topics

TIP US OFF

Send us news


Other stories you might like